World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Christopher C. J. Miller

Christopher C. J. Miller

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
70
Citations
21950
World Ranking
6907
National Ranking
526

Christopher C. J. Miller publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher C. J. Miller sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 162 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Christopher C. J. Miller D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher C. J. Miller sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Christopher C. J. Miller is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with significant contributions to the subfields of Molecular Biology, Neurology, Cell Biology, Physiology, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

The scientist's work encompasses several key topics including:

  • Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease
  • Alzheimer's Disease Research and Treatments
  • Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
  • Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders

Their recent publications highlight a focus on cellular mechanisms related to neurodegenerative diseases and mitochondrial function. Notable papers include:

  • "Nox4 regulates InsP 3 receptor-dependent Ca 2+ release into mitochondria to promote cell survival" (2020), published in The EMBO Journal
  • "Disruption of endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondria tethering proteins in post-mortem Alzheimer's disease brain" (2020), published in Neurobiology of Disease
  • "Disruption of ER-mitochondria tethering and signalling in C9orf72-associated amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia" (2022), published in Aging Cell
  • "The PTPIP51 coiled-coil domain is important in VAPB binding, formation of ER-mitochondria contacts and IP3 receptor delivery of Ca2+ to mitochondria" (2022), published in Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
  • "Disruption of the VAPB-PTPIP51 ER-mitochondria tethering proteins in post-mortem human amyotrophic lateral sclerosis" (2022), published in Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology

Christopher C. J. Miller frequently collaborates with several researchers including:

  • Gábor M. Mórotz
  • Andrea Markovinović
  • Patricia Gómez-Suaga
  • Sandra M. Martín-Guerrero
  • Wendy Noble

Their work has appeared in various scientific journals, with multiple publications in Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, Acta Neuropathologica Communications, SKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine, and The EMBO Journal.

Best Publications

  • TDP-43 Mutations in Familial and Sporadic Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

    Jemeen Sreedharan;Ian P. Blair;Vineeta B. Tripathi;Xun Hu

  • Mutations in FUS, an RNA Processing Protein, Cause Familial Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Type 6

    Caroline Vance;Boris Rogelj;Tibor Hortobágyi;Kurt J. De Vos

  • Role of Axonal Transport in Neurodegenerative Diseases

    Kurt J. De Vos;Andrew J. Grierson;Steven Ackerley;Christopher C. J. Miller

  • Evidence of widespread cerebral microglial activation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: an [11C](R)-PK11195 positron emission tomography study

    M R Turner;A Cagnin;F E Turkheimer;F E Turkheimer;Christopher Miller

  • ER–mitochondria associations are regulated by the VAPB–PTPIP51 interaction and are disrupted by ALS/FTD-associated TDP-43

    Radu Stoica;Kurt J. De Vos;Kurt J. De Vos;Sébastien Paillusson;Sarah Mueller

  • Alzheimer's disease-like phosphorylation of the microtubule-associated protein tau by glycogen synthase kinase-3 in transfected mammalian cells

    S Lovestone;C H Reynolds;D Latimer;Davis

  • VAPB interacts with the mitochondrial protein PTPIP51 to regulate calcium homeostasis

    Kurt J. De Vos;Gábor M. Mórotz;Radu Stoica;Elizabeth L. Tudor

  • The importance of tau phosphorylation for neurodegenerative diseases.

    Wendy Noble;Diane P. Hanger;Christopher C. J. Miller;Simon Lovestone

  • Familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-linked SOD1 mutants perturb fast axonal transport to reduce axonal mitochondria content

    Kurt J. De Vos;Kurt J. De Vos;Anna L. Chapman;Maria E. Tennant;Catherine Manser

  • There's Something Wrong with my MAM; the ER–Mitochondria Axis and Neurodegenerative Diseases

    Sebastien Paillusson;Radu Stoica;Patricia Gomez-Suaga;Dawn H.W. Lau

  • α-Synuclein binds to the ER–mitochondria tethering protein VAPB to disrupt Ca 2+ homeostasis and mitochondrial ATP production

    Sébastien Paillusson;Patricia Gomez-Suaga;Radu Stoica;Daniel Little

  • Cellular phosphorylation of tau by GSK-3 beta influences tau binding to microtubules and microtubule organisation

    Uta Wagner;Michelle Utton;Jean-Marc Gallo;Christopher C. J. Miller

  • The ER-Mitochondria Tethering Complex VAPB-PTPIP51 Regulates Autophagy

    Patricia Gomez-Suaga;Sebastien Paillusson;Radu Stoica;Wendy Noble

  • Overexpression of human wild-type FUS causes progressive motor neuron degeneration in an age- and dose-dependent fashion

    Jacqueline C. Mitchell;Philip McGoldrick;Caroline Vance;Tibor Hortobagyi

  • ALS mutant FUS disrupts nuclear localization and sequesters wild-type FUS within cytoplasmic stress granules

    Caroline Vance;Emma L. Scotter;Agnes L. Nishimura;Claire Troakes

  • Increasing microtubule acetylation rescues axonal transport and locomotor deficits caused by LRRK2 Roc-COR domain mutations

    Vinay K. Godena;Nicholas Brookes-Hocking;Annekathrin Moller;Gary Shaw

  • Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease neurofilament mutations disrupt neurofilament assembly and axonal transport

    Janet Brownlees;Steven Ackerley;Andrew J. Grierson;Nick J.O. Jacobsen

  • ALS/FTD-associated FUS activates GSK-3β to disrupt the VAPB–PTPIP51 interaction and ER–mitochondria associations

    Radu Stoica;Sébastien Paillusson;Patricia Gomez‐Suaga;Jacqueline C Mitchell

  • Neurofilament heavy chain side arm phosphorylation regulates axonal transport of neurofilaments

    Steven Ackerley;Paul Thornhill;Andrew J. Grierson;Janet Brownlees

  • Supporting Online Material for Mutations in FUS, an RNA Processing Protein, Cause Familial Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Type 6

    Caroline Vance;Boris Rogelj;Tibor Hortobágyi;Kurt J. De Vos

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher Shaw
Christopher Shaw King's College London
Brian H. Anderton
Brian H. Anderton King's College London
P. Nigel Leigh
P. Nigel Leigh Brighton and Sussex Medical School
Wendy Noble
Wendy Noble King's College London
Jonathan D. Cooper
Jonathan D. Cooper Washington University in St. Louis
Diane P. Hanger
Diane P. Hanger King's College London
Pang-Chui Shaw
Pang-Chui Shaw Chinese University of Hong Kong
Tibor Hortobágyi
Tibor Hortobágyi University of Debrecen
Ammar Al-Chalabi
Ammar Al-Chalabi King's College London
Garth A. Nicholson
Garth A. Nicholson University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Biology or Biochemistry opens doors to a wide range of online study and career options in health, nutrition, and medical technology. Many students consider pursuing an online nutrition masters to deepen their understanding of diet, health, and metabolic processes—skills increasingly in demand in clinics, research settings, and health organizations.

Tech-driven healthcare careers are also accessible through programs like online sonography certificate programs and accelerated radiology tech programs online. These certifications can be completed quickly and offer strong job prospects in medical imaging and diagnostics, fields that often employ graduates with biology or biochemistry backgrounds.

For those with a passion for food science and public health, exploring the best dietetics masters programs provides a bridge to careers in clinical nutrition, corporate wellness, and health policy. Choosing the right online program can help you align your interests in biology or biochemistry with flexible career pathways in rapidly evolving health sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Christopher C. J. Miller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles