World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Political Science 30 1200 1086 601 523 115 3403

James E. Campbell publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James E. Campbell between 1951 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James E. Campbell published across 70 years, from 1951 to 2020, averaging 1.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2018. 3 of the 136 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1951 to 2020. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2018. 1951: 1 publication 1952: 0 publications 1953: 0 publications 1954: 0 publications 1955: 0 publications 1956: 1 publication 1957: 0 publications 1958: 0 publications 1959: 1 publication 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 1 publication 1967: 2 publications 1968: 2 publications 1969: 1 publication 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 3 publications 1986: 6 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 4 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 11 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 1 publication
1951 2020

136 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James E. Campbell: publications per year, 1951 to 2020
Year Publications
1951 1
1952 0
1953 0
1954 0
1955 0
1956 1
1957 0
1958 0
1959 1
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 1
1967 2
1968 2
1969 1
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 2
1980 0
1981 0
1982 2
1983 4
1984 1
1985 3
1986 6
1987 4
1988 0
1989 0
1990 2
1991 2
1992 4
1993 1
1994 0
1995 1
1996 4
1997 2
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 7
2002 1
2003 3
2004 6
2005 4
2006 3
2007 3
2008 10
2009 3
2010 6
2011 6
2012 4
2013 5
2014 3
2015 2
2016 8
2017 1
2018 11
2019 2
2020 1
Total 136
Download as CSV

James E. Campbell publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James E. Campbell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 333+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 97. Most scientists, 97, have 333+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–115 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36–40 publications 333+

This scientist: 115 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 10
41–45 11
46–50 25
51–55 27
56–60 44
61–65 52
66–70 62
71–75 62
76–80 79
81–85 71
86–90 82
91–95 65
96–100 85
101–105 76
106–110 66
111–115 78 115
116–120 67
121–125 73
126–130 73
131–135 64
136–140 45
141–145 53
146–150 44
151–155 45
156–160 33
161–165 32
166–170 28
171–175 31
176–180 29
181–185 27
186–190 36
191–195 27
196–200 24
201–205 16
206–210 16
211–215 19
216–220 16
221–225 17
226–230 18
231–235 23
236–240 17
241–245 13
246–250 17
251–255 9
256–260 13
261–265 8
266–270 12
271–275 8
276–280 10
281–285 13
286–290 13
291–295 5
296–300 6
301–305 11
306–310 9
311–315 6
316–320 4
321–325 4
326–330 2
331–332 5
333+ 97
Download as CSV

James E. Campbell D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James E. Campbell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 43 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 62+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 62+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 30 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 76
21 79
22 84
23 68
24 88
25 82
26 76
27 75
28 99
29 96
30 96 30
31 81
32 86
33 81
34 84
35 72
36 58
37 53
38 48
39 40
40 40
41 32
42 26
43 25
44 33
45 33
46 17
47 21
48 22
49 18
50 19
51 19
52 15
53 14
54 10
55 13
56 9
57 11
58 12
59 10
60 5
61 7
62+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

James E. Campbell is affiliated with the University at Buffalo, State University of New York in the United States. Their academic career involves contributions to political science and related fields as evidenced by publications and research activities.

Campbell has published research in the journal Party Politics. A notable paper includes:

  • Book review: Identity Crisis: The 2016 Presidential Campaign and the Battle for the Meaning of America, 2020, published in Party Politics

While the record shows no frequent co-authors, the consistent choice of publication venue includes:

  • Party Politics

This consistency suggests engagement with topics and discourse relevant to political parties and election studies.

Academic contributions focus particularly on political communications and electoral processes, as reflected in their paper reviewing the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign's impact and narrative framing.

Best Publications

  • Forecasting the Presidential Vote in the States

    James E. Campbell

  • Cosponsoring Legislation in the U. S. Congress

    James E. Campbell

  • The Revised Theory of Surge and Decline

    James E. Campbell

  • Presidential Coattails in Senate Elections

    James E. Campbell;Joe A. Sumners

  • The Presidential Surge and its Midterm Decline in Congressional Elections, 1868-1988

    James E. Campbell

  • Presidential Coattails and Midterm Losses in State Legislative Elections

    James E. Campbell

  • Explaining Presidential Losses in Midterm Congressional Elections

    James E. Campbell

  • The presidential pulse of congressional elections

    James E. Campbell

  • Trial-Heat Forecasts of the Presidential Vote

    James E. Campbell;Kenneth A. Wink

  • The Presidential Pulse and the 1994 Midterm Congressional Election

    James E. Campbell

  • Polls and Votes: The Trial-Heat Presidential Election Forecasting Model, Certainty, and Political Campaigns

    James E. Campbell

  • Television Markets and Congressional Elections

    James E. Campbell;John R. Alford;Keith Henry

  • Ambiguity in the Issue Positions of Presidential Candidates: A Causal Analysis

    James E. Campbell

  • Predicting Seat Gains from Presidential Coattails

    James E. Campbell

  • The Convention Bump

    James E. Campbell;Lynna L. Cherry;Kenneth A. Wink

  • Why Bush Won the Presidential Election of 2004: Incumbency, Ideology, Terrorism, and Turnout

    James E. Campbell

  • The Referendum That Didn't Happen: The Forecasts of the 2000 Presidential Election

    James E. Campbell

  • Party Systems and Realignments in the United States, 1868-2004

    James E. Campbell

  • The Theory of Conditional Retrospective Voting: Does the Presidential Record Matter Less in Open-Seat Elections?

    James E. Campbell;Bryan J. Dettrey;Hongxing Yin

  • The Trial-Heat Forecast of the 2008 Presidential Vote: Performance and Value Considerations in an Open-Seat Election

    James E. Campbell

  • Forecasting the 2012 American National Elections

    James E. Campbell

  • US presidential election forecasting: An introduction

    James E. Campbell;Michael S. Lewis-Beck

  • The Presidential Surge and its Midterm Decline in Congressional Elections, 1868-1988

    Unknown

  • Issue Voting An Empirical Examination of Individually Necessary and Jointly Sufficient Conditions

    Kenneth J. Meier;James E. Campbell

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael S. Lewis-Beck
Michael S. Lewis-Beck University of Iowa
Kenneth J. Meier
Kenneth J. Meier American University
Thomas E. Mann
Thomas E. Mann Brookings Institution
Alan I. Abramowitz
Alan I. Abramowitz Emory University
Christopher Wlezien
Christopher Wlezien The University of Texas at Austin
Robert S. Erikson
Robert S. Erikson Columbia University
William Mishler
William Mishler University of Arizona
Gregory B. Lewis
Gregory B. Lewis Georgia State University
Helmut Norpoth
Helmut Norpoth Stony Brook University
James N. Druckman
James N. Druckman University of Rochester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Political Science in the USA can open up a diverse range of career opportunities. Many students also explore related fields to broaden their expertise and increase their employability. For instance, those interested in environmental policy often consider what can you do with an environmental science degree to address pressing global challenges.

Analytical and research-heavy careers may benefit from combining Political Science with the best online math degrees, enhancing data analysis and quantitative skills essential in policy work and governmental roles.

For those interested in information management, pursuing a library science degree online can lead to positions in archival research, public information services, and academic institutions. Additionally, many Political Science graduates also look into degrees in history to deepen their understanding of societal developments and public policy.

Exploring these online degrees can help students align their academic journey with their desired career pathway, making them more versatile in a competitive job market.

Best Scientists Citing James E. Campbell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles