World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
30
Citations
3403
World Ranking
1200
National Ranking
601

James E. Campbell publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James E. Campbell sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 115 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

James E. Campbell D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James E. Campbell sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

James E. Campbell is affiliated with the University at Buffalo, State University of New York in the United States. Their academic career involves contributions to political science and related fields as evidenced by publications and research activities.

Campbell has published research in the journal Party Politics. A notable paper includes:

  • Book review: Identity Crisis: The 2016 Presidential Campaign and the Battle for the Meaning of America, 2020, published in Party Politics

While the record shows no frequent co-authors, the consistent choice of publication venue includes:

  • Party Politics

This consistency suggests engagement with topics and discourse relevant to political parties and election studies.

Academic contributions focus particularly on political communications and electoral processes, as reflected in their paper reviewing the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign's impact and narrative framing.

Best Publications

  • Forecasting the Presidential Vote in the States

    James E. Campbell

  • Cosponsoring Legislation in the U. S. Congress

    James E. Campbell

  • The Revised Theory of Surge and Decline

    James E. Campbell

  • Presidential Coattails in Senate Elections

    James E. Campbell;Joe A. Sumners

  • The Presidential Surge and its Midterm Decline in Congressional Elections, 1868-1988

    James E. Campbell

  • Presidential Coattails and Midterm Losses in State Legislative Elections

    James E. Campbell

  • Explaining Presidential Losses in Midterm Congressional Elections

    James E. Campbell

  • The presidential pulse of congressional elections

    James E. Campbell

  • Trial-Heat Forecasts of the Presidential Vote

    James E. Campbell;Kenneth A. Wink

  • The Presidential Pulse and the 1994 Midterm Congressional Election

    James E. Campbell

  • Polls and Votes: The Trial-Heat Presidential Election Forecasting Model, Certainty, and Political Campaigns

    James E. Campbell

  • Television Markets and Congressional Elections

    James E. Campbell;John R. Alford;Keith Henry

  • Ambiguity in the Issue Positions of Presidential Candidates: A Causal Analysis

    James E. Campbell

  • Predicting Seat Gains from Presidential Coattails

    James E. Campbell

  • The Convention Bump

    James E. Campbell;Lynna L. Cherry;Kenneth A. Wink

  • Why Bush Won the Presidential Election of 2004: Incumbency, Ideology, Terrorism, and Turnout

    James E. Campbell

  • The Referendum That Didn't Happen: The Forecasts of the 2000 Presidential Election

    James E. Campbell

  • Party Systems and Realignments in the United States, 1868-2004

    James E. Campbell

  • The Theory of Conditional Retrospective Voting: Does the Presidential Record Matter Less in Open-Seat Elections?

    James E. Campbell;Bryan J. Dettrey;Hongxing Yin

  • The Trial-Heat Forecast of the 2008 Presidential Vote: Performance and Value Considerations in an Open-Seat Election

    James E. Campbell

  • Forecasting the 2012 American National Elections

    James E. Campbell

  • US presidential election forecasting: An introduction

    James E. Campbell;Michael S. Lewis-Beck

  • The Presidential Surge and its Midterm Decline in Congressional Elections, 1868-1988

    Unknown

  • Issue Voting An Empirical Examination of Individually Necessary and Jointly Sufficient Conditions

    Kenneth J. Meier;James E. Campbell

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael S. Lewis-Beck
Michael S. Lewis-Beck University of Iowa
Kenneth J. Meier
Kenneth J. Meier American University
Thomas E. Mann
Thomas E. Mann Brookings Institution
Alan I. Abramowitz
Alan I. Abramowitz Emory University
Christopher Wlezien
Christopher Wlezien The University of Texas at Austin
Robert S. Erikson
Robert S. Erikson Columbia University
William Mishler
William Mishler University of Arizona
Gregory B. Lewis
Gregory B. Lewis Georgia State University
Helmut Norpoth
Helmut Norpoth Stony Brook University
James N. Druckman
James N. Druckman University of Rochester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Political Science in the USA can open up a diverse range of career opportunities. Many students also explore related fields to broaden their expertise and increase their employability. For instance, those interested in environmental policy often consider what can you do with an environmental science degree to address pressing global challenges.

Analytical and research-heavy careers may benefit from combining Political Science with the best online math degrees, enhancing data analysis and quantitative skills essential in policy work and governmental roles.

For those interested in information management, pursuing a library science degree online can lead to positions in archival research, public information services, and academic institutions. Additionally, many Political Science graduates also look into degrees in history to deepen their understanding of societal developments and public policy.

Exploring these online degrees can help students align their academic journey with their desired career pathway, making them more versatile in a competitive job market.

Best Scientists Citing James E. Campbell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles