World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
6862
World Ranking
10158
National Ranking
4280

Andrew Begel publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew Begel sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 118 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Andrew Begel D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew Begel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - ACM Distinguished Member

Overview

Andrew Begel is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States. Their research spans a combination of computer science and social sciences, with particular attention to human-computer interaction, occupational therapy, and health professions.

The main subfields Begel has investigated include:

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Occupational Therapy
  • Safety Research
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Rehabilitation

Key topics of their work revolve around assistive technologies and accessibility, focusing on:

  • Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • Usability and User Interface Design
  • Disability Education and Employment
  • Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Begel include:

  • "A practical guide on conducting eye tracking studies in software engineering," 2020, Empirical Software Engineering
  • "Neurodiversity and the Accessible University: Exploring Organizational Barriers, Access Labor and Opportunities for Change," 2024, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • "Mixed Abilities and Varied Experiences: A Group Autoethnography of a Virtual Summer Internship," 2023, Communications of the ACM

Begel has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Zohreh Sharafi
  • Bonita Sharif
  • Yann-Gaël Guéhéneuc
  • Roman Bednarik
  • Martha E. Crosby

The scientist's work has been published repeatedly in venues such as:

  • Empirical Software Engineering
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • Communications of the ACM

Andrew Begel was awarded the ACM Distinguished Member honor in 2019, recognizing contributions within their field.

Best Publications

  • Software engineering for machine learning: a case study

    Saleema Amershi;Andrew Begel;Christian Bird;Robert DeLine

  • Usage and Perceptions of Agile Software Development in an Industrial Context: An Exploratory Study

    A. Begel;N. Nagappan

  • Using psycho-physiological measures to assess task difficulty in software development

    Thomas Fritz;Andrew Begel;Sebastian C. Müller;Serap Yigit-Elliott

  • Novice software developers, all over again

    Andrew Begel;Beth Simon

  • The emerging role of data scientists on software development teams

    Miryung Kim;Thomas Zimmermann;Robert DeLine;Andrew Begel

  • Codebook: discovering and exploiting relationships in software repositories

    Andrew Begel;Yit Phang Khoo;Thomas Zimmermann

  • Managing Duplicated Code with Linked Editing

    M. Toomim;A. Begel;S.L. Graham

  • Analyze this! 145 questions for data scientists in software engineering

    Andrew Begel;Thomas Zimmermann

  • Data Scientists in Software Teams: State of the Art and Challenges

    Miryung Kim;Thomas Zimmermann;Robert DeLine;Andrew Begel

  • BPF+: exploiting global data-flow optimization in a generalized packet filter architecture

    Andrew Begel;Steven McCanne;Susan L. Graham

  • Struggles of new college graduates in their first software development job

    Andrew Begel;Beth Simon

  • Social Networking Meets Software Development: Perspectives from GitHub, MSDN, Stack Exchange, and TopCoder

    A. Begel;J. Bosch;M-A Storey

  • Pair programming: what's in it for me?

    Andrew Begel;Nachiappan Nagappan

  • Eye movements in code reading: relaxing the linear order

    Teresa Busjahn;Roman Bednarik;Andrew Begel;Martha Crosby

  • Social media for software engineering

    Andrew Begel;Robert DeLine;Thomas Zimmermann

  • Eye Movements in Code Reading: Relaxing the Linear Order

    Unknown

  • LogoBlocks: A Graphical Programming Language for Interacting with the World

    Andrew Begel;Mitchel Resnick

  • Measuring neural efficiency of program comprehension

    Janet Siegmund;Norman Peitek;Chris Parnin;Sven Apel

  • Understanding the Challenges Faced by Neurodiverse Software Engineering Employees: Towards a More Inclusive and Productive Technical Workforce

    Meredith Ringel Morris;Andrew Begel;Ben Wiedermann

  • Cognitive Perspectives on the Role of Naming in Computer Programs

    Ben Liblit;Andrew Begel;Eve Sweetser

  • Improving Communication Between Pair Programmers Using Shared Gaze Awareness

    Sarah D'Angelo;Andrew Begel

  • A Survey of the Practice of Design -- Code Correspondence amongst Professional Software Engineers

    A. Nugroho;M.R.V. Chaudron

  • Appendix to Analyze This! 145 Questions for Data Scientists in Software Engineering

    Andrew Begel;Tom Zimmermann

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas Zimmermann
Thomas Zimmermann Microsoft (United States)
Robert DeLine
Robert DeLine Microsoft (United States)
Nachiappan Nagappan
Nachiappan Nagappan Facebook (United States)
Susan L. Graham
Susan L. Graham University of California, Berkeley
Miryung Kim
Miryung Kim University of California, Los Angeles
Walid Maalej
Walid Maalej Hasso Plattner Institute
Margaret-Anne Storey
Margaret-Anne Storey University of Victoria
Christoph Treude
Christoph Treude Singapore Management University
John C. Tang
John C. Tang Microsoft (United States)
Christian Bird
Christian Bird Microsoft (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of related degrees and career opportunities. Many students consider pursuing specialized fields online, not only for the flexibility but also due to lower total costs. For example, if you’re interested in intersecting disciplines, checking the mechanical engineering degree cost can help you plan your educational investment smartly.

A strong foundation in science is often beneficial. You might explore options like an online physics bachelor's degree, which can enhance your analytical and problem-solving skills valuable in tech fields.

Data-driven careers are in high demand, and earning a data science degree online is a popular choice for those interested in analytics, AI, and machine learning.

For advanced learners, an online master’s in electrical engineering degree positions graduates for cutting-edge roles in hardware, robotics, and telecommunications.

Exploring these related online degrees can diversify your skillset and expand your career pathways far beyond traditional computer science roles.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew Begel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles