World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
43
Citations
5465
World Ranking
8120
National Ranking
3478

Marouane Kessentini publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marouane Kessentini sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 188 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Marouane Kessentini D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marouane Kessentini sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marouane Kessentini is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their main field of study is Computer Science, with a substantial focus on Information Systems, Software, and Artificial Intelligence. Their research spans a variety of subfields including Computer Networks and Communications and Computer Science Applications.

Kessentini's work is concentrated on several key topics, including:

  • Software Engineering Research
  • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
  • Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Open Source Software Innovations
  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
  • Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services

The scientist has authored numerous papers published in well-known academic venues. The frequent publication venues where Kessentini's work has appeared include:

  • Information and Software Technology
  • IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan)
  • Automated Software Engineering
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Some of the recent notable papers authored by Kessentini cover a range of research topics and publication years:

  • "An Interactive and Dynamic Search-Based Approach to Software Refactoring Recommendations," 2020, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
  • "How we refactor and how we document it? On the use of supervised machine learning algorithms to classify refactoring documentation," 2020, Expert Systems with Applications
  • "NSGA-II as feature selection technique and AdaBoost classifier for COVID-19 prediction using patient's symptoms," 2021, Nonlinear Dynamics
  • "Considering dependencies between bug reports to improve bugs triage," 2021, Automated Software Engineering
  • "Multi-objective code reviewer recommendations: balancing expertise, availability and collaborations," 2020, Automated Software Engineering

Throughout their career, Kessentini has collaborated frequently with several co-authors. Some of the most common collaborators include:

  • Thiago Ferreira
  • Chaima Abid
  • Vahid Alizadeh
  • Ruchika Malhotra
  • Rick Kazman

Best Publications

  • Many-Objective Software Remodularization Using NSGA-III

    Wiem Mkaouer;Marouane Kessentini;Adnan Shaout;Patrice Koligheu

  • Maintainability defects detection and correction: a multi-objective approach

    Ali Ouni;Marouane Kessentini;Houari Sahraoui;Mounir Boukadoum

  • Multi-Criteria Code Refactoring Using Search-Based Software Engineering: An Industrial Case Study

    Ali Ouni;Marouane Kessentini;Houari Sahraoui;Katsuro Inoue

  • A Cooperative Parallel Search-Based Software Engineering Approach for Code-Smells Detection

    Wael Kessentini;Marouane Kessentini;Houari A. Sahraoui;Slim Bechikh

  • Design Defects Detection and Correction by Example

    Marouane Kessentini;Wael Kessentini;Houari Sahraoui;Mounir Boukadoum

  • Model Transformation as an Optimization Problem

    Marouane Kessentini;Houari Sahraoui;Mounir Boukadoum

  • Search-Based Web Service Antipatterns Detection

    Ali Ouni;Marouane Kessentini;Katsuro Inoue;Mel O Cinneide

  • Recommendation system for software refactoring using innovization and interactive dynamic optimization

    Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer;Marouane Kessentini;Slim Bechikh;Kalyanmoy Deb

  • Search-based software library recommendation using multi-objective optimization

    Ali Ouni;Raula Gaikovina Kula;Marouane Kessentini;Takashi Ishio

  • Code-Smell Detection as a Bilevel Problem

    Dilan Sahin;Marouane Kessentini;Slim Bechikh;Kalyanmoy Deb

  • Search-based model transformation by example

    Marouane Kessentini;Houari Sahraoui;Mounir Boukadoum;Omar Ben Omar

  • High dimensional search-based software engineering: finding tradeoffs among 15 objectives for automating software refactoring using NSGA-III

    Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer;Marouane Kessentini;Slim Bechikh;Kalyanmoy Deb

  • Chapter Four – Preference Incorporation in Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art

    Slim Bechikh;Marouane Kessentini;Lamjed Ben Said;Khaled Ghédira

  • On the use of many quality attributes for software refactoring: a many-objective search-based software engineering approach

    Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer;Marouane Kessentini;Slim Bechikh;Mel Oź CinneźIde

  • Deviance from perfection is a better criterion than closeness to evil when identifying risky code

    Marouane Kessentini;Stéphane Vaucher;Houari Sahraoui

  • Search-based refactoring: Towards semantics preservation

    Ali Ouni;Marouane Kessentini;Houari Sahraoui;Mohamed Salah Hamdi

  • Web Service Antipatterns Detection Using Genetic Programming

    Ali Ouni;Raula Gaikovina Kula;Marouane Kessentini;Katsuro Inoue

  • Improving multi-objective code-smells correction using development history

    Ali Ouni;Marouane Kessentini;Houari Sahraoui;Katsuro Inoue

  • Many-Objective Software Remodularization using NSGA-III

    Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer;Marouane Kessentini;Adnan Shaout;Patrice Koligheu

  • A robust multi-objective approach to balance severity and importance of refactoring opportunities

    Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer;Marouane Kessentini;Mel Ó. Cinnéide;Shinpei Hayashi

  • Multi-view refactoring of class and activity diagrams using a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm

    Usman Mansoor;Marouane Kessentini;Manuel Wimmer;Kalyanmoy Deb

Frequent Co-Authors

Ali Ouni
Ali Ouni École de Technologie Supérieure
Houari Sahraoui
Houari Sahraoui University of Montreal
Manuel Wimmer
Manuel Wimmer Johannes Kepler University of Linz
Slim Bechikh
Slim Bechikh University of Nottingham
Kalyanmoy Deb
Kalyanmoy Deb Michigan State University
Katsuro Inoue
Katsuro Inoue Ritsumeikan University
Federica Sarro
Federica Sarro University College London
Tim Menzies
Tim Menzies North Carolina State University
Rick Kazman
Rick Kazman University of Hawaii at Manoa
Gabriele Bavota
Gabriele Bavota Universita della Svizzera Italiana

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to many related disciplines and career opportunities. Students interested in expanding their skillset may find value in pursuing fields like engineering, data science, or physics, many of which now offer flexible online degree options.

For those drawn to the engineering side, pursuing an online degree for mechanical engineering provides a practical foundation in design, manufacturing, and problem-solving—all highly relevant to computer science applications.

Similarly, if you are interested in the theoretical aspects of science, a bachelor of science in physics online can deepen your understanding of algorithms, programming, and data analysis.

Data science is another popular pathway combining computing, statistics, and business insight. If cost is a concern, you can explore what is the cheapest data science course in the us? to find affordable programs that fit your budget.

Finally, those seeking expertise in circuitry and digital systems can look into online electrical engineering courses USA. These options broaden your career prospects in diverse technology sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Marouane Kessentini

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles