World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
26
Citations
3868
World Ranking
1520
National Ranking
759

Thomas M. Holbrook publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas M. Holbrook sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 73 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Thomas M. Holbrook D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas M. Holbrook sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 26 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas M. Holbrook is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee in the United States. Their research primarily spans the social sciences, with specific focus areas in political science and international relations, gender studies, communication, strategy and management, and economics and econometrics.

The scientist has contributed to several topics within these fields, including:

  • Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
  • Taxation and Compliance Studies
  • Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Corruption and Economic Development
  • Gender Politics and Representation

Recent peer-reviewed publications by Thomas M. Holbrook include:

  • "Straight to the (Revenue) Source: Contextual and Individual-Level Determinants of Attitudes Toward Local Taxes," 2021, published in American Politics Research
  • "Objective conditions, political knowledge, and perceptions of electoral competition in U.S. mayoral elections," 2023, published in Social Science Quarterly
  • "Perceptions of Local Political Corruption," 2024, published in Political Research Quarterly

Their work has appeared in respected journals such as Social Science Quarterly, American Politics Research, and Political Research Quarterly.

Thomas M. Holbrook has collaborated frequently with co-authors including:

  • Amanda J. Heideman
  • Aaron C. Weinschenk

The research contributions reflect a broad engagement with subjects related to political participation, governance, and social factors influencing politics and policy.

Best Publications

  • ELECTORAL COMPETITION IN THE AMERICAN STATES

    Thomas M. Holbrook;Emily Van Dunk

  • Do Campaigns Matter

    Thomas M. Holbrook

  • Electoral Competition, Legislative Balance, and American State Welfare Policy

    Charles Barrilleaux;Thomas Holbrook;Laura Langer

  • “I Seen My Opportunities and I Took 'Em:” Political Corruption in the American States

    Kenneth J. Meier;Thomas M. Holbrook

  • The Mobilization of Core Supporters: Campaigns, Turnout, and Electoral Composition in United States Presidential Elections

    Thomas M. Holbrook;Scott D. McClurg

  • Political Learning from Presidential Debates

    Thomas M. Holbrook

  • Presidential Campaigns and the Knowledge Gap

    Thomas M. Holbrook

  • Homo Economus? Economic Information and Economic Voting

    Thomas Holbrook;James C. Garand

  • Presidential Elections in Space and Time

    Thomas M. Holbrook

  • Campaigns, Mobilization, and Turnout in Mayoral Elections:

    Thomas M. Holbrook;Aaron C. Weinschenk

  • Sophomore Surge in State Legislative Elections, 1968-86

    Thomas M. Holbrook;Charles M. Tidmarch

  • Knowing Versus Caring: The Role of Affect and Cognition in Political Perceptions

    Kathleen A. Dolan;Thomas M. Holbrook

  • Campaigns, National Conditions, and U.S. Presidential Elections

    Thomas M. Holbrook

  • Did the Whistle-Stop Campaign Matter?

    Thomas M. Holbrook

  • Incumbency, National Conditions, and the 2008 Presidential Election

    Thomas M. Holbrook

  • Reading the Political Tea Leaves A Forecasting Model of Contemporary Presidential Elections

    Thomas M. Holbrook

  • Incumbency, National Conditions, and the 2012 Presidential Election

    Thomas M. Holbrook

  • Cognitive Style and Political Learning in the 2000 U.S. Presidential Campaign

    Thomas M. Holbrook

  • Using state polls to forecast presidential election outcomes in the American states

    Thomas M Holbrook;Jay A DeSart

  • Forecasting with Mixed Economic Signals: A Cautionary Tale

    Thomas M. Holbrook

  • The Behavioral Consequences of Vice-Presidential Debates: Does the Undercard Have Any Punch?

    Thomas M. Holbrook

  • Money, candidates, and mayoral elections

    Thomas M. Holbrook;Aaron C. Weinschenk

  • A Recap of the 2016 Election Forecasts

    James E. Campbell;Helmut Norpoth;Alan I. Abramowitz;Michael S. Lewis-Beck

Frequent Co-Authors

Scott D. McClurg
Scott D. McClurg Southern Illinois University Carbondale
Jeffrey A. Karp
Jeffrey A. Karp Brunel University London
Kenneth J. Meier
Kenneth J. Meier American University
Robert S. Erikson
Robert S. Erikson Columbia University
Christopher Wlezien
Christopher Wlezien The University of Texas at Austin
Alan I. Abramowitz
Alan I. Abramowitz Emory University
Michael S. Lewis-Beck
Michael S. Lewis-Beck University of Iowa
Helmut Norpoth
Helmut Norpoth Stony Brook University
James E. Campbell
James E. Campbell University at Buffalo, State University of New York
James C. Garand
James C. Garand Louisiana State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your knowledge in Political Science can open doors to many complementary disciplines and flexible career options. If you’re looking to fast-track your graduate education, several quick masters degrees online are available, helping you deepen expertise and boost your credentials in under two years.

For students who want to maximize value, it’s essential to consider affordable online colleges. These programs provide a way to balance high-quality education with lower tuition costs—making your long-term career goals more attainable.

Political Science often intersects with other growing fields. For example, you can explore roles and industries detailed in what can you do with an environmental science degree if you’re interested in policy-making for environmental protection or climate change.

A solid grounding in data and analysis is also valuable. Many professionals combine political knowledge with technical skills gained from programs like an online bachelor's in mathematics, leading to analytical roles in government, organizations, or research.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas M. Holbrook

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles