World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Lila J. Finney Rutten

Lila J. Finney Rutten

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 56 1902 1719 906 807 196 11643

Lila J. Finney Rutten publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lila J. Finney Rutten between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lila J. Finney Rutten published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 11.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2021. 27 of the 261 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2021. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 5 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 23 publications 2021: 26 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 25 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 13 publications
2003 2025

261 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lila J. Finney Rutten: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 1
2005 5
2006 5
2007 3
2008 7
2009 4
2010 15
2011 7
2012 5
2013 4
2014 9
2015 15
2016 19
2017 15
2018 13
2019 11
2020 23
2021 26
2022 21
2023 25
2024 14
2025 13
Total 261
Download as CSV

Lila J. Finney Rutten publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lila J. Finney Rutten sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 194–203 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 196 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304 196
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Lila J. Finney Rutten D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lila J. Finney Rutten sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109 56
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Lila J. Finney Rutten is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States and has a focused research portfolio within the field of medicine, contributing extensively to oncology, epidemiology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, pathology and forensic medicine, and health.

Their research addresses several main topics, including colorectal cancer screening and detection, global cancer incidence and screening, gastric cancer management and outcomes, genetic factors in colorectal cancer, cervical cancer and HPV research, vaccine coverage and hesitancy, and chronic disease management strategies.

Among their recent publications are several significant papers, such as "Evidence-Based Strategies for Clinical Organizations to Address COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy" (2020) published in Mayo Clinic Proceedings, "Association of Neighborhood Measures of Social Determinants of Health With Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the US Midwest" (2020) in JAMA Network Open, "Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with multimorbidity in a geographically-defined community" (2020) in BMC Public Health, "Health Literacy and Outcomes Among Patients With Heart Failure" (2020) in JACC Heart Failure, and "How health care providers should address vaccine hesitancy in the clinical setting: Evidence for presumptive language in making a strong recommendation" (2020) in Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics.

Rutten frequently collaborates with other researchers such as Xuan Zhu, Joan M. Griffin, Jennifer L. St. Sauver, Paul J. Limburg, and Debra J. Jacobson.

Their work is published predominantly in venues that include Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Preventive Medicine Reports, Journal of Clinical Oncology, The American Journal of Gastroenterology, and Current Medical Research and Opinion.

  • Mayo Clinic Proceedings
  • Preventive Medicine Reports
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • The American Journal of Gastroenterology
  • Current Medical Research and Opinion

  • Xuan Zhu
  • Joan M. Griffin
  • Jennifer L. St. Sauver
  • Paul J. Limburg
  • Debra J. Jacobson

  • Evidence-Based Strategies for Clinical Organizations to Address COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy (2020) - Mayo Clinic Proceedings
  • Association of Neighborhood Measures of Social Determinants of Health With Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the US Midwest (2020) - JAMA Network Open
  • Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with multimorbidity in a geographically-defined community (2020) - BMC Public Health
  • Health Literacy and Outcomes Among Patients With Heart Failure (2020) - JACC Heart Failure
  • How health care providers should address vaccine hesitancy in the clinical setting: Evidence for presumptive language in making a strong recommendation (2020) - Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics

  • Oncology
  • Epidemiology
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Health

  • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
  • Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Chronic Disease Management Strategies

Best Publications

  • Information needs and sources of information among cancer patients: a systematic review of research (1980–2003)

    Lila J. Finney Rutten;Neeraj K. Arora;Alexis D. Bakos;Noreen Aziz

  • Perceived helpfulness and impact of social support provided by family, friends, and health care providers to women newly diagnosed with breast cancer.

    Neeraj K. Arora;Lila J. Finney Rutten;David H. Gustafson;Richard Moser

  • Online Health Information Seeking Among US Adults: Measuring Progress Toward a Healthy People 2020 Objective.

    Lila J. Finney Rutten;Kelly D. Blake;Alexandra J. Greenberg-Worisek;Summer V. Allen

  • Cancer-Related Information Seeking: Hints from the 2003 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS)

    Lila J Finney Rutten;Linda Squiers;Bradford Hesse

  • Risk of developing multimorbidity across all ages in an historical cohort study: differences by sex and ethnicity.

    Jennifer L St Sauver;Cynthia M Boyd;Brandon R Grossardt;William V Bobo

  • Prevalence of Multimorbidity in a Geographically Defined American Population: Patterns by Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity

    Walter A. Rocca;Cynthia M. Boyd;Brandon R. Grossardt;William V. Bobo

  • Evidence-Based Strategies for Clinical Organizations to Address COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy

    Lila J. Finney Rutten;Xuan Zhu;Aaron L. Leppin;Jennifer L. Ridgeway

  • Surveys of physicians and electronic health information.

    Bradford W. Hesse;Richard P. Moser;Lila J. Rutten

  • Association of Neighborhood Measures of Social Determinants of Health With Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the US Midwest.

    Shaheen S. Kurani;Rozalina G. McCoy;Michelle A. Lampman;Chyke A. Doubeni

  • Multimorbidity in Heart Failure: A Community Perspective

    Alanna M. Chamberlain;Jennifer L. St. Sauver;Yariv Gerber;Yariv Gerber;Sheila M. Manemann

  • Use of E-Cigarettes Among Current Smokers: Associations Among Reasons for Use, Quit Intentions, and Current Tobacco Use

    Lila J. Finney Rutten;Kelly D. Blake;Amenah A. Agunwamba;Rachel A. Grana

  • Use of the Internet to Communicate with Health Care Providers in the United States: Estimates from the 2003 and 2005 Health Information National Trends Surveys (HINTS)

    Ellen Burke Beckjord;Lila J. Finney Rutten;Linda Squiers;Neeraj K Arora

  • Data Resource Profile: Expansion of the Rochester Epidemiology Project medical records-linkage system (E-REP).

    Walter A Rocca;Brandon R Grossardt;Scott M Brue;Cynthia M Bock-Goodner

  • Cancer-Related Information Seeking Among Cancer Survivors: Trends Over a Decade (2003–2013)

    Lila J. Finney Rutten;Amenah A. Agunwamba;Patrick Wilson;Neetu Chawla

  • Cancer patients' information needs across the cancer care continuum: evidence from the cancer information service.

    Linda Squiers;Lila J. Finney Rutten;Katherine Treiman;Mary Anne Bright

  • The health information national trends survey: research from the baseline.

    Bradford W Hesse;Richard P Moser;Lila J Finney Rutten;Gary L Kreps

  • Examination of population-wide trends in barriers to cancer screening from a diffusion of innovation perspective (1987-2000).

    Lila J Finney Rutten;David E Nelson;Helen I Meissner

  • Data Resource Profile: The National Cancer Institute’s Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS)

    Lila J Finney Rutten;Kelly D Blake;Victoria G Skolnick;Terisa Davis

  • Health Information-Seeking on Behalf of Others: Characteristics of “Surrogate Seekers”

    Sarah L. Cutrona;Kathleen M. Mazor;Sana N. Vieux;Tana M. Luger

  • Picking up the pace: changes in method and frame for the health information national trends survey (2011-2014).

    Lila J. Finney Rutten;Terisa Davis;Ellen Burke Beckjord;Kelly Blake

  • Vaccine Hesitancy.

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Bradford W. Hesse
Bradford W. Hesse National Institutes of Health
Walter A. Rocca
Walter A. Rocca Mayo Clinic
Helen Sullivan
Helen Sullivan Australian National University
William V. Bobo
William V. Bobo Mayo Clinic
Barbara P. Yawn
Barbara P. Yawn University of Minnesota
Kathleen M. Mazor
Kathleen M. Mazor University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Mary Story
Mary Story Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Social Sciences and Humanities opens up a wide range of professional opportunities in counseling, therapy, psychology, and social work. With the growing demand for flexibility, many students now prefer online degree options to balance their studies with work or family commitments.

If you are interested in counseling, consider exploring cacrep accredited online counseling programs. These programs not only provide comprehensive coursework in mental health but also meet licensure requirements in many states. For those passionate about supporting families, an online master's degree in marriage and family therapy can set the foundation for a fulfilling career as a licensed therapist.

Psychology students may benefit from finding the cheapest online degree in psychology to minimize debt while opening doors to many career paths in human behavior and mental health. If social work is your passion, there are numerous options among online msw programs that emphasize accessibility while preparing graduates for critical roles in communities.

Choosing one of these online degrees can help you launch a meaningful career in the social sciences, often with greater affordability, flexibility, and accessibility.

Best Scientists Citing Lila J. Finney Rutten

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles