World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Alan I. Abramowitz

Alan I. Abramowitz

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
50
Citations
12152
World Ranking
239
National Ranking
140

Alan I. Abramowitz publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan I. Abramowitz sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 126 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Alan I. Abramowitz D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan I. Abramowitz sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alan I. Abramowitz is affiliated with Emory University in the United States. Their primary field of study is Social Sciences, with a focus on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Gender Studies, and Communication. Their research contributions reflect a multidisciplinary approach to political and social phenomena.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Forgiveness and Related Behaviors
  • Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Gender Politics and Representation
  • Populism, Right-Wing Movements
  • Social Media and Politics

Alan I. Abramowitz has authored several academic papers. Notable recent publications include:

  • "It's the Pandemic, Stupid! A Simplified Model for Forecasting the 2020 Presidential Election" (2020) published in PS Political Science & Politics
  • "The Polarized American Electorate: The Rise of Partisan-Ideological Consistency and Its Consequences" (2022) published in Political Science Quarterly
  • "It's Only You and Me and We Just Disagree: The Ideological Foundations of Affective Polarization" (2021) published in The Forum
  • "Trump on the Trail: Assessing the Impact of Presidential Campaign Visits on Voting Behavior in the 2018 Midterm Elections" (2020) published in Presidential Studies Quarterly

In addition to these, Abramowitz is associated with research on intellectual humility and affective polarization coauthored by Shauna M. Bowes, published in the Journal of Research in Personality (2020).

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Abramowitz include:

  • Shauna M. Bowes
  • Madeline C. Blanchard
  • Thomas H. Costello
  • Scott O. Lilienfeld
  • Costas Panagopoulos

Their work has been published repeatedly in venues such as:

  • Harvard Dataverse
  • Journal of Research in Personality
  • PS Political Science & Politics
  • Political Science Quarterly
  • The Forum

The subjects investigated by Abramowitz frequently concern electoral dynamics, partisan polarization, voting behavior, and the psychological underpinnings of political attitudes and divisions.

Best Publications

  • Is Polarization a Myth

    Alan I. Abramowitz;Kyle L. Saunders

  • The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy

    Alan I. Abramowitz

  • The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of U.S. elections in the 21st century

    Alan I. Abramowitz;Steven Webster

  • Ideological Realignment in the U.S. Electorate

    Alan I. Abramowitz;Kyle L. Saunders

  • Explaining Senate Election Outcomes

    Alan I. Abramowitz

  • Negative Partisanship: Why Americans Dislike Parties But Behave Like Rabid Partisans

    Alan I. Abramowitz;Steven W. Webster

  • Exploring the Bases of Partisanship in the American Electorate: Social Identity vs. Ideology

    Alan I. Abramowitz;Kyle L. Saunders

  • Incumbency, Campaign Spending, and the Decline of Competition in U.S. House Elections

    Alan I. Abramowitz

  • It's Abortion, Stupid: Policy Voting in the 1992 Presidential Election

    Alan I. Abramowitz

  • The Ideological Foundations of Affective Polarization in the U.S. Electorate

    Steven W. Webster;Alan I. Abramowitz

  • Why Can't We All Just Get Along? The Reality of a Polarized America

    Alan Abramowitz;Kyle Saunders

  • Incumbency, Redistricting, and the Decline of Competition in U.S. House Elections

    Alan I. Abramowitz;Brad Alexander;Matthew Gunning

  • United States: Racial Resentment, Negative Partisanship, and Polarization in Trump’s America:

    Alan Abramowitz;Jennifer McCoy

  • Viability, Electability, and Candidate Choice in a Presidential Primary Election: A Test of Competing Models

    Alan I. Abramowitz

  • An Improved Model for Predicting Presidential Election Outcomes

    Alan I. Abramowitz

  • Issue Evolution Reconsidered: Racial Attitudes and Partisanship in the U.S. Electorate

    Alan I. Abramowitz

  • The Great Alignment: Race, Party Transformation, and the Rise of Donald Trump

    Alan I. Abramowitz

  • The Impact of a Presidential Debate on Voter Rationality

    Alan I. Abramowitz

  • Economic Conditions, Causal Attributions, and Political Evaluations in the 1984 Presidential Election

    Alan I. Abramowitz;David J. Lanoue;Subha Ramesh

  • Name Familiarity, Reputation, and the Incumbency Effect in a Congressional Election

    Alan I. Abramowitz

  • Economic Conditions, Presidential Popularity, and Voting Behavior in Midterm Congressional Elections

    Alan I. Abramowitz

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald B. Rapoport
Ronald B. Rapoport William & Mary
Walter J. Stone
Walter J. Stone University of California, Davis
James E. Campbell
James E. Campbell University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Helmut Norpoth
Helmut Norpoth Stony Brook University
Jeffrey A. Segal
Jeffrey A. Segal Stony Brook University
Christopher Wlezien
Christopher Wlezien The University of Texas at Austin
Robert S. Erikson
Robert S. Erikson Columbia University
Michael S. Lewis-Beck
Michael S. Lewis-Beck University of Iowa
Scott O. Lilienfeld
Scott O. Lilienfeld Emory University
Richard G. Niemi
Richard G. Niemi University of Rochester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Political Science opens the door to a variety of career options, many of which intersect with other dynamic fields. For instance, students with their eyes on public policy may find overlapping interests with top paying jobs for environmental science majors, especially in areas like environmental policy or legislative advocacy.

The analytical skills gained in Political Science are also highly relevant to quantitative fields. Those aiming to enhance their data analysis abilities can explore online degree mathematics programs to gain complementary expertise in statistics or modeling, both valuable in policy research.

Public administration and research librarianship are popular pathways too. Pursuing library science online classes can help political science graduates support information management in educational and governmental settings.

Finally, a background in political science pairs well with history. Learning how to get a history degree online can further deepen your understanding of political trends and historical events, enhancing both teaching and research opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Alan I. Abramowitz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles