World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
25
Citations
5639
World Ranking
1573
National Ranking
784

Thomas M. Carsey publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas M. Carsey sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 77 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Thomas M. Carsey D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas M. Carsey sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 25 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas M. Carsey was affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States. Throughout their academic career, they contributed to the field of political science, with a focus on empirical research methodologies and quantitative analysis.

The data does not include specific information on recent papers, co-authors, or publication venues associated with Thomas M. Carsey. Similarly, there are no listed book publications, awards, or detailed subfields and main topics directly linked to their work available from the source.

Although detailed information about their research output or specific academic contributions is not provided, Thomas M. Carsey's association with a prominent research institution such as the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill indicates involvement in the academic community focused on political science and related disciplines.

Given the lack of specific publications or named research topics, it can be noted that their academic profile remains primarily identified through their institutional affiliation rather than extensive public bibliographic records.

Best Publications

  • Party Polarization and "Conflict Extension" in the American Electorate

    Geoffrey C. Layman;Thomas Michael Carsey

  • PARTY POLARIZATION IN AMERICAN POLITICS: Characteristics, Causes, and Consequences

    Geoffrey C. Layman;Thomas M. Carsey;Juliana Menasce Horowitz

  • Changing Sides or Changing Minds? Party Identification and Policy Preferences in the American Electorate

    Thomas M. Carsey;Geoffrey C. Layman

  • Activists and Conflict Extension in American Party Politics

    Geoffrey C. Layman;Thomas M. Carsey;John C. Green;Richard Herrera

  • State and national factors in gubernatorial and senatorial elections

    Thomas M. Carsey;Gerald C. Wright

  • The Contextual Effects of Race on White Voter Behavior: The 1989 New York City Mayoral Election

    Thomas M. Carsey

  • Party Polarization and Party Structuring of Policy Attitudes: A Comparison of Three NES Panel Studies

    Geoffrey C. Layman;Thomas M. Carsey

  • Campaign Dynamics: The Race for Governor

    Thomas M. Carsey

  • Monte Carlo Simulation and Resampling Methods for Social Science

    Thomas M. Carsey;Jeffrey J. Harden

  • Party and Committee in Distributive Politics: Evidence from Defense Spending

    Thomas M. Carsey;Barry Rundquist

  • Congress and Defense Spending: The Distributive Politics of Military Procurement

    Barry Rundquist;Thomas M. Carsey

  • US Senate campaigns, negative advertising, and voter mobilization in the 1998 midterm election

    Robert A. Jackson;Thomas Michael Carsey

  • New Measures of Partisanship, Ideology, and Policy Mood in the American States

    Thomas M. Carsey;Jeffrey J. Harden

  • Why Do Party Activists Convert? An Analysis of Individual-Level Change on the Abortion Issue:

    Geoffrey C. Layman;Thomas M. Carsey

  • Evidence of Conflict Extension in Partisans’ Evaluations of People and Inanimate Objects

    Kevin K. Banda;Thomas M. Carsey;Serge Severenchuk

  • The Reciprocal Relationship Between State Defense Interest and Committee Representation in Congress

    Thomas M. Carsey;Barry S. Rundquist

  • PARTY POLARIZATION IN AMERICAN POLITICS

    Geoffrey C. Layman;Thomas M. Carsey;Juliana Menasce Horowitz

  • Strategic Candidates, Campaign Dynamics, and Campaign Advertising in Gubernatorial Races

    Thomas Michael Carsey;Robert A. Jackson;Melissa Stewart;James P. Nelson

  • Policy Balancing and Preferences for Party Control of Government

    Thomas M. Carsey;Geoffrey C. Layman

  • Balancing constituency representation and party responsiveness in the US Senate: the conditioning effect of state ideological heterogeneity

    Jeffrey J. Harden;Thomas Michael Carsey

  • A Dynamic Model of Political Change Among Party Activists

    Thomas M. Carsey;Geoffrey C. Layman

  • State and National Factors in Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections: A Rejoinder

    Thomas M. Carsey;Gerald C. Wright

  • Making DA-RT a reality

    Thomas M. Carsey

  • Dealing with data: governments records.

    Hye Chung Kum;Stanley Ahalt;Thomas Michael Carsey

  • Presidential Voting Across the American States

    Robert A. Jackson;Thomas M. Carsey

  • State Party Context and Norms among Delegates to the 2000 National Party Conventions

    Thomas M. Carsey;John C. Green;Richard Herrera;Geoffrey C. Layman

Frequent Co-Authors

Geoffrey C. Layman
Geoffrey C. Layman University of Notre Dame
Jeffrey J. Harden
Jeffrey J. Harden University of Notre Dame
William D. Berry
William D. Berry Florida State University
Gary D. Slade
Gary D. Slade University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
John C. Green
John C. Green University of Akron
Gerald C. Wright
Gerald C. Wright Indiana University
Richard G. Niemi
Richard G. Niemi University of Rochester
James M. Snyder
James M. Snyder Harvard University
Peter J. Mucha
Peter J. Mucha Dartmouth College
Gary King
Gary King Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Political Science opens the door to an array of affordable online degree programs that can help you launch or advance your career. Many students pair Political Science with a master's in history programs to strengthen their understanding of global events and policymaking.

If you're looking for flexibility or to enter the workforce quickly, consider enrolling in one of the shortest masters degree offerings or pursuing online certifications that pay well. These options allow you to specialize and gain job-ready skills without spending years in school or creating financial burdens.

Whether your goal is to become a public administrator, policy analyst, or work in education, there are a range of streamlined and budget-friendly online programs to support your ambitions. Explore your options and choose the pathway that best fits your professional goals and learning style.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas M. Carsey

Recently Published Articles