World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
46
Citations
9524
World Ranking
5098
National Ranking
338

Mark S. Young publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark S. Young sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 123 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Mark S. Young D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark S. Young sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark S. Young is affiliated with the University of Southampton in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple areas within medicine and psychology, with a focus on the intersection of human factors, safety, and healthcare technologies.

Their recent published papers include:

  • "Young Adults' Electronic Cigarette Use and Perceptions of Risk," 2023, Tobacco Use Insights
  • "Injuries in England and Wales elite men's domestic cricket: A nine season review from 2010 to 2018," 2020, Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
  • "Making ergonomics accountable: Reliability, validity and utility in ergonomics methods," 2021, Applied Ergonomics
  • "The Chartered Institute of Ergonomics and Human Factors at 75: perspectives on contemporary challenges and future directions for Ergonomics and Human Factors," 2024, Ergonomics
  • "Academic electronic health records as a vehicle to augment the assessment of patient care skills in the didactic pharmacy curriculum," 2020, Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning

Their frequent co-authors are:

  • Minji Sohn
  • Patrick Waterson
  • Shelby Kelsh
  • Anne Ottney
  • Edward D. Gomperts

Mark S. Young has published regularly in notable venues, including:

  • Applied Ergonomics
  • Ergonomics
  • Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning
  • Tobacco Use Insights
  • Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

Their main fields of study are Medicine and Psychology. Subfields of research include:

  • Social Psychology
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery

Mark S. Young's work covers a range of topics, notably:

  • Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Safety Warnings and Signage
  • Occupational Health and Safety Research
  • Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
  • Ergonomics and Human Factors
  • Heme Oxygenase-1 and Carbon Monoxide
  • Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation

Best Publications

  • State of science: mental workload in ergonomics

    Mark S. Young;Karel A. Brookhuis;Christopher D. Wickens;Peter A. Hancock

  • Distributed situation awareness in dynamic systems: theoretical development and application of an ergonomics methodology

    Neville Anthony Stanton;Rebecca Stewart;Don M Harris;Robert Houghton

  • Malleable attentional resources theory: A new explanation for the effects of mental underload on performance

    Mark S. Young;Neville A. Stanton

  • What really is going on? Review of situation awareness models for individuals and teams

    Paul Matthew Salmon;Neville Anthony Stanton;Guy H Walker;C Baber

  • Measuring Situation Awareness in complex systems: Comparison of measures study

    Paul Salmon;Neville Anthony Stanton;Guy Walker;Daniel P Jenkins

  • Driver behaviour with adaptive cruise control

    Neville A. Stanton;Mark S. Young

  • Guide to Methodology in Ergonomics: Designing for Human Use

    Neville A. Stanton;Mark S. Young

  • Drive-by-wire: The case of driver workload and reclaiming control with adaptive cruise control

    Neville A. Stanton;M. Young;B McCaulder

  • Safe driving in a green world: A review of driver performance benchmarks and technologies to support 'smart' driving

    Mark S. Young;Stewart A. Birrell;Neville A. Stanton

  • Attention and automation: New perspectives on mental underload and performance

    Mark S. Young;Neville A. Stanton

  • Vehicle automation and driving performance

    N. A. Stanton;M. S. Young

  • Back to the future: Brake reaction times for manual and automated vehicles

    Mark S. Young;Neville A. Stanton

  • Students Pay Attention! Combating the Vigilance Decrement to Improve Learning during Lectures.

    Mark S. Young;Stephanie Robinson;Phil Alberts

  • What's skill got to do with it? Vehicle Automation and driver mental workload

    Mark S. Young;Neville A. Stanton

  • Cooperation between drivers and automation: implications for safety

    Jean-Michel Hoc;Mark S. Young;Jean-Marc Blosseville

  • A proposed psychological model of driving automation

    Neville A. Stanton;Mark S. Young

  • Using SHERPA to predict design-induced error on the flight deck

    Don M Harris;Neville Anthony Stanton;Andrew Marshall;Mark S Young

  • Conflicts of interest: The implications of roadside advertising for driver attention

    Mark S. Young;Janina M. Mahfoud;Neville A. Stanton;Paul M. Salmon

  • WHERE IS COMPUTING DRIVING CARS

    Guy H. Walker;Neville A. Stanton;Mark. S. Young

  • Driving automation: Learning from aviation about design philosophies

    Mark S. Young;Neville A. Stanton;Deneen Harris

  • Kodak's Ergonomic Design for People at Work

    Mark S. Young

  • Guide to Methodology in Ergonomics: Designing for Human Use, Second Edition

    Neville A. Stanton;Mark S. Young;Catherine Harvey

Frequent Co-Authors

Neville A. Stanton
Neville A. Stanton University of Southampton
Guy H. Walker
Guy H. Walker Heriot-Watt University
Paul M. Salmon
Paul M. Salmon University of the Sunshine Coast
Chris Baber
Chris Baber University of Birmingham
Sidney Dekker
Sidney Dekker Griffith University
David Bunce
David Bunce University of Leeds
G. David Batty
G. David Batty University College London
Wendy S. Slutske
Wendy S. Slutske University of Missouri
Peter A. Hancock
Peter A. Hancock University of Central Florida
Ana Adan
Ana Adan University of Barcelona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Mark S. Young

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles