World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
72
Citations
13663
World Ranking
1264
National Ranking
465

Thomas C. Baker publications per year

1974: 1 publications 1975: 3 publications 1976: 5 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 4 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 7 publications 1982: 8 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 9 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 7 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 9 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 1 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 1 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 2 publications
1974 2025

252 publications in total across all disciplines

Thomas C. Baker publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas C. Baker sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 233 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Thomas C. Baker D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas C. Baker sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas C. Baker is affiliated with Pennsylvania State University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on social sciences, with an emphasis on sociology, political science, and gender studies. The breadth of their work covers diverse topics including criminal justice, crime patterns, policing practices, sports, and digital media.

The primary fields of study associated with their publications include:

  • Social Sciences

Within these fields, their subfields of interest are:

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Gender Studies
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Marketing

The main topics of their research encompass:

  • Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Sports, Gender, and Society
  • Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
  • Digital Games and Media

Thomas C. Baker has published frequently in several scholarly venues including:

  • Journal of Criminal Justice
  • Sport Management Review
  • International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Crime & Delinquency

Their recent scholarly articles include:

  • "Breaking the glass monitor: examining the underrepresentation of women in esports environments," 2021, Sport Management Review
  • "There is no nil in NIL: examining the social media value of student-athletes' names, images, and likeness," 2021, Sport Management Review
  • "Identifying critical factors in sport consumption decision making of millennial sport fans: mixed-methods approach," 2020, European Sport Management Quarterly
  • "Mediating effect of esports content live streaming in the relationship between esports recreational gameplay and esports event broadcast," 2020, Sport Business and Management An International Journal
  • "The New Wave of Influencers: Examining College Athlete Identities and the Role of Homophily and Parasocial Relationships in Leveraging Name, Image, and Likeness," 2023, Journal of Sport Management

Collaborative relationships form an important part of their academic activity, frequently coauthoring with:

  • Jill A. Gordon
  • Matthias van Hall
  • James V. Ray
  • Anja Dirkzwager
  • Paul Nieuwbeerta

Best Publications

  • An assessment of the relationship between service quality and customer satisfaction in the formation of consumers' purchase intentions

    Steven A. Taylor;Thomas L. Baker

  • Effects of supplier market orientation on distributor market orientation and the channel relationship: The distributor perspective

    Judy A. Siguaw;Penny M. Simpson;Thomas L. Baker

  • A triadic framework for collaborative consumption (CC): Motives, activities and resources & capabilities of actors

    Sabine Benoit;Thomas L. Baker;Ruth N. Bolton;Thorsten Gruber

  • The Impact of Suppliers’ Perceptions of Reseller Market Orientation on Key Relationship Constructs

    Thomas L. Baker;Penny M. Simpson;Judy A. Siguaw

  • Perceived customer showrooming behavior and the effect on retail salesperson self-efficacy and performance

    Adam Rapp;Thomas L. Baker;Daniel G. Bachrach;Jessica Ogilvie

  • Promoting ethical behavior and organizational citizenship behaviors: The influence of corporate ethical values

    Thomas L. Baker;Tammy G. Hunt;Martha C. Andrews

  • Odor detection in insects: volatile codes.

    M. De Bruyne;Thomas Charles Baker

  • Reiterative responses to single strands of odor promote sustained upwind flight and odor source location by moths.

    Neil J. Vickers;Thomas C. Baker

  • Sexual Communication with Pheromones

    Ring T. Cardé;Thomas C. Baker

  • Sexual communication with pheromones

    Rt. Carde;Tc. Baker

  • Odour-plume dynamics influence the brain's olfactory code.

    Neil J. Vickers;Neil J. Vickers;Thomas A. Christensen;Thomas C. Baker;John G. Hildebrand

  • Functional morphology of antennal chemoreceptors of the parasitoid Microplitis croceipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae).

    S.A Ochieng;K.C Park;J.W Zhu;T.C Baker

  • Olfactory Reactions of the Twelve-Spotted Lady Beetle, Coleomegilla maculata and the Green Lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea to Semiochemicals Released from Their Prey and Host Plant: Electroantennogram and Behavioral Responses

    Junwei Zhu;Allard A. Cossé;Allard A. Cossé;John J. Obrycki;Kyung Saeng Boo

  • Scents and Eversible Scent Structures of Male Moths

    M. C. Birch;G. M. Poppy;T. C. Baker

  • Analysis of Pheromone-Mediated Behaviors in Male Grapholitha molesta, the Oriental Fruit Moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)

    Thomas C. Baker;Ring T. Cardé

  • Host plant volatiles synergize responses of sex pheromone-specific olfactory receptor neurons in male Helicoverpa zea

    Ochieng Sa;Park Kc;Baker Tc

  • Two sex pheromone components of the tobacco budworm moth, Heliothis virescens.

    Wendell L. Roelofs;Ada S. Hill;Ring T. Carde;Thomas C. Baker

  • A pulsed cloud of sex pheromone elicits upwind flight in male moths

    T. C. Baker;M. A. Willis;K. F. Haynes;P. L. Phelan

  • Effects of intermittent and continuous pheromone stimulation on the flight behaviour of the oriental fruit moth, Grapholita molesta

    Mark A. Willis;Thomas C. Baker

  • The role of brand communications on front line service employee beliefs, behaviors, and performance

    Thomas L. Baker;Adam Rapp;Tracy Meyer;Ryan Mullins

  • IDENTIFICATION OF A FOUR-COMPONENT SEX PHEROMONE OF THE FEMALE ORIENTAL FRUIT MOTH, Grapholitha molesta (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE)

    A. M. Cardé;Thomas Charles Baker;R. T. Cardé

  • Endogenous and exogenous factors affecting periodicities of female calling and male sex pheromone response in Grapholitha molesta (Busck)

    Thomas Charles Baker;Ring T. Cardé

  • Identification of odors from overripe mango that attract vinegar flies, Drosophila melanogaster.

    Junwei Zhu;Kye Chung Park;Thomas C. Baker

  • Hopkins' ‘host selection principle’, another nail in its coffin

    Unknown

  • Sex pheromone communication in the lepidoptera: New research progress

    Thomas Charles Baker

  • Close-Range Attraction of Female Oriental Fruit Moths to Herbal Scent of Male Hairpencils

    Thomas C. Baker;Ritsuo Nishida;Wendell L. Roelofs

  • Moth uses fine tuning for odour resolution

    Thomas Charles Baker;H. Y. Fadamiro;A. A. Cosse

  • Field and laboratory electroantennographic measurements of pheromone plume structure correlated with oriental fruit moth behaviour

    T. C. Baker;K. F. Haynes

Frequent Co-Authors

Wendell L. Roelofs
Wendell L. Roelofs Cornell University
Ring T. Cardé
Ring T. Cardé University of California, Riverside
Kenneth F. Haynes
Kenneth F. Haynes University of Kentucky
Charles E. Linn
Charles E. Linn Cornell University
Jocelyn G. Millar
Jocelyn G. Millar University of California, Riverside
James H. Tumlinson
James H. Tumlinson Pennsylvania State University
Bill S. Hansson
Bill S. Hansson Max Planck Society
Christer Löfstedt
Christer Löfstedt Lund University
John J. Obrycki
John J. Obrycki University of Kentucky
Akhlesh Lakhtakia
Akhlesh Lakhtakia Pennsylvania State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution opens doors to an array of interdisciplinary careers. Many students expand their expertise through online degrees, allowing for flexibility and diverse subject focus. For instance, a background in environmental sciences blends well with online architecture programs, particularly for those interested in sustainable design and green building solutions.

Quantitative skills are increasingly vital in ecological research and data analysis. Pursuing a math degree online can strengthen your capacity to model ecological systems and interpret biological patterns, making you a valuable candidate in both research and applied sciences.

Visual communication also plays a key role when presenting complex ecological information, making skills in design highly relevant. Those who enjoy creative fields can consider graphic design schools online to develop expertise in environmental visualization, infographics, and digital storytelling.

If you seek a broader educational experience combining multiple fields, look into online interdisciplinary studies tuition costs. Such programs allow you to tailor your coursework in science, policy, education, and communication—expanding your career pathways in ecology and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas C. Baker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles