World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
58
Citations
12883
World Ranking
4154
National Ranking
1882

G. Rees Cosgrove publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where G. Rees Cosgrove sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 201 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

G. Rees Cosgrove D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where G. Rees Cosgrove sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

G. Rees Cosgrove is affiliated with Brigham and Women's Hospital in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in medicine and neuroscience. Their work spans key areas including neurology, cognitive neuroscience, cellular and molecular neuroscience, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, and biomedical engineering.

The main topics of Cosgrove's research encompass:

  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Epilepsy research and treatment

Cosgrove has published numerous papers in prominent academic journals. Some of their recent works include:

  • "Magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy for essential tremor: 5-year follow-up results" (2022) published in Journal of neurosurgery
  • "Allometric rules for mammalian cortical layer 5 neuron biophysics" (2021) published in Nature
  • "Closed-loop enhancement and neural decoding of cognitive control in humans" (2021) published in Nature Biomedical Engineering
  • "Single cell RNA sequencing of human microglia uncovers a subset associated with Alzheimer's disease" (2020) published in Nature Communications
  • "MR-guided focused ultrasound pallidotomy for Parkinson's disease: safety and feasibility" (2020) published in Journal of neurosurgery

The frequent publication venues where Cosgrove's research appears include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neurosurgery
  • Frontiers in Neurology
  • Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery
  • Journal of neurosurgery

Collaboration is a significant part of Cosgrove's scientific activity, with frequent co-authors comprising:

  • Sydney S. Cash
  • Nathan McDannold
  • Melissa Chua
  • Ziv M. Williams
  • Angelique C. Paulk

Cosgrove's research contributions intersect clinical neuroscience and advanced imaging technologies, particularly focusing on interventions such as focused ultrasound for movement disorders and brain function modulation. Their work also advances understanding of neuronal biophysics and cognitive control mechanisms.

Best Publications

  • Cerebral blood volume maps of gliomas : comparison with tumor grade and histologic findings

    H J Aronen;I E Gazit;D N Louis;B R Buchbinder

  • A randomized trial of focused ultrasound thalamotomy for essential tremor

    W. Jeffrey Elias;Nir Lipsman;William G. Ondo;Pejman Ghanouni

  • Human anterior cingulate neurons and the integration of monetary reward with motor responses.

    Ziv M Williams;George Bush;Scott L Rauch;G Rees Cosgrove

  • Language dominance determined by whole brain functional MRI in patients with brain lesions

    R.R. Benson;D.B. FitzGerald;L.L. LeSueur;D.N. Kennedy

  • Single cell RNA sequencing of human microglia uncovers a subset that is associated with Alzheimer’s disease: Molecular and cell biology: Inflammatory and microglia‐mediated mechanisms in AD

    Marta Olah;Vilas Menon;Naomi Habib;Mariko Taga

  • Prospective long-term follow-up of 44 patients who received cingulotomy for treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Darin D. Dougherty;Lee Baer;G. Rees Cosgrove;Edwin H. Cassem

  • MEG versus EEG localization test using implanted sources in the human brain

    D Cohen;B N Cuffin;K Yunokuchi;R Maniewski

  • White matter tractography for neurosurgical planning: A topography-based review of the current state of the art.

    Walid I. Essayed;Fan Zhang;Prashin Unadkat;G. Rees Cosgrove

  • Cerebral metabolic correlates as potential predictors of response to anterior cingulotomy for treatment of major depression.

    Darin D. Dougherty;Anthony P. Weiss;G. Rees Cosgrove;Nathaniel M. Alpert

  • Deep brain stimulation of the anterior internal capsule for the treatment of Tourette syndrome: technical case report.

    Alice W Flaherty;Ziv M Williams;Ramin Amirnovin;Ekkehard Kasper

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation: complementary approaches in the evaluation of cortical motor function.

    T. Krings;B. R. Buchbinder;W. E. Butler;K. H. Chiappa

  • Cerebral metabolic correlates as potential predictors of response to anterior cingulotomy for obsessive compulsive disorder.

    Scott L Rauch;Darin D Dougherty;G.Rees Cosgrove;Edwin H Cassem

  • Safety and efficacy of a novel polyethylene glycol hydrogel sealant for watertight dural repair.

    G. Rees Cosgrove;Johnny B. Delashaw;J. Andre Grotenhuis;John M. Tew

  • The value of multichannel MEG and EEG in the presurgical evaluation of 70 epilepsy patients.

    S. Knake;S. Knake;E. Halgren;H. Shiraishi;K. Hara

  • Stereotactic transcranial magnetic stimulation: correlation with direct electrical cortical stimulation.

    Krings T;Buchbinder Br;Butler We;Chiappa Kh

  • Tests of EEG localization accuracy using implanted sources in the human brain

    Cuffin Bn;Cohen D;Yunokuchi K;Maniewski R

  • A prospective trial of magnetic resonance–guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy for essential tremor: Results at the 2-year follow-up

    Jin Woo Chang;Chang Kyu Park;Nir Lipsman;Michael L Schwartz

  • Deficits in visual cognition and attention following bilateral anterior cingulotomy

    Kevin N Ochsner;Stephen M Kosslyn;G.Rees Cosgrove;Edwin H Cassem

  • Magnetic resonance image-guided stereotactic cingulotomy for intractable psychiatric disease.

    Spangler Wj;Cosgrove Gr;Ballantine Ht;Cassem Eh

  • Visually guided movements suppress subthalamic oscillations in Parkinson's disease patients

    Ramin Amirnovin;Ziv M. Williams;G. Rees Cosgrove;Emad N. Eskandar

  • Advances in Neurology, Vol. 63: Electrical and Magnetic Stimulation of the Brain and Spinal Cord

    G. Rees Cosgrove

Frequent Co-Authors

Emad N. Eskandar
Emad N. Eskandar Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Darin D. Dougherty
Darin D. Dougherty Harvard University
Scott L. Rauch
Scott L. Rauch McLean Hospital
Sydney S. Cash
Sydney S. Cash Harvard University
Joseph R. Madsen
Joseph R. Madsen Boston Children's Hospital
Andrew J. Cole
Andrew J. Cole Harvard University
Andres M. Lozano
Andres M. Lozano University of Toronto
Andrew A. Nierenberg
Andrew A. Nierenberg Harvard University
Wilson Truccolo
Wilson Truccolo Brown University
Leigh R. Hochberg
Leigh R. Hochberg Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in neuroscience opens doors to a variety of related fields and educational opportunities. Those interested in mental health might consider pursuing online psyd clinical psychology programs, which offer advanced training for clinical practice and research roles. These programs are ideal for students looking to deepen their understanding of psychology within a flexible, online format.

Another pathway worth considering is licensure in marriage and family therapy. For those seeking a faster route, lmft programs can lead to rewarding opportunities in counseling and therapy, focusing on relationships and family dynamics. Many of these programs are offered online to accommodate busy schedules.

If you’re looking to enter the workforce quickly, 2 year accelerated bachelor degrees online provide a fast-track option to earn a college degree. These programs are efficient and flexible, perfect for driven students eager to begin their careers sooner.

When evaluating your education options, it’s also essential to consider potential earnings and job outlook. Review the best bachelor's degrees for high-paying careers and growth potential, ensuring your chosen pathway aligns with your professional and financial goals.

Best Scientists Citing G. Rees Cosgrove

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles