World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
25
Citations
7448
World Ranking
1565
National Ranking
778

Geoffrey C. Layman publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geoffrey C. Layman sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 79 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Geoffrey C. Layman D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geoffrey C. Layman sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 25 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

Geoffrey C. Layman is a researcher affiliated with the University of Notre Dame in the United States. Their scholarly work primarily focuses on the intersection of religion and politics within American society.

The research topics explored by Layman include:

  • Religion and Society Interactions
  • American Constitutional Law and Politics
  • Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Religion, Society, and Development
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Populism, Right-Wing Movements
  • Political Philosophy and Ethics

Layman's publications span several fields, with the main focus on Social Sciences, supported by subfields including Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Communication, Philosophy, and Health.

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Layman include:

  • "Secularism and American Political Behavior" (2021), published in Public Opinion Quarterly
  • "Political Parties and Loser's Consent in American Politics" (2023), published in The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

In addition to articles, Layman authored a book titled Secular Surge, published in 2020 by Cambridge University Press.

Frequent publication venues for Layman's work include:

  • Harvard Dataverse
  • Political Psychology
  • The Forum
  • Public Opinion Quarterly
  • The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

Layman has collaborated extensively with several co-authors, such as:

  • David E. Campbell
  • John C. Green
  • Levi G. Allen
  • James R. G. Kirk
  • Wayde Z.C. Marsh

Best Publications

  • Party Polarization and "Conflict Extension" in the American Electorate

    Geoffrey C. Layman;Thomas Michael Carsey

  • The great divide : religious and cultural conflict in American party politics

    Geoffrey C. Layman

  • PARTY POLARIZATION IN AMERICAN POLITICS: Characteristics, Causes, and Consequences

    Geoffrey C. Layman;Thomas M. Carsey;Juliana Menasce Horowitz

  • Changing Sides or Changing Minds? Party Identification and Policy Preferences in the American Electorate

    Thomas M. Carsey;Geoffrey C. Layman

  • Religion and Political Behavior in the United States: The Impact of Beliefs, Affiliations, and Commitment from 1980 to 1994

    Geoffrey C. Layman

  • Activists and Conflict Extension in American Party Politics

    Geoffrey C. Layman;Thomas M. Carsey;John C. Green;Richard Herrera

  • “Bands of Others”? Attitudes toward Muslims in Contemporary American Society

    Kerem Ozan Kalkan;Geoffrey C. Layman;Eric M. Uslaner

  • Cultural Conflict in American Politics: Religious Traditionalism, Postmaterialism, and U.S. Political Behavior

    Geoffrey C. Layman;Edward G. Carmines

  • Wars and Rumours of Wars: The Contexts of Cultural Conflict in American Political Behaviour

    Geoffrey C. Layman;John C. Green

  • The Party Faithful: Partisan Images, Candidate Religion, and the Electoral Impact of Party Identification

    David E. Campbell;John C. Green;Geoffrey C. Layman

  • Party Polarization and Party Structuring of Policy Attitudes: A Comparison of Three NES Panel Studies

    Geoffrey C. Layman;Thomas M. Carsey

  • “Culture Wars” in the American Party System Religious and Cultural Change among Partisan Activists Since 1972

    Geoffrey C. Layman

  • Beyond Race: Social Justice as a Race Neutral Ideal

    Paul M. Sniderman;Edward G. Carmines;Geoffrey C. Layman;Michael Carter

  • Value Priorities, Partisanship and Electoral Choice: The Neglected Case of the United States

    Edward G. Carmines;Geoffrey C. Layman

  • Authoritarianism and American Political Behavior from 1952 to 2008

    Anne M. Cizmar;Geoffrey C. Layman;John McTague;Shanna Pearson-Merkowitz

  • Religious Group Cues and Citizen Policy Attitudes in the United States

    Todd Adkins;Geoffrey C. Layman;David E. Campbell;John C. Green

  • Putting Politics First: The Impact of Politics on American Religious and Secular Orientations

    David E. Campbell;Geoffrey C. Layman;John C. Green;Nathanael G. Sumaktoyo

  • Why Do Party Activists Convert? An Analysis of Individual-Level Change on the Abortion Issue:

    Geoffrey C. Layman;Thomas M. Carsey

  • Survey Experiments on Candidate Religiosity, Political Attitudes, and Vote Choice

    Jeremiah J. Castle;Geoffrey C. Layman;David E. Campbell;John C. Green

  • PARTY POLARIZATION IN AMERICAN POLITICS

    Geoffrey C. Layman;Thomas M. Carsey;Juliana Menasce Horowitz

  • Policy Balancing and Preferences for Party Control of Government

    Thomas M. Carsey;Geoffrey C. Layman

  • State Party Context and Norms among Delegates to the 2000 National Party Conventions

    Thomas M. Carsey;John C. Green;Richard Herrera;Geoffrey C. Layman

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas M. Carsey
Thomas M. Carsey University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
John C. Green
John C. Green University of Akron
Edward G. Carmines
Edward G. Carmines Indiana University
David E. Campbell
David E. Campbell University of Notre Dame
Paul M. Sniderman
Paul M. Sniderman Stanford University
Eric M. Uslaner
Eric M. Uslaner University of Maryland, College Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Political Science often opens doors to a wide range of other online degree programs and career options. Students searching for affordable education can find the cheapest per credit hour online college options, making it easier to balance education with financial responsibilities.

Political Science graduates frequently pair their studies with specialized fields such as environmental policy. Individuals interested in sustainable development, climate policy, or resource management may consider pathways that lead to high paying jobs for environmental studies majors.

Analytical thinking gained in Political Science also complements quantitative skills. Some students pursue a bachelor in mathematics online to enhance their abilities in data analysis, research, or public policy analytics. Additionally, those interested in public information or research roles can explore the best library science programs to prepare for careers in archives, libraries, or information management.

Best Scientists Citing Geoffrey C. Layman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles