World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
40
Citations
6525
World Ranking
6098
National Ranking
2075

Charles E. Linn publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles E. Linn sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 110 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Charles E. Linn D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles E. Linn sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Charles E. Linn is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily focusing on Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine. Within these fields, Linn's work notably covers Genetics, Insect Science, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics.

Linn's publications reveal a diverse range of topics, including insect behavior, pheromone research, neurobiology, and cardiac health. Key themes in their research encompass:

  • Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
  • Insect Pheromone Research and Control
  • Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Plant and Animal Studies
  • Insect and Pesticide Research
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics

Their recent scholarly contributions include studies published in various recognized venues, reflecting an interdisciplinary approach to both entomological and medical sciences. Noteworthy publication venues include:

  • Insects
  • Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata
  • Journal of Chemical Ecology
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Structural Heart

Some of their recent papers, illustrating the scope of their research, are:

  • Surface Properties and Architectures of Male Moth Trichoid Sensilla Investigated Using Atomic Force Microscopy, 2022, Insects
  • Habitat Cues Synergize to Elicit Chemically Mediated Landing Behavior in a Specialist Phytophagous Insect, the Grape Berry Moth, 2020, Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata
  • Pheromone Odorant Receptor Responses Reveal the Presence of a Cryptic, Redundant Sex Pheromone Component in the European Corn Borer, Ostrinia nubilalis, 2020, Journal of Chemical Ecology
  • ASSESSMENT OF PRIMARY MITRAL REGURGITATION SEVERITY BY 3D ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY: FEASIBILITY AND IMPACT ON CLINICAL OUTCOMES, 2025, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Impact of Eccentric Residual Mitral Regurgitation on Long-Term Survival After Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve Repair, 2025, Structural Heart

The collaboration network of Charles E. Linn features several frequent coauthors, indicating ongoing research partnerships. Frequent collaborators include:

  • Thomas C. Baker
  • C E Berg-Hansen
  • Rasmus Bach Sindre
  • Stig Urheim
  • Dana Cramariuc

Best Publications

  • Characterization of Drosophila tyramine beta-hydroxylase gene and isolation of mutant flies lacking octopamine.

    Maria Monastirioti;Charles E. Linn;Kalpana White

  • Evolution of moth sex pheromones via ancestral genes

    Wendell L. Roelofs;Weitian Liu;Guixia Hao;Hongmei Jiao

  • Fruit odor discrimination and sympatric host race formation in Rhagoletis

    Charles Linn;Jeffrey L. Feder;Satoshi Nojima;Hattie R. Dambroski

  • The role of neurohormonal octopamine during 'fight or flight' behaviour in the field cricket Gryllus bimaculatus.

    S A Adamo;C E Linn;R R Hoy

  • Single mutation to a sex pheromone receptor provides adaptive specificity between closely related moth species

    Gregory Patrick Leary;Jean E. Allen;Peggy L. Bunger;Jena B. Luginbill

  • Identification of a new blend of apple volatiles attractive to the apple maggot: Rhagoletis pomonella

    Aijun Zhang;Aijun Zhang;Charles Linn;Starker Wright;Ronald Prokopy

  • Sex pheromone receptor specificity in the European corn borer moth, Ostrinia nubilalis.

    Kevin W. Wanner;Andrew S. Nichols;Jean E. Allen;Peggy L. Bunger

  • Redundancy in a chemical signal: Behavioral responses of maleTrichoplusia ni to a 6-Component sex pheromone blend

    Linn Ce;Bjostad Lb;Du Jw;Roelofs Wl

  • Male moth sensitivity to multicomponent pheromones: Critical role of female-released blend in determining the functional role of components and active space of the pheromone.

    C. E. Linn;M. G. Campbell;W. L. Roelofs

  • Identification of new sex pheromone components inTrichoplusia ni, predicted from biosynthetic precursors.

    L. B. Bjostad;C. E. Linn;J. W. Du;W. L. Roelofs

  • Postzygotic isolating factor in sympatric speciation in Rhagoletis flies: Reduced response of hybrids to parental host-fruit odors

    Charles E. Linn;Hattie R. Dambroski;Jeffrey L. Feder;Stewart H. Berlocher

  • Pheromone components and active spaces: what do moths smell and where do they smell it?

    C. E. Linn;M. G. Campbell;W. L. Roelofs

  • Identification of host fruit volatiles from hawthorn (Crataegus spp.) attractive to hawthorn-origin Rhagoletis pomonella flies

    Satoshi Nojima;Charles Linn;Bruce Morris;Bruce Morris;Aijun Zhang

  • Modulatory effects of octopamine and serotonin on male sensitivity and periodicity of response to sex pheromone in the cabbage looper moth, Trichoplusia ni

    C. E. Linn;W. L. Roelofs

  • Sex pheromone blend discrimination in two races and hybrids of the European corn borer moth, Ostrinia nubilalis.

    Charles E. Linn;Maria S. Young;Matthew Gendle;Thomas J. Glover

  • The genetic basis for fruit odor discrimination in Rhagoletis flies and its significance for sympatric host shifts.

    Hattie R. Dambroski;Charles Linn;Stewart H. Berlocher;Andrew A. Forbes

  • Identification and Field Evaluation of Grape Shoot Volatiles Attractive to Female Grape Berry Moth (Paralobesia viteana)

    Dong H. Cha;Satoshi Nojima;Stephen P. Hesler;Aijun Zhang

  • Temperature modulation of behavioural thresholds controlling male moth sex pheromone response specificity

    C. E. Linn;M. G. Campbell;W. L. Roelofs

  • Effect of varying proportions of the alcohol component on sex pheromone blend discrimination in male Oriental fruit moths

    C. E. Linn;W. L. Roelofs

  • Eavesdropping on plant volatiles by a specialist moth: significance of ratio and concentration.

    Dong H. Cha;Charles E. Linn;Peter E. A. Teal;Aijun Zhang

  • Sex pheromone of the winter moth, a geometrid with unusually low temperature precopulatory responses.

    W. L. Roelofs;A. S. Hill;C. E. Linn;J. Meinwald

Frequent Co-Authors

Wendell L. Roelofs
Wendell L. Roelofs Cornell University
Jeffrey L. Feder
Jeffrey L. Feder University of Notre Dame
Thomas C. Baker
Thomas C. Baker Pennsylvania State University
Peter E. A. Teal
Peter E. A. Teal United States Department of Agriculture
David Held
David Held Durham University
Tracey Chapman
Tracey Chapman University of East Anglia
Daniel A. Potter
Daniel A. Potter University of Kentucky
Lukasz L. Stelinski
Lukasz L. Stelinski University of Florida
Herb S. Aldwinckle
Herb S. Aldwinckle Cornell University
Hugh M. Robertson
Hugh M. Robertson University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution can open the door to a range of interdisciplinary careers. Many students find that pairing this field with other areas of study can improve their job prospects and diversify their skill set. Consider accredited options such as the graphic design degree online for those interested in environmental communication or educational materials design.

If you’re seeking a flexible approach, the best value online interdisciplinary studies degrees allow you to combine courses in ecology, policy, and data analysis, appealing for students with broad interests. History enthusiasts may pursue an online history master's degree to gain deeper insights into environmental change over time and human impacts on ecosystems.

Career pathways can also include areas like information management for scientific institutions or museums. Programs such as the cheapest library science degree online equip graduates with critical skills for managing research data, archives, and educational resources.

With multiple online degrees available, students can pursue personalized and affordable paths that link ecology and evolution with unique industry opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Charles E. Linn

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles