World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ronald B. Rapoport

Ronald B. Rapoport

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
25
Citations
2028
World Ranking
1637
National Ranking
819

Ronald B. Rapoport publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald B. Rapoport sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 49 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Ronald B. Rapoport D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald B. Rapoport sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 25 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ronald B. Rapoport is affiliated with William & Mary in the United States. Their work spans multiple fields within the social sciences, with a focus on political science and related interdisciplinary areas. Over recent years, Rapoport has contributed to research on electoral systems, political participation, and the intersections of politics with academic freedom and social psychology.

The main fields of study for Rapoport include Social Sciences, with subfields in Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Education, and Public Administration. The scholar's research topics encompass several areas:

  • Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences
  • Higher Education Research Studies
  • Academic Freedom and Politics
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social and Cultural Dynamics
  • Migration, Refugees, and Integration

Rapoport's recent publications reflect these varied research interests. These include:

  • Learning through Peer Reviewing and Publishing in the Pi Sigma Alpha Undergraduate Journal of Politics: Twenty Years Later (2021), published in PS Political Science & Politics
  • It's Trump's Party and I'll Cry if I Want To (2020), published in The Forum
  • Incorporating Immigrants into Canadian Politics: An Experiment on the Effects of Attentiveness to Elections in the Country of Origin (2024), published in Canadian Journal of Political Science

The venues where Rapoport frequently publishes include PS Political Science & Politics, The Forum, and Canadian Journal of Political Science. These journals are recognized platforms in the field of political science and interdisciplinary social sciences research.

Collaboration features in Rapoport's work, with frequent coauthors including Christina Walker, Terri L. Towner, Rosalee A. Clawson, Zoe M. Oxley, and Christine L. Nemacheck. Each of these coauthors has contributed to projects alongside Rapoport, reflecting a collaborative research approach.

Best Publications

  • The More Things Change the More They Stay the Same: Examining Gender Differences in Political Attitude Expression, 1952–2000

    Lonna Rae Atkeson;Ronald B. Rapoport

  • Sex Differences in Attitude Expression: A Generational Explanation

    Ronald B. Rapoport

  • The Sex Gap in Political Persuading: Where the "Structuring Principle" Works*

    Ronald B. Rapoport

  • Talking Politics on Facebook: Network Centrality and Political Discussion Practices in Social Media

    Patrick R. Miller;Piotr S. Bobkowski;Daniel Maliniak;Ronald B. Rapoport

  • Three's A Crowd: The Dynamic of Third Parties, Ross Perot, and Republican Resurgence

    Ronald B. Rapoport;Walter J. Stone

  • Candidate Traits and Voter Inferences: An Experimental Study

    Ronald B. Rapoport;Kelly L. Metcalf;Jon A. Hartman

  • Turning On or Turning Off? Mobilization and Demobilization Effects of Participation in Presidential Nomination Campaigns

    Walter J. Stone;Lonna Rae Atkeson;Ronald B. Rapoport

  • Like Mother, Like Daughter: Intergenerational Transmission of DK Response Rates

    Ronald B. Rapoport

  • Candidate Support in Presidential Nomination Campaigns: The Case of Iowa in 1984

    Walter J. Stone;Ronald B. Rapoport;Alan I. Abramowitz

  • Do Endorsements Matter? Group Influence in the 1984 Democratic Caucuses

    Ronald B. Rapoport;Walter J. Stone;Alan I. Abramowitz

  • Social Structure, Social Context, and Partisan Mobilization: Urban Workers in Chile

    Kenneth P. Langton;Ronald Rapoport

  • A Note on Strategic Voting in a Primary Election

    Alan Abramowitz;John McGlennon;Ronald Rapoport

  • Child body mass index, obesity, and proximity to fast food restaurants.

    Jennifer M. Mellor;Carrie B. Dolan;Ronald B. Rapoport

  • A Simulation Model of Presidential Nomination Choice

    Walter J. Stone;Ronald B. Rapoport;Lonna Rae Atkeson

  • Vice-Presidential Candidates and the Home State Advantage: Playing Second Banana at Home and on the Road

    Robert L. Dudley;Ronald B. Rapoport

  • A Paradox of Voting: Cyclical Majorities and the Case of Muscle Shoals

    John L. Neufeld;William J. Hausman;Ronald B. Rapoport

  • Sex and the Caucus Participant: The Gender Gap and Presidential Nominations

    Ronald B. Rapoport;Walter J. Stone;Alan I. Abramowitz

  • From Respondents to Networks: Bridging Between Individuals, Discussants, and the Network in the Study of Political Discussion

    Matthew T. Pietryka;Jack Lyons Reilly;Daniel M. Maliniak;Patrick R. Miller

  • A model for disaggregating political change

    Ronald B. Rapoport;Walter J. Stone

  • Candidate Perception among Nomination Activists: A New Look at the Moderation Hypothesis

    Walter J. Stone;Ronald B. Rapoport

  • Partisanship Change in a Candidate-Centered Era

    Ronald B. Rapoport

  • It's Perot Stupid! The Legacy of the 1992 Perot Movement in the Major-Party System, 1994–2000

    Walter J. Stone;Ronald B. Rapoport

  • Heeding the Call: An Assessment of Mobilization into H. Ross Perot's 1992 Presidential Campaign

    James A. McCann;Ronald B. Rapoport;Walter J. Stone

  • Presidential Nomination Campaigns and Party Mobilization: An Assessment of Spillover Effects

    James A. McCann;Randall W. Partin;Ronald B. Rapoport;Walter J. Stone

Frequent Co-Authors

Walter J. Stone
Walter J. Stone University of California, Davis
Alan I. Abramowitz
Alan I. Abramowitz Emory University
Lonna Rae Atkeson
Lonna Rae Atkeson Florida State University
Robert Huckfeldt
Robert Huckfeldt University of California, Davis
Michael X. Delli Carpini
Michael X. Delli Carpini University of Pennsylvania
John R. Petrocik
John R. Petrocik University of Missouri

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Political Science often opens doors to a wide range of interdisciplinary fields. Students interested in policy analysis or quantitative research may consider an online degree mathematics program, which can enhance data analysis and critical thinking skills essential in government or research roles.

For those attracted to information management, a library science degree online can provide foundational knowledge in organizing legal or legislative documents—useful for careers in public policy or academia.

A degree in history is another popular complement, offering perspective on political systems and institutions over time, and preparing graduates for roles in research, education, or heritage organizations.

Those seeking flexibility in their studies may pursue a cheap online interdisciplinary studies degree. This option allows for customization across social sciences, empowering students to tailor their program to match diverse career goals within the political sphere.

Best Scientists Citing Ronald B. Rapoport

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles