World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 47 3226 2967 1552 1405 129 38532

Jesse Graham publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jesse Graham between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jesse Graham published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 8 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2012. 11 of the 152 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2012. 2007: 2 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 6 publications
2007 2025

152 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jesse Graham: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 2
2008 3
2009 4
2010 9
2011 4
2012 15
2013 7
2014 12
2015 8
2016 14
2017 11
2018 15
2019 7
2020 6
2021 7
2022 7
2023 10
2024 5
2025 6
Total 152
Download as CSV

Jesse Graham publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jesse Graham sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 124–133 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 129 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453 129
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Jesse Graham D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jesse Graham sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251 47
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Jesse Graham is affiliated with the University of Utah in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Social Sciences and Psychology, with a specific focus on subfields such as Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Social Psychology.

Their work addresses several main topics, including:

  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Ethics in Business and Education
  • Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Workplace Violence and Bullying

Jesse Graham has contributed to numerous publications, frequently appearing in venues such as:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Evolution and Human Behavior
  • American Psychologist

Some recent papers include:

  • "Morality beyond the WEIRD: How the nomological network of morality varies across cultures." (2023), Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • "Foundations of morality in Iran" (2020), Evolution and Human Behavior
  • "Moral values predict county-level COVID-19 vaccination rates in the United States." (2022), American Psychologist
  • "Political differences in free will belief are associated with differences in moralization." (2020), Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • "Moral concerns are differentially observable in language" (2021), Cognition

Throughout their career, Jesse Graham has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, notably:

  • Mohammad Atari
  • Morteza Dehghani
  • Kristina A. Diekmann
  • Samantha Dodson
  • Rachael Goodwin

Best Publications

  • Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science

    Alexander A. Aarts;Joanna E. Anderson;Christopher J. Anderson;Peter R. Attridge;Peter R. Attridge

  • Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations

    Jesse Graham;Jonathan Haidt;Brian A. Nosek

  • Moral Foundations Theory: The Pragmatic Validity of Moral Pluralism

    Jesse Graham;Jonathan Haidt;Sena Koleva;Matt Motyl

  • Mapping the Moral Domain

    Jesse Graham;Brian A. Nosek;Jonathan Haidt;Ravi Iyer

  • When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions that Liberals may not Recognize

    Jonathan Haidt;Jesse Graham

  • Beyond Beliefs: Religions Bind Individuals Into Moral Communities

    Jesse Graham;Jonathan Haidt

  • Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings

    Richard A. Klein;Michelangelo Vianello;Fred Hasselman;Byron G. Adams

  • Tracing the threads: How five moral concerns (especially Purity) help explain culture war attitudes

    Spassena P. Koleva;Jesse Graham;Ravi Iyer;Peter H. Ditto

  • Understanding Libertarian Morality: The Psychological Dispositions of Self-Identified Libertarians

    Ravi Iyer;Spassena Koleva;Jesse Graham;Peter Ditto

  • Above and Below Left–Right: Ideological Narratives and Moral Foundations

    Jonathan Haidt;Jesse Graham;Craig Joseph

  • Concepts of Happiness Across Time and Cultures

    Shigehiro Oishi;Jesse Graham;Selin Kesebir;Iolanda Costa Galinha

  • Social Ecology: Lost and Found in Psychological Science.

    Shigehiro Oishi;Jesse Graham

  • Sacred values and evil adversaries: A moral foundations approach.

    Jesse Graham;Jonathan Haidt

  • The Moral Stereotypes of Liberals and Conservatives: Exaggeration of Differences across the Political Spectrum

    Jesse Graham;Brian A. Nosek;Jonathan Haidt

  • Association of moral values with vaccine hesitancy

    Avnika B. Amin;Robert A. Bednarczyk;Cara E. Ray;Kala J. Melchiori

  • Awe, Uncertainty, and Agency Detection

    Piercarlo Valdesolo;Jesse Graham

  • Dehumanization increases instrumental violence, but not moral violence.

    Tage S. Rai;Piercarlo Valdesolo;Jesse Graham

  • Planet of the Durkheimians: Where Community, Authority, and Sacredness Are Foundations of Morality

    Jonathan Haidt;Jesse Graham

  • Atlas of Moral Psychology

    Kurt Gray;Jesse Graham

  • Cultural differences in moral judgment and behavior, across and within societies

    Jesse Graham;Peter Meindl;Erica Beall;Kate M Johnson

  • Are all types of morality compromised in psychopathy

    Andrea L Glenn;Ravi Iyer;Jesse Graham;Spassena Koleva

  • The Moral Stereotypes of Liberals and Conservatives: Exaggeration of Differences Across the Political Divide

    Jesse Graham;Brian A. Nosek;Jonathan Haidt

Frequent Co-Authors

Jonathan Haidt
Jonathan Haidt New York University
Peter H. Ditto
Peter H. Ditto University of California, Irvine
Brian A. Nosek
Brian A. Nosek Center for Open Science
Jay J. Van Bavel
Jay J. Van Bavel New York University
Liane Young
Liane Young Boston College
Sapna Cheryan
Sapna Cheryan University of Washington
Andrei Cimpian
Andrei Cimpian New York University
Fiery Cushman
Fiery Cushman Harvard University
Daniel C. Molden
Daniel C. Molden Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The demand for professionals in social sciences and humanities is growing, especially in areas like mental health, counseling, and social work. Online learning has made pursuing these fields more accessible and flexible, allowing students to balance work and study while gaining essential skills.

For those looking to make a difference in communities, an accelerated msw online can fast-track your path to advanced social work roles. If you're interested in understanding human behavior, consider an accelerated psychology degree online, which opens doors to careers in counseling, human resources, and more.

Counseling is another rewarding option. Pursuing the cheapest online school counseling programs (cacrep-accredited) allows students to gain specialized credentials without taking on excessive debt. Similarly, those interested in family therapy can explore a marriage and family therapist degree online to prepare for licensure and clinical practice.

With so many online options, students have the flexibility to find a program that matches their goals, schedule, and budget—all while building a foundation for a meaningful, impactful career.

Best Scientists Citing Jesse Graham

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles