World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Political Science 32 1018 919 167 155 143 4397

Hilde Coffé publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Hilde Coffé between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Hilde Coffé published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 6.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2020. 7 of the 152 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2020. 2001: 3 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 3 publications
2001 2025

152 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Hilde Coffé: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 3
2002 6
2003 3
2004 6
2005 10
2006 8
2007 6
2008 7
2009 6
2010 6
2011 7
2012 7
2013 7
2014 6
2015 4
2016 4
2017 6
2018 6
2019 5
2020 12
2021 6
2022 5
2023 9
2024 4
2025 3
Total 152
Download as CSV

Hilde Coffé publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hilde Coffé sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 333+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 97. Most scientists, 97, have 333+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–145 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36–40 publications 333+

This scientist: 143 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 10
41–45 11
46–50 25
51–55 27
56–60 44
61–65 52
66–70 62
71–75 62
76–80 79
81–85 71
86–90 82
91–95 65
96–100 85
101–105 76
106–110 66
111–115 78
116–120 67
121–125 73
126–130 73
131–135 64
136–140 45
141–145 53 143
146–150 44
151–155 45
156–160 33
161–165 32
166–170 28
171–175 31
176–180 29
181–185 27
186–190 36
191–195 27
196–200 24
201–205 16
206–210 16
211–215 19
216–220 16
221–225 17
226–230 18
231–235 23
236–240 17
241–245 13
246–250 17
251–255 9
256–260 13
261–265 8
266–270 12
271–275 8
276–280 10
281–285 13
286–290 13
291–295 5
296–300 6
301–305 11
306–310 9
311–315 6
316–320 4
321–325 4
326–330 2
331–332 5
333+ 97
Download as CSV

Hilde Coffé D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hilde Coffé sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 43 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 62+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 62+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 76
21 79
22 84
23 68
24 88
25 82
26 76
27 75
28 99
29 96
30 96
31 81
32 86 32
33 81
34 84
35 72
36 58
37 53
38 48
39 40
40 40
41 32
42 26
43 25
44 33
45 33
46 17
47 21
48 22
49 18
50 19
51 19
52 15
53 14
54 10
55 13
56 9
57 11
58 12
59 10
60 5
61 7
62+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Hilde Coffé is affiliated with the University of Bath in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the social sciences, with a strong focus on political science and international relations, gender studies, sociology, communication, and strategy and management.

The main topics addressed in Coffé's work include:

  • Gender Politics and Representation
  • Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Populism, Right-Wing Movements
  • Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Social Policy and Reform Studies
  • Climate Change Communication and Perception

Frequent publication venues featuring Coffé's research are:

  • European Journal of Politics and Gender
  • Frontiers in Political Science
  • Journal of Women Politics & Policy
  • Parliamentary Affairs
  • British Politics

Notable recent papers authored or coauthored by Coffé include:

  • "How candidate characteristics matter: Candidate profiles, political sophistication, and vote choice," 2020, Politics
  • "Masculinity, sexism and populist radical right support," 2023, Frontiers in Political Science
  • "Are all politics masculine? Gender socialised personality traits and diversity in political engagement," 2020, European Journal of Politics and Gender

Additional papers connected to their research collaboration are:

  • "When Do Männerparteien Elect Women? Radical Right Populist Parties and Strategic Descriptive Representation," 2022, American Political Science Review
  • "Climate Belief and Issue Salience: Comparing Two Dimensions of Public Opinion on Climate Change in the EU," 2021, Social Indicators Research

Coffé has collaborated regularly with several researchers, including:

  • Robin Devroe
  • Audrey Vandeleene
  • Bram Wauters
  • Ana Catalano Weeks
  • Bonnie M. Meguid

Best Publications

  • Same Game, Different Rules? Gender Differences in Political Participation

    Hilde Coffé;Catherine Bolzendahl

  • Toward an Empirical Characterization of Bridging and Bonding Social Capital

    Hilde Coffé;Benny Geys

  • Fertile grounds for extreme right-wing parties: Explaining the Vlaams Blok's electoral success

    Hilde Coffé;Bruno Heyndels;Jan Vermeir

  • Institutional performance and social capital. An application to the local government level.

    Hilde Coffé;Benny Geys

  • How Friendship Network Characteristics Influence Subjective Well-Being

    Mariska van der Horst;Hilde Coffé

  • Community Heterogeneity: A Burden for the Creation of Social Capital?†

    Hilde Coffé;Benny Geys

  • Explaining the gender gap in radical right voting: A cross-national investigation in 12 Western European countries

    Tim Immerzeel;Hilde Coffé;Tanja van der Lippe

  • Education and support for representative, direct and stealth democracy

    Hilde Coffé;Ank Michels

  • Are ‘Good’ Citizens ‘Good’ Participants? Testing Citizenship Norms and Political Participation across 25 Nations:

    Catherine Bolzendahl;Hilde Coffé

  • Gender Gaps in Political Participation Across Sub-Saharan African Nations

    Hilde Coffe;Catherine Bolzendahl

  • Women Stay Local, Men Go National and Global? Gender Differences in Political Interest

    Hilde Coffé

  • Do Individual Factors Explain the Different Success of the Two Belgian Extreme Right Parties

    Hilde Coffé

  • Participation in Bridging and Bonding Associations and Civic Attitudes: Evidence from Flanders

    Hilde Coffé;Benny Geys

  • Citizenship Norms in Eastern Europe

    Hilde Coffé;Tanja van der Lippe

  • When Do Männerparteien Elect Women? Radical Right Populist Parties and Strategic Descriptive Representation

    Unknown

  • Young people, parents and radical right voting. The Case of the Swiss People’s Party

    Hilde Coffé;Marieke Voorpostel

  • Social Capital and Community Heterogeneity

    Hilde R. Coffé

  • Transitions in Partnership and Parental Status, Gender, and Political and Civic Participation

    Marieke Voorpostel;Hilde Coffé

  • The adaptation of the extreme right's discourse, The case of the Vlaams Blok

    Hilde Coffe

  • Citizenship and Involvement in European Democracies. A Comparative Analysis . Edited by van W. van Deth, José Ramón Montero, and Anders Westholm. (Routledge, 2007.)

    Hilde Coffé

  • Competing with the radical right Distances between the European radical right and other parties on typical radical right issues

    Tim Immerzeel;Marcel Lubbers;Hilde Coffé

  • Citizens’ media use and the accuracy of their perceptions of electoral integrity:

    Hilde Coffé

  • Gender, gendered personality traits and radical right populist voting:

    Hilde Coffé

  • Towards an empirical characterization of bridging and bonding social capital [Zur empirischen Charakterisierung von heterogenen (bridging) und homogenen (bonding) Arten des Sozialkapitals]

    Hilde Coffé;Benny Geys

Frequent Co-Authors

Benny Geys
Benny Geys BI Norwegian Business School
Tanja van der Lippe
Tanja van der Lippe Utrecht University
Marcel Lubbers
Marcel Lubbers Utrecht University
Jeroen Dewulf
Jeroen Dewulf Ghent University
Rosie Campbell
Rosie Campbell King's College London
Susan Banducci
Susan Banducci University of Exeter
Ignacio Lago
Ignacio Lago Pompeu Fabra University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Political Science in the USA opens the door to a diverse set of online degree options and interdisciplinary career paths. Many students complement their core studies with subjects like mathematics for strong analytical and research skills. Consider an online bachelor degree mathematics program to strengthen quantitative reasoning, which is valuable in policy analysis and data-driven decision making.

Library science is another field closely aligned with political research and information management. Taking library science online classes can lead to careers in archives, knowledge management, and public administration.

A background in history is commonly paired with political science, offering insights into social change, governance, and diplomatic relations. Discover your opportunities with what can you do with a history degree for career ideas in education, research, and government.

For maximum flexibility, explore the best online interdisciplinary studies degree programs. These allow you to tailor your learning to fit multiple interests—preparing you for varied roles in law, public policy, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Hilde Coffé

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles