World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
87
Citations
29216
World Ranking
332
National Ranking
112

Scott J. Hollister publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott J. Hollister sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 265 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Scott J. Hollister D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott J. Hollister sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2007 - Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE)

Overview

Scott J. Hollister is affiliated with the Georgia Institute of Technology in the United States. Their research spans several interdisciplinary fields, primarily focusing on Medicine, Engineering, and Materials Science. Within these areas, their work delves into specialized subfields including Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Biomaterials, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Automotive Engineering.

The scientist's research addresses a range of topics centered on tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, emphasizing materials and technologies with biomedical applications. Main topics of interest include:

  • Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
  • Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
  • Polymer Composites and Self-Healing
  • Tracheal and Airway Disorders
  • Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Cellular and Composite Structures

Frequent publication venues for their research include Biomaterials, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Advanced Functional Materials, Acta Biomaterialia, and the Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials.

Some recent publications include:

  • Designing Biodegradable Shape Memory Polymers for Tissue Repair, 2020, Advanced Functional Materials
  • 3D bioprinting of a trachea-mimetic cellular construct of a clinically relevant size, 2021, Biomaterials
  • Wireless sensor enables longitudinal monitoring of regenerative niche mechanics during rehabilitation that enhance bone repair, 2020, Bone
  • In vitro fatigue behavior and in vivo osseointegration of the auxetic porous bone screw, 2023, Acta Biomaterialia
  • Innovative design of minimal invasive biodegradable poly(glycerol-dodecanoate) nucleus pulposus scaffold with function regeneration, 2023, Nature Communications

Collaborations have been a significant aspect of their research career. Frequent co-authors include Harsha Ramaraju, Sarah J. Crotts, Adam Verga, Lizhen Wang, and Sarah Jo Tucker, reflecting ongoing partnerships across various studies.

Scott J. Hollister's contributions have been recognized with the honor of being named a Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE) in 2007.

Best Publications

  • Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering

    Scott J. Hollister

  • Bone tissue engineering using polycaprolactone scaffolds fabricated via selective laser sintering.

    Jessica M. Williams;Adebisi Adewunmi;Rachel M. Schek;Colleen L. Flanagan

  • Optimal design and fabrication of scaffolds to mimic tissue properties and satisfy biological constraints.

    S.J. Hollister;R.D. Maddox;J.M. Taboas

  • Indirect Solid Free Form Fabrication of Local and Global Porous, Biomimetic and Composite 3D Polymer-Ceramic Scaffolds

    J.M Taboas;R.D Maddox;P.H Krebsbach;S.J Hollister

  • A comparison of homogenization and standard mechanics analyses for periodic porous composites

    Scott J. Hollister;Noboru Kikuchi

  • Mechanical and in vivo performance of hydroxyapatite implants with controlled architectures

    T.-M.Gabriel Chu;David G. Orton;Scott J. Hollister;Stephen E. Feinberg

  • Mitigation of tracheobronchomalacia with 3D-printed personalized medical devices in pediatric patients.

    Robert J. Morrison;Scott J. Hollister;Matthew F. Niedner;Maryam Ghadimi Mahani

  • A novel method for biomaterial scaffold internal architecture design to match bone elastic properties with desired porosity.

    Cheng Yu Lin;Noboru Kikuchi;Scott J. Hollister

  • Craniofacial Tissue Engineering by Stem Cells

    J.J. Mao;W.V. Giannobile;J.A. Helms;S.J. Hollister

  • Scaffold design and manufacturing: from concept to clinic.

    Scott J. Hollister

  • A homogenization sampling procedure for calculating trabecular bone effective stiffness and tissue level stress

    Scott J. Hollister;J. M. Brennan;Noboru Kikuchi

  • Framework for optimal design of porous scaffold microstructure by computational simulation of bone regeneration

    Taiji Adachi;Yuki Osako;Mototsugu Tanaka;Masaki Hojo

  • Engineering craniofacial scaffolds

    Scott J. Hollister;C. Y. Lin;E. Saito;R. D. Schek

  • Homogenization theory and digital imaging: A basis for studying the mechanics and design principles of bone tissue.

    Scott J. Hollister;Noboru Kikuchi

  • The pore size of polycaprolactone scaffolds has limited influence on bone regeneration in an in vivo model

    Sara M. Mantila Roosa;Jessica M. Kemppainen;Erin N. Moffitt;Paul H. Krebsbach

  • Hydroxyapatite implants with designed internal architecture.

    Tien-Min Gabriel Chu;John W. Halloran;Scott J. Hollister;Stephen E. Feinberg

  • 3D-printed Bioresorbable Scaffold for Periodontal Repair

    G. Rasperini;S.P. Pilipchuk;C.L. Flanagan;C.H. Park

  • An image-based approach for designing and manufacturing craniofacial scaffolds

    Scott J. Hollister;Richard A. Levy;Tien Min Chu;John W. Halloran

  • Regulatory Considerations in the Design and Manufacturing of Implantable 3D-Printed Medical Devices.

    Robert J. Morrison;Khaled N. Kashlan;Colleen L. Flanangan;Jeanne K. Wright

  • Engineered osteochondral grafts using biphasic composite solid free-form fabricated scaffolds.

    Rachel M. Schek;Juan M. Taboas;Sharon J. Segvich;Scott J. Hollister

  • Trabecular bone remodeling: an experimental model.

    Steven A. Goldstein;Larry S. Matthews;Janet L. Kuhn;Scott J. Hollister

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul H. Krebsbach
Paul H. Krebsbach University of California, Los Angeles
John W. Halloran
John W. Halloran University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
William L. Murphy
William L. Murphy University of Wisconsin–Madison
Steven A. Goldstein
Steven A. Goldstein University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Ralph Müller
Ralph Müller ETH Zurich
William V. Giannobile
William V. Giannobile Harvard University
Noboru Kikuchi
Noboru Kikuchi University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
J. Brian Fowlkes
J. Brian Fowlkes University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jeffrey A. Weiss
Jeffrey A. Weiss University of Utah
Philippe K. Zysset
Philippe K. Zysset University of Bern

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Scott J. Hollister

Trending Scientists