World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Guadalupe Williams-Linera

Guadalupe Williams-Linera

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
39
Citations
6115
World Ranking
6374
National Ranking
26

Guadalupe Williams-Linera publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guadalupe Williams-Linera sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 89 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Guadalupe Williams-Linera D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guadalupe Williams-Linera sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Guadalupe Williams-Linera is affiliated with the Instituto de Ecología in Mexico and conducts research primarily in environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences. Their work spans several subfields including nature and landscape conservation, global and planetary change, ecology, evolution, behavior and systematics, plant science, and ecological modeling.

Their research topics cover a diverse range of areas in ecology and vegetation dynamics studies, forest ecology and management, plant water relations and carbon dynamics, plant and animal studies, forest management and policy, effects of fire on ecosystems, and conservation, biodiversity, and resource management.

Williams-Linera has published multiple papers, with notable recent works including:

  • Evaluating ecosystem service trade-offs along a land-use intensification gradient in central Veracruz, Mexico (2020) in Ecosystem Services
  • Biodiversity and carbon storage are correlated along a land use intensity gradient in a tropical montane forest watershed, Mexico (2020) in Basic and Applied Ecology
  • Litterfall, vegetation structure and tree composition as indicators of functional recovery in passive and active tropical cloud forest restoration (2021) in Forest Ecology and Management
  • Leaf functional traits predict shade tolerant tree performance in cloud forest restoration plantings (2022) in Journal of Applied Ecology
  • Landscape-scale forest cover drives the predictability of forest regeneration across the Neotropics (2023) in Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences

Their frequent collaborators include Milton H. Díaz-Toribio, Javier Tolome, Daniel M. Griffith, Jorge A. Meave, and Z. Carter Berry.

Williams-Linera's research is often published in journals such as the Journal of Tropical Ecology, Ecosystem Services, Basic and Applied Ecology, Forest Ecology and Management, and the Journal of Applied Ecology.

Best Publications

  • Vegetation structure and environmental conditions of forest edges in Panama.

    Guadalupe Williams-Linera

  • Biodiversity loss in Latin American coffee landscapes: review of the evidence on ants, birds, and trees.

    Stacy M. Philpott;Wayne J. Arendt;Inge Armbrecht;Peter Bichier

  • Anthropogenic disturbance and tree diversity in Montane Rain Forests in Chiapas, Mexico

    Neptalı́ Ramı́rez-Marcial;Mario González-Espinosa;Guadalupe Williams-Linera

  • Tree species richness complementarity, disturbance and fragmentation in a Mexican tropical montane cloud forest

    Guadalupe Williams-Linera

  • La fragmentación del bosque mesófilo de montaña y patrones de uso del suelo en la región oeste de Xalapa, Veracruz, México

    Guadalupe Williams-Linera;Robert H. Manson;Eduardo Isunza Vera

  • Microenvironment and Floristics of Different Edges in a Fragmented Tropical Rainforest

    G. Williams‐Linera;V. Domínguez‐Gastelú;M. E. García‐Zurita

  • Phenology of Deciduous and Broadleaved-Evergreen Tree Species in a Mexican Tropical Lower Montane Forest

    Guadalupe Williams-Linera

  • Phenology of temperate trees in tropical climates

    Rolf Borchert;Kevin Robertson;Mark D. Schwartz;Guadalupe Williams-Linera

  • Tree species diversity and vegetation structure in shade coffee farms in Veracruz, Mexico

    Ana M. López-Gómez;Guadalupe Williams-Linera;Robert H. Manson

  • Experimental Native Tree Seedling Establishment for the Restoration of a Mexican Cloud Forest

    Claudia Alvarez-Aquino;Guadalupe Williams-Linera;Adrian C. Newton

  • Distance effect from cloud forest fragments on plant community structure in abandoned pastures in Veracruz, Mexico

    Miguel Angel Muñiz-Castro;Guadalupe Williams-Linera;José María Rey Benayas

  • Origin and early development of forest edge vegetation in Panama

    Guadalupe Williams-Linera

  • How heterogeneous are the cloud forest communities in the mountains of central Veracruz, Mexico?

    Guadalupe Williams-Linera;María Toledo-Garibaldi;Claudia Gallardo Hernández

  • Local knowledge helps select species for forest restoration in a tropical dry forest of central Veracruz, Mexico

    Alfonso Suárez;Guadalupe Williams-Linera;Carlos Trejo;Juan Ignacio Valdez-Hernández

  • Litterfall, temperate and tropical dominant trees, and climate in a Mexican lower montane forest

    Guadalupe Williams-Linera;Javier Tolome

  • Evaluation of native tree species for the rehabilitation of deforested areas in a Mexican cloud forest

    R.A. Pedraza;G. Williams-Linera

  • Tree species diversity driven by environmental and anthropogenic factors in tropical dry forest fragments of central Veracruz, Mexico

    Guadalupe Williams-Linera;Francisco Lorea

  • Patterns of macromycete community assemblage along an elevation gradient: options for fungal gradient and metacommunity analyse

    Marko Gómez-Hernández;Guadalupe Williams-Linera;Roger Guevara;D. Jean Lodge

  • Long-Term Impacts of Fuelwood Extraction on a Tropical Montane Cloud Forest

    Nadja Rüger;Guadalupe Williams-Linera;W. Daniel Kissling;W. Daniel Kissling;Andreas Huth

  • Distribution and stand characteristics of relict populations of Mexican beech (Fagus grandifolia var. mexicana)

    Guadalupe Williams-Linera;Adèle Rowden;Adrian C. Newton

Frequent Co-Authors

Adrian C. Newton
Adrian C. Newton James Hutton Institute
Juan J. Armesto
Juan J. Armesto Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
Luis Cayuela
Luis Cayuela King Juan Carlos University
Antonio Lara
Antonio Lara Austral University of Chile
José María Rey Benayas
José María Rey Benayas University of Alcalá
Andreas Huth
Andreas Huth Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Heidi Asbjornsen
Heidi Asbjornsen University of New Hampshire
Davide Geneletti
Davide Geneletti University of Trento
James W. Dalling
James W. Dalling University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
W. Daniel Kissling
W. Daniel Kissling University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Ecology and Evolution can lead you into diverse and rewarding fields that value broad scientific knowledge and strong research skills. Similar to these disciplines, interdisciplinary studies degrees offer flexibility in combining science, policy, and humanities courses. For those seeking budget-friendly options, check out cheap online interdisciplinary studies degree options to kickstart your academic journey affordably.

Graduates often pursue advanced roles by building expertise in related areas. If you’re interested in understanding historical environmental changes or the impact of human activity, an online masters in history can add valuable context to your ecological studies. Alternatively, science communication remains crucial in this sector. Those drawn to information management might explore what schools offer library science degrees for a pathway in archival research or data stewardship.

Careers in allied health, such as speech and language pathology, also interface with evolutionary biology and cognitive development. If this interests you, consider asha accredited slp programs, which combine scientific training with clinical skills. Together, these online degree options nurture broad skill sets that can enhance professional growth in the dynamic fields connected to ecology and evolution.

Best Scientists Citing Guadalupe Williams-Linera

Trending Scientists