World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 39 6215 5758 445 425 233 5212

Grzegorz Kwiatek publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Grzegorz Kwiatek between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Grzegorz Kwiatek published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 10.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2020. 29 of the 245 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2020. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 25 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 12 publications
2003 2025

245 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Grzegorz Kwiatek: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 1
2005 1
2006 0
2007 0
2008 4
2009 9
2010 5
2011 7
2012 9
2013 13
2014 11
2015 9
2016 21
2017 20
2018 13
2019 18
2020 25
2021 14
2022 15
2023 20
2024 17
2025 12
Total 245
Download as CSV

Grzegorz Kwiatek publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Grzegorz Kwiatek sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 228–237 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 233 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262 233
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Grzegorz Kwiatek D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Grzegorz Kwiatek sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349 39
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Grzegorz Kwiatek is affiliated with Freie Universität Berlin in Germany and has contributed extensively to research in Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a particular focus on Geophysics. Their work spans several subfields including Artificial Intelligence applications, Mechanics of Materials, Ocean Engineering, and Environmental Engineering. The core of their research centers on earthquake and tectonic studies, as well as seismic phenomena.

They have published numerous papers, frequently collaborating with colleagues such as Georg Dresen, Marco Bohnhoff, Patricia Martínez-Garzón, Lei Wang, and Thomas Goebel. Their collaborative network highlights a strong engagement with researchers specializing in earthquake physics and related geophysical processes.

Kwiatek has published in various scientific journals, with multiple contributions in the following venues:

  • Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
  • Geophysical Journal International
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Earth and Planetary Science Letters
  • Seismological Research Letters

Their recent significant papers include:

  • Laboratory Study on Fluid-Induced Fault Slip Behavior: The Role of Fluid Pressurization Rate, 2020, Geophysical Research Letters
  • Seismic and Aseismic Preparatory Processes Before Large Stick-Slip Failure, 2020, Pure and Applied Geophysics
  • Seismic Moment Evolution During Hydraulic Stimulations, 2020, Geophysical Research Letters
  • Injection-Induced Seismic Moment Release and Laboratory Fault Slip: Implications for Fluid-Induced Seismicity, 2020, Geophysical Research Letters
  • An open data infrastructure for the study of anthropogenic hazards linked to georesource exploitation, 2020, Scientific Data

The topics covered by Kwiatek's work reflect a focus on seismic waves and analysis, seismic imaging and inversion techniques, and rock mechanics and modeling. Their research addresses practical and theoretical aspects of seismic activity, contributing to earthquake detection and analysis as well as understanding physical processes governing seismicity.

Main topics of their research include:

  • Earthquake and tectonic studies
  • Earthquake Detection and Analysis
  • Seismic Waves and Analysis
  • Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
  • Seismology and Earthquake Studies
  • High-pressure geophysics and materials
  • Rock Mechanics and Modeling

Best Publications

  • Slip tendency analysis, fault reactivation potential and induced seismicity in a deep geothermal reservoir

    Inga Moeck;Grzegorz Kwiatek;Günter Zimmermann

  • Source Parameters of Picoseismicity Recorded at Mponeng Deep Gold Mine, South Africa: Implications for Scaling Relations

    G. Kwiatek;K. Plenkers;G. Dresen

  • Controlling fluid-induced seismicity during a 6.1-km-deep geothermal stimulation in Finland

    Grzegorz Kwiatek;Tero Saarno;Thomas Ader;Felix Bluemle

  • MSATSI: A MATLAB Package for Stress Inversion Combining Solid Classic Methodology, a New Simplified User‐Handling, and a Visualization Tool

    Patricia Martínez‐Garzón;Grzegorz Kwiatek;Michèle Ickrath;Marco Bohnhoff

  • What allows seismic events to grow big?: Insights from b-value and fault roughness analysis in laboratory stick-slip experiments

    Thomas H.W. Goebel;Grzegorz Kwiatek;Thorsten W. Becker;Emily E. Brodsky

  • Hydraulic fracture monitoring in hard rock at 410 m depth with an advanced fluid-injection protocol and extensive sensor array

    Arno Zang;Ove Stephansson;Leif Stenberg;Katrin Plenkers

  • Spatiotemporal changes, faulting regimes, and source parameters of induced seismicity: A case study from The Geysers geothermal field

    Patricia Martínez-Garzón;Grzegorz Kwiatek;Hiroki Sone;Marco Bohnhoff;Marco Bohnhoff

  • First field application of cyclic soft stimulation at the Pohang Enhanced Geothermal System site in Korea

    Hannes Hofmann;Günter Zimmermann;Marton Farkas;Ernst Huenges

  • Stress tensor changes related to fluid injection at The Geysers geothermal field, California

    Patricia Martínez-Garzón;Marco Bohnhoff;Grzegorz Kwiatek;Georg Dresen

  • Seismic moment tensor and b value variations over successive seismic cycles in laboratory stick‐slip experiments

    Grzegorz Kwiatek;T. H. W. Goebel;Georg Dresen

  • Laboratory study on fluid‐induced fault slip behavior: The role of fluid pressurization rate

    Lei Wang;Lei Wang;Grzegorz Kwiatek;Grzegorz Kwiatek;Erik Rybacki;Audrey Bonnelye

  • HybridMT: A MATLAB/Shell Environment Package for Seismic Moment Tensor Inversion and Refinement

    Grzegorz Kwiatek;Patricia Martínez‐Garzón;Marco Bohnhoff

  • Effects of long‐term fluid injection on induced seismicity parameters and maximum magnitude in northwestern part of The Geysers geothermal field

    Grzegorz Kwiatek;Patricia Martínez-Garzón;Georg Dresen;Marco Bohnhoff

  • High-resolution analysis of seismicity induced at Berlín geothermal field, El Salvador

    G. Kwiatek;F. Bulut;M. Bohnhoff;G. Dresen

  • Frequency-Magnitude Characteristics Down to Magnitude -4.4 for Induced Seismicity Recorded at Mponeng Gold Mine, South Africa

    G. Kwiatek;K. Plenkers;M. Nakatani;Y. Yabe

  • Assessment of P and S wave energy radiated from very small shear-tensile seismic events in a deep South African mine

    Grzegorz Kwiatek;Yehuda Ben-Zion

  • Seismic and Aseismic Preparatory Processes Before Large Stick–Slip Failure

    Georg Dresen;Grzegorz Kwiatek;Grzegorz Kwiatek;Thomas Goebel;Yehuda Ben-Zion

  • A refined methodology for stress inversions of earthquake focal mechanisms

    Patricia Martínez-Garzón;Yehuda Ben-Zion;Niloufar Abolfathian;Grzegorz Kwiatek

  • Volumetric components in the earthquake source related to fluid injection and stress state

    Patricia Martínez-Garzón;Grzegorz Kwiatek;Marco Bohnhoff;Georg Dresen

  • An improved method for seismic moment tensor inversion of acoustic emissions through assessment of sensor coupling and sensitivity to incidence angle

    Grzegorz Kwiatek;Elli Maria Charalampidou;Georg Dresen;Sergei Stanchits

Frequent Co-Authors

Marco Bohnhoff
Marco Bohnhoff Freie Universität Berlin
Georg Dresen
Georg Dresen University of Potsdam
Yehuda Ben-Zion
Yehuda Ben-Zion University of Southern California
Peter Malin
Peter Malin University of Auckland
Arno Zang
Arno Zang University of Potsdam
Jean Schmittbuhl
Jean Schmittbuhl University of Strasbourg
Václav Vavryčuk
Václav Vavryčuk Czech Academy of Sciences
Günter Zimmermann
Günter Zimmermann Technical University of Berlin
Gilberto Saccorotti
Gilberto Saccorotti National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology
Oliver Heidbach
Oliver Heidbach University of Potsdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens doors to various complementary academic paths and careers. For students interested in information management and research, exploring ala mlis programs can lead to careers in library and information science, which often support scientific research institutions and environmental data management.

Additionally, pursuing a library science degree offers skills in organizing and curating specialized collections, useful for Earth Science professionals dealing with extensive archives of geological and environmental records.

For those looking to capture and communicate natural phenomena visually, an online photography degree online provides practical skills in digital media, useful for scientific documentation and public education.

Furthermore, veterans seeking to advance their education should consider programs tailored to their needs, such as an online photography degree for military veterans, which can facilitate a smooth transition into civilian careers connected with environmental and documentary photography.

Best Scientists Citing Grzegorz Kwiatek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles