World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
João Santos Pereira

João Santos Pereira

Award Badge
Plant Science and Agronomy
Portugal
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 82 383 1 249 31606

João Santos Pereira publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by João Santos Pereira between 1976 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. João Santos Pereira published across 50 years, from 1976 to 2025, averaging 7 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2010. 7 of the 348 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2010. 1976: 1 publication 1977: 3 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 1 publication 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 3 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 9 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 6 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 24 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 18 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 25 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 6 publications
1976 2025

348 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
João Santos Pereira: publications per year, 1976 to 2025
Year Publications
1976 1
1977 3
1978 1
1979 1
1980 1
1981 0
1982 1
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 1
1987 3
1988 0
1989 9
1990 6
1991 1
1992 6
1993 2
1994 5
1995 8
1996 5
1997 7
1998 3
1999 4
2000 5
2001 5
2002 10
2003 8
2004 8
2005 24
2006 11
2007 18
2008 14
2009 17
2010 25
2011 12
2012 20
2013 21
2014 21
2015 16
2016 13
2017 3
2018 7
2019 8
2020 2
2021 4
2022 1
2023 0
2024 1
2025 6
Total 348
Download as CSV

João Santos Pereira publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where João Santos Pereira sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 246–250 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 249 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46 249
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

João Santos Pereira D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where João Santos Pereira sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12 82
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Plant Science and Agronomy in Portugal Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Plant Science and Agronomy in Portugal Leader Award
  • 2004 - Member of Academia Europaea

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Ecology
  • Botany
  • Ecosystem

His primary scientific interests are in Ecology, Ecosystem, Soil water, Photosynthesis and Botany. His Ecosystem research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Carbon sequestration, Mediterranean climate and Biodiversity. In his research on the topic of Soil water, Cutting and Allometry is strongly related with Dry matter.

João Santos Pereira has researched Photosynthesis in several fields, including Carbon dioxide, Agronomy and Sucrose. His Botany study deals with Horticulture intersecting with Eucalyptus globulus, Acclimatization and Ecophysiology. His Species richness research integrates issues from Productivity, Dominance, Grassland and Ecosystem diversity.

His most cited work include:

  • Understanding plant responses to drought — from genes to the whole plant (2426 citations)
  • Plant diversity and productivity experiments in european grasslands (1572 citations)
  • How Plants Cope with Water Stress in the Field? Photosynthesis and Growth (1348 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Ecology, Botany, Agronomy, Ecosystem and Quercus suber are his primary areas of study. Mediterranean climate, Woodland, Biodiversity, Grassland and Species richness are the subjects of his Ecology studies. His research investigates the connection between Botany and topics such as Horticulture that intersect with problems in RuBisCO.

His work carried out in the field of Agronomy brings together such families of science as Soil water and Nutrient. His Ecosystem research incorporates elements of Carbon sequestration and Understory. His Stomatal conductance research includes themes of Ecophysiology, Xylem and Transpiration.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Ecology (24.34%)
  • Botany (23.60%)
  • Agronomy (16.85%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2012-2021)?

  • Ecology (24.34%)
  • Mediterranean climate (15.36%)
  • Quercus suber (16.85%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

João Santos Pereira mainly focuses on Ecology, Mediterranean climate, Quercus suber, Ecosystem and Agronomy. His Ecology study frequently draws connections between related disciplines such as Precipitation. His studies deal with areas such as Productivity, Climate change, Woodland and Tree canopy as well as Mediterranean climate.

The various areas that João Santos Pereira examines in his Quercus suber study include Biomass, Canopy and Transpiration. He has researched Ecosystem in several fields, including Agroforestry, Growing season, Soil organic matter, Carbon sequestration and Grassland. His work in Agronomy addresses issues such as Evergreen, which are connected to fields such as Carbon sink.

Between 2012 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Root functioning, tree water use and hydraulic redistribution in Quercus suber trees: A modeling approach based on root sap flow (89 citations)
  • Root functioning, tree water use and hydraulic redistribution in Quercus suber trees: A modeling approach based on root sap flow (89 citations)
  • Environmental Effects on Cephalopod Population Dynamics: Implications for Management of Fisheries (81 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Botany
  • Ecosystem

João Santos Pereira mostly deals with Ecology, Mediterranean climate, Quercus suber, Ecosystem and Transpiration. João Santos Pereira combines subjects such as Agronomy and Precipitation with his study of Ecology. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Evergreen and Water content.

Quercus suber is a subfield of Botany that he tackles. João Santos Pereira interconnects Carbon sequestration and Overexploitation in the investigation of issues within Ecosystem. His work deals with themes such as Water balance, Root system and Stomatal conductance, which intersect with Transpiration.

Best Publications

  • Understanding plant responses to drought — from genes to the whole plant

    Maria Manuela Chaves;João Maroco;João Santos Pereira

  • How Plants Cope with Water Stress in the Field? Photosynthesis and Growth

    Maria Manuela Chaves;J. S. Pereira;J. Maroco;Maria Luisa Rodrigues

  • Plant diversity and productivity experiments in european grasslands

    A. Hector;Bernhard Schmid;Carl Beierkuhnlein;M. C. Caldeira

  • Modeling temporal and large‐scale spatial variability of soil respiration from soil water availability, temperature and vegetation productivity indices

    Markus Reichstein;Ana Rey;Annette Freibauer;John Tenhunen

  • Deficit irrigation in grapevine improves water‐use efficiency while controlling vigour and production quality

    M.M. Chaves;T.P. Santos;C.R. Souza;M.F. Ortuño

  • Local adaptation enhances performance of common plant species

    J. Joshi;B. Schmid;M. C. Caldeira;P. G. Dimitrakopoulos

  • Drying and wetting of Mediterranean soils stimulates decomposition and carbon dioxide emission: the "Birch effect".

    Paul Jarvis;Ana Rey;Charalampos Petsikos;Lisa Wingate

  • General stabilizing effects of plant diversity on grassland productivity through population asynchrony and overyielding

    Andy Hector;Yann Hautier;Philippe Saner;Lukas Wacker

  • Mediterranean cork oak savannas require human use to sustain biodiversity and ecosystem services

    Miguel N. Bugalho;María C. Caldeira;João Santos Pereira;James Aronson

  • ECOSYSTEM EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY MANIPULATIONS IN EUROPEAN GRASSLANDS

    E. M. Spehn;A. Hector;J. Joshi;M. Scherer-Lorenzen

  • The effect of water stress on photosynthetic carbon metabolism in four species grown under field conditions

    W. P. Quick;M. M. Chaves;R. Wendler;M. David

  • The role of legumes as a component of biodiversity in a cross‐European study of grassland biomass nitrogen

    E. M. Spehn;M. Scherer-Lorenzen;B. Schmid;A. Hector

  • No Consistent Effect of Plant Diversity on Productivity

    M. A. Huston;L. W. Aarssen;M. P. Austin;B. S. Cade

  • Water-use strategies in two co-occurring Mediterranean evergreen oaks: surviving the summer drought.

    T. S. David;M. O. Henriques;C. Kurz-Besson;J. Nunes

  • Partial rootzone drying: effects on growth and fruit quality of field-grown grapevines (Vitis vinifera)

    Tiago P. Santos;Carlos Manuel Antunes Lopes;M. Lucília Rodrigues;Cláudia R. de Souza

  • The influence of precipitation pulses on soil respiration – Assessing the “Birch effect” by stable carbon isotopes

    Stephan Unger;Cristina Máguas;João Santos Pereira;Teresa Soares David

  • Net ecosystem carbon exchange in three contrasting Mediterranean ecosystems ? the effect of drought

    J. S. Pereira;J. A. Mateus;L. M. Aires;G. Pita

  • Estimation of tree canopy cover in evergreen oak woodlands using remote sensing

    João M.B. Carreiras;José M.C. Pereira;João S. Pereira

  • Photochemical efficiency of photosystem II, photon yield of O2 evolution, photosynthetic capacity, and carotenoid composition during the midday depression of net CO2 uptake in Arbutus unedo growing in Portugal

    Barbara Demmig-Adams;William W. Adams;Klaus Winter;Angelika Meyer

  • Quality control of CarboEurope flux data. Part 1: Coupling footprint analyses with flux data quality assessment to evaluate sites in forest ecosystems

    Mathias Göckede;Mathias Göckede;Thomas Foken;Marc Aubinet;Mika Aurela

  • Partial rootzone drying: regulation of stomatal aperture and carbon assimilation in field-grown grapevines (Vitis vinifera cv. Moscatel)

    Cláudia R. de Souza;João Maroco;Tiago P. Santos;M. Lucília Rodrigues

  • Effects of deficit irrigation strategies on cluster microclimate for improving fruit composition of Moscatel field-grown grapevines

    Tiago Pedreira dos Santos;Carlos M. Lopes;M. Lucília Rodrigues;Claudia R. de Souza

  • European atlas of forest tree species

    Jesús San-Miguel-Ayanz;Daniele de Rigo;Giovanni Caudullo;Tracy Houston Durrant

  • Control of stomatal aperture and carbon uptake by deficit irrigation in two grapevine cultivars

    Cláudia R. de Souza;João Maroco;Tiago P. Santos;M. Lucília Rodrigues

  • Water Stress, CO2 and Climate Change

    M. M. Chaves;J. S. Pereira

  • Differences in the response of carbon assimilation to summer stress (water deficits, high light and temperature) in four Mediterranean tree species

    T. Faria;D. Silvério;E. Breia;R. Cabral

  • ABA xylem concentrations determine maximum daily leaf conductance of field‐grown Vitis vinifera L. plants

    M. J. Correia;J. S. Pereira;M. M. Chaves;M. L. Rodrigues

Frequent Co-Authors

Maria Manuela Chaves
Maria Manuela Chaves University of Lisbon
Maria C. Caldeira
Maria C. Caldeira University of Lisbon
João Maroco
João Maroco ISPA - University Institute of Psychological, Social and Life Sciences
Christiane Werner
Christiane Werner University of Freiburg
John Tenhunen
John Tenhunen University of Bayreuth
Serge Rambal
Serge Rambal Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Dario Papale
Dario Papale Tuscia University
Dan Yakir
Dan Yakir Weizmann Institute of Science
Riccardo Valentini
Riccardo Valentini Tuscia University
Casimiro Pio
Casimiro Pio University of Aveiro

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing João Santos Pereira

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles