World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
128
Citations
74949
World Ranking
2674
National Ranking
1494

Peter A. McCullough publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter A. McCullough sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 910 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Peter A. McCullough D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter A. McCullough sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 128 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter A. McCullough is affiliated with Baylor University Medical Center in the United States and has a significant body of research primarily in the field of Medicine. Their work spans across several subfields including Infectious Diseases, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Neurology, and Nephrology.

The scientist has contributed extensively to research related to COVID-19, focusing on various clinical aspects and long-term effects. Key topics covered in their work include:

  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Viral Infections and Immunology Research
  • Dialysis and Renal Disease Management

Selected recent publications illustrate the focus and scope of their research:

  • Factors Associated With Death in Critically Ill Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 in the US (2020), published in JAMA Internal Medicine
  • Association Between Early Treatment With Tocilizumab and Mortality Among Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19 (2020), published in JAMA Internal Medicine
  • Characteristics and Outcomes of Individuals With Pre-existing Kidney Disease and COVID-19 Admitted to Intensive Care Units in the United States (2020), published in American Journal of Kidney Diseases
  • Vadadustat in Patients with Anemia and Non-Dialysis-Dependent CKD (2021), published in New England Journal of Medicine
  • Endothelial dysfunction contributes to COVID-19-associated vascular inflammation and coagulopathy (2020), published in Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine

Frequent collaborators in their research include Gaetano Maria De Ferrari, Robert Stoler, Jeffrey Schussler, William C. Roberts, and Ari Cedars.

Publication activity is often seen in journals such as:

  • The American Journal of Cardiology
  • Preprints.org
  • Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Cardiorenal Medicine
  • The American Journal of Medicine

Best Publications

  • Kidney disease as a risk factor for development of cardiovascular disease: a statement from the American Heart Association Councils on Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease, High Blood Pressure Research, Clinical Cardiology, and Epidemiology and Prevention.

    Mark J. Sarnak;Andrew S. Levey;Anton C. Schoolwerth;Josef Coresh

  • Rapid measurement of B-type natriuretic peptide in the emergency diagnosis of heart failure.

    Alan S. Maisel;Padma Krishnaswamy;Richard M. Nowak;James McCord

  • Acute Renal Failure After Coronary Intervention: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Relationship to Mortality

    Peter A McCullough;Robert Wolyn;Leslie L Rocher;Robert N Levin

  • B-type natriuretic peptide and clinical judgment in emergency diagnosis of heart failure: analysis from Breathing Not Properly (BNP) Multinational Study.

    Peter A. McCullough;Richard M. Nowak;James McCord;Judd E. Hollander

  • Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury

    Peter A. McCullough

  • Cardio-renal syndromes: report from the consensus conference of the acute dialysis quality initiative.

    Claudio Ronco;Peter R. McCullough;Stefan D. Anker;Inder Anand

  • Combined Angiotensin Inhibition for the Treatment of Diabetic Nephropathy

    Linda F. Fried;Nicholas Emanuele;Nicholas Emanuele;Jane H. Zhang;Mary Brophy

  • Discovery and validation of cell cycle arrest biomarkers in human acute kidney injury.

    Kianoush B Kashani;Ali Al-Khafaji;Thomas Ardiles;Antonio Artigas

  • K/DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines on Hypertension and Antihypertensive Agents in Chronic Kidney Disease

    Andrew S. Levey;Michael V. Rocco;Sharon Anderson;Sharon P. Andreoli

  • Cardiovascular disease in chronic kidney disease. A clinical update from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO)

    Charles A. Herzog;Charles A. Herzog;Richard W. Asinger;Richard W. Asinger;Alan K. Berger;David M. Charytan

  • Routine vs Selective Invasive Strategies in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Collaborative Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials

    Shamir R. Mehta;Christopher P. Cannon;Keith A. A. Fox;Lars Wallentin

  • Cardiorenal Syndrome: Classification, Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment Strategies: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

    Janani Rangaswami;Vivek Bhalla;John E A Blair;Tara I Chang

  • Confirmation of a heart failure epidemic: findings from the Resource Utilization Among Congestive Heart Failure (REACH) study

    Peter A McCullough;Edward F Philbin;John A Spertus;Scott Kaatz

  • B-type natriuretic peptide and renal function in the diagnosis of heart failure: an analysis from the Breathing Not Properly Multinational Study.

    Peter A. McCullough;Philippe Duc;Torbjørn Omland;James McCord

  • Fenoldopam Mesylate for the Prevention of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Gregg W. Stone;Peter A. McCullough;James A. Tumlin;Norman E. Lepor

  • Bedside B-Type natriuretic peptide in the emergency diagnosis of heart failure with reduced or preserved ejection fraction: Results from the Breathing Not Properly Multinational Study☆

    Alan S Maisel;James McCord;Richard M Nowak;Judd E Hollander

  • Primary results of the Rapid Emergency Department Heart Failure Outpatient Trial (REDHOT). A multicenter study of B-type natriuretic peptide levels, emergency department decision making, and outcomes in patients presenting with shortness of breath.

    Alan Maisel;Judd E. Hollander;David Guss;Peter McCullough

  • Risk prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy

    Peter A. McCullough;Andy Adam;Christoph R. Becker;Charles J Davidson

  • Monitoring clinical changes in patients with heart failure: a comparison of methods.

    John Spertus;Eric Peterson;Mark W. Conard;Paul A. Heidenreich

  • Behavioral predictors of weight regain after bariatric surgery.

    Jacqueline Odom;Kerstyn C. Zalesin;Tamika L. Washington;Wendy W. Miller

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan S. Maisel
Alan S. Maisel University of California, San Diego
Claudio Ronco
Claudio Ronco University of Padua
George L. Bakris
George L. Bakris University of Chicago
William T. Abraham
William T. Abraham The Ohio State University
Judd E. Hollander
Judd E. Hollander Thomas Jefferson University
Keith C. Norris
Keith C. Norris University of California, Los Angeles
Torbjørn Omland
Torbjørn Omland Akershus University Hospital
Barry A. Franklin
Barry A. Franklin Oakland University
Alan H.B. Wu
Alan H.B. Wu University of California, San Francisco
Paul Clopton
Paul Clopton Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are exploring careers related to Medicine in the USA, online degrees can open diverse pathways in healthcare and allied fields. For those interested in nutrition and wellness, a nutritionist online degree can prepare you for roles in health education, dietary planning, or nutritional counseling.

For aspiring healthcare managers, pursuing top online mha programs that are cahme accredited ensures your master’s in health administration meets strict academic standards, boosting your career prospects in hospital management and healthcare policy.

Registered nurses looking to advance their credentials can benefit from online rn to bsn no clinicals options, which are flexible and designed for working professionals. For nurses seeking the highest qualification, accelerated dnp programs offer a faster track to leadership and advanced practice roles.

Whether your interests lie in direct patient care, healthcare leadership, or wellness, these online degree options provide modern, accessible pathways for building a fulfilling healthcare career.

Best Scientists Citing Peter A. McCullough

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles