2020 - Fellow of American Geophysical Union (AGU)
Rachel E. Abercrombie spends much of her time researching Seismology, Aftershock, Foreshock, Earthquake swarm and Interplate earthquake. Her Seismology study often links to related topics such as Scaling. The study incorporates disciplines such as Seismic moment, S-wave and Tectonics in addition to Scaling.
Her work carried out in the field of Aftershock brings together such families of science as Hypocenter and Fault. She has included themes like Quake, Earthquake magnitude and Depth of focus in her Foreshock study. Her Subduction research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Intraplate earthquake and Induced seismicity, Seismotectonics, Seismic gap.
Seismology, Aftershock, Stress drop, Induced seismicity and Borehole are her primary areas of study. Her work in Seismology addresses issues such as Magnitude, which are connected to fields such as Plate tectonics. Her biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Intraplate earthquake, Fault, Seismic gap and Scaling.
Her research investigates the connection with Stress drop and areas like Tectonophysics which intersect with concerns in Mathematical geophysics. Her research integrates issues of Seismometer and San andreas fault in her study of Borehole. Her studies examine the connections between Earthquake swarm and genetics, as well as such issues in Interplate earthquake, with regards to Episodic tremor and slip.
Rachel E. Abercrombie mostly deals with Seismology, Stress drop, Sequence, Induced seismicity and Transform fault. Rachel E. Abercrombie incorporates Seismology and Trench in her research. Her research investigates the connection between Stress drop and topics such as Tectonophysics that intersect with problems in Mechanics.
Her Induced seismicity research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Hikurangi Margin, Geodesy, Ocean bottom and Earthquake hazard. Her biological study deals with issues like Fracture zone, which deal with fields such as Ridge and Seismometer. Her research in Aftershock intersects with topics in Earthquake swarm and Borehole.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.
Earthquake source scaling relationships from −1 to 5 ML using seismograms recorded at 2.5-km depth
Rachel E. Abercrombie.
Journal of Geophysical Research (1995)
Can observations of earthquake scaling constrain slip weakening
Rachel E. Abercrombie;James R. Rice.
Geophysical Journal International (2005)
Depth dependence of earthquake frequency‐magnitude distributions in California: Implications for rupture initiation
Jim Mori;Rachel E. Abercrombie.
Journal of Geophysical Research (1997)
A Common Origin for Aftershocks, Foreshocks, and Multiplets
Karen R. Felzer;Rachel E. Abercrombie;Göran Ekström.
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2004)
Triggering of the 1999 MW 7.1 Hector Mine earthquake by aftershocks of the 1992 MW 7.3 Landers earthquake
Karen R. Felzer;Thorsten W. Becker;Rachel E. Abercrombie;Göran Ekström.
Journal of Geophysical Research (2002)
Source parameters of small earthquakes recorded at 2.5 km depth, Cajon Pass, southern California: Implications for earthquake scaling
Rachel Abercrombie;Peter Leary.
Geophysical Research Letters (1993)
Near-Surface Attenuation and Site Effects from Comparison of Surface and Deep Borehole Recordings
Rachel E. Abercrombie.
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (1997)
The 1994 Java tsunami earthquake: Slip over a subducting seamount
Rachel E. Abercrombie;Michael Antolik;Karen Felzer;Göran Ekström.
Journal of Geophysical Research (2001)
Earthquake slip on oceanic transform faults.
Rachel E. Abercrombie;Göran Ekström.
Nature (2001)
Occurrence patterns of foreshocks to large earthquakes in the western United States
Rachel E. Abercrombie;Rachel E. Abercrombie;Jim Mori.
Nature (1996)
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:
University of California, San Diego
Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Kyoto University
University of Oxford
GNS Science
University of British Columbia
Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Australian National University
University of Colorado Boulder
California Institute of Technology
Austrian Academy of Sciences
University of Granada
Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Leibniz Association
Universidade Nova de Lisboa
University of Tokyo
Peking University
University of Amsterdam
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Lund University
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
University of British Columbia
University of Kentucky
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Radboud University Nijmegen