World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
41
Citations
12167
World Ranking
2138
National Ranking
1233

Lawrence M. Ausubel publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence M. Ausubel sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 82 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

Lawrence M. Ausubel D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence M. Ausubel sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2007 - Fellows of the Econometric Society

Overview

Lawrence M. Ausubel is affiliated with the University of Maryland, College Park in the United States. Their research spans several fields including Decision Sciences, Economics, Econometrics and Finance, as well as Business, Management and Accounting.

Their work focuses on subfields such as Management Science and Operations Research, Economics and Econometrics, and Marketing. The main topics covered in their research include Auction Theory and Applications, Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems, and Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing.

Ausubel has published in the International Economic Review, contributing at least one paper to this venue. The notable recent paper includes:

  • REVEALED PREFERENCE AND ACTIVITY RULES IN DYNAMIC AUCTIONS, 2020, International Economic Review

Frequent collaboration has been recorded with the coauthor Oleg Baranov.

Lawrence M. Ausubel was recognized as a Fellow of the Econometric Society in 2007.

Best Publications

  • The Failure of Competition in the Credit Card Market

    Lawrence M Ausubel

  • Demand Reduction and Inefficiency in Multi-Unit Auctions

    Lawrence M. Ausubel;Peter Cramton

  • Computer implemented methods and apparatus for auctions

    Lawrence M. Ausubel

  • Ascending Auctions with Package Bidding

    Lawrence M. Ausubel;Paul R. Milgrom

  • The Lovely but Lonely Vickrey Auction

    Lawrence M. Ausubel;Paul Milgrom

  • Demand Reduction and Inefficiency in Multi-Unit Auctions

    Lawrence M. Ausubel;Peter Cramton;Marek Pycia;Marzena Rostek

  • An Efficient Ascending-Bid Auction for Multiple Objects

    Lawrence M. Ausubel

  • Insider Trading In A Rational Expectations Economy

    Lawrence M. Ausubel

  • REPUTATION IN BARGAINING AND DURABLE GOODS MONOPOLY

    Lawrence M. Ausubel;Raymond J. Deneckere

  • Ascending bid auction for multiple objects

    Lawrence M. Ausubel

  • Adverse Selection in the Credit Card Market

    Lawrence M. Ausubel

  • The Clock-Proxy Auction: A Practical Combinatorial Auction Design *

    Lawrence M. Ausubel;Peter Cramton;Paul R. Milgrom

  • Bargaining with Incomplete Information

    Lawrence M. Ausubel;Peter Cramton;Raymond J. Deneckere

  • An efficient dynamic auction for heterogeneous commodities

    Lawrence M. Ausubel

  • Synergies in Wireless Telephony: Evidence from the Broadband PCS Auctions

    Lawrence M. Ausubel;Peter Cramton;R. Preston McAfee;John McMillan

  • Time Inconsistency in the Credit Card Market

    Unknown

  • Auctioning Many Divisible Goods

    Lawrence M. Ausubel;Peter Cramton

  • One is almost enough for monopoly

    Lawrence M. Ausubel;Raymond J. Deneckere

  • Vickrey Auctions with Reserve Pricing

    Lawrence M. Ausubel;Peter Cramton

  • System and method for a dynamic auction with package bidding

    Lawrence M. Ausubel;Paul R. Milgrom

  • Synergies in Wireless Telephony: Evidence from the Broadband PCS Auctions

    Lawrence M. Ausubel;Peter Cramton;Randolph McAfee;John McMillan

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Cramton
Peter Cramton University of Maryland, College Park
Paul Milgrom
Paul Milgrom Stanford University
Mark Hansen
Mark Hansen University of California, Berkeley
Michael O. Ball
Michael O. Ball University of Maryland, College Park
R. Preston McAfee
R. Preston McAfee Google (United States)
John McMillan
John McMillan Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Economics and Finance studies in the USA can open doors to a variety of online degree programs tailored to complement your career ambitions. For those interested in the growing field of quantitative analysis, enrolling in a master of science in data analytics online program can provide essential skills to interpret complex data and inform business decisions.

If leadership and people management align with your goals, consider the best organizational leadership master's programs. These programs focus on organizational strategy, ethical decision-making, and effective team leadership.

Alternatively, you may want to explore the masters in business intelligence and analytics online. This degree equips graduates with expertise in leveraging business data for competitive advantage.

For broader business management skills without standardized test requirements, the best online mba no gmat programs are a practical option. These provide flexible learning pathways, ideal for working professionals seeking advancement in leadership or finance roles.

Best Scientists Citing Lawrence M. Ausubel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles