World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
51
Citations
9308
World Ranking
3662
National Ranking
1282

Mary Alice Coffroth publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary Alice Coffroth sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 98 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Mary Alice Coffroth D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary Alice Coffroth sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mary Alice Coffroth is affiliated with the University at Buffalo, State University of New York in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on environmental science and earth and planetary sciences, with a specialized concentration in coral and marine ecosystems studies.

The main fields of study associated with their work include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences

Their research covers several subfields within these areas, such as:

  • Ecology
  • Oceanography
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Key topics addressed in their publications include:

  • Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
  • Marine and Coastal Plant Biology
  • Coastal Wetland Ecosystem Dynamics
  • Marine and Fisheries Research
  • Marine Biology and Ecology Research
  • Marine Ecology and Invasive Species
  • Parasite Biology and Host Interactions

Their recent papers reflect active contribution to the scientific community, with titles and publication years as follows:

  • Increasing comparability among coral bleaching experiments, 2020, Ecological Applications
  • Building consensus around the assessment and interpretation of Symbiodiniaceae diversity, 2023, PeerJ
  • Thermally tolerant symbionts may explain Caribbean octocoral resilience to heat stress, 2021, Coral Reefs
  • Building Consensus around the Assessment and Interpretation of Symbiodiniaceae Diversity, 2022, Preprints.org
  • Nutrient dynamics in coral symbiosis depend on both the relative and absolute abundance of Symbiodiniaceae species, 2022, Microbiome

Mary Alice Coffroth frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • Coral Reefs
  • Ecology and Evolution
  • Ecological Applications
  • PeerJ
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

The scientist has worked alongside various co-authors, including:

  • Casey P. terHorst
  • Christian R. Voolstra
  • Virginia M. Weis
  • Shelby E. McIlroy
  • Mark E. Warner

Best Publications

  • Draft Assembly of the Symbiodinium minutum Nuclear Genome Reveals Dinoflagellate Gene Structure

    Eiichi Shoguchi;Chuya Shinzato;Takeshi Kawashima;Fuki Gyoja

  • Differential gene expression during thermal stress and bleaching in the Caribbean coral Montastraea faveolata.

    M. K. Desalvo;C. R. Voolstra;S. Sunagawa;J. A. Schwarz

  • Genetic diversity of symbiotic dinoflagellates in the genus Symbiodinium.

    Mary Alice Coffroth;Scott R. Santos

  • Connectivity and resilience of coral reef metapopulations in marine protected areas: matching empirical efforts to predictive needs.

    L. W. Botsford;J. W. White;M. A. Coffroth;C. B. Paris

  • Molecular phylogeny of symbiotic dinoflagellates inferred from partial chloroplast large subunit (23S)-rDNA sequences.

    Scott R Santos;Derek J Taylor;Robert A Kinzie;Michio Hidaka

  • SYMBIODINIUM (PYRRHOPHYTA) GENOME SIZES (DNA CONTENT) ARE SMALLEST AMONG DINOFLAGELLATES

    Todd C. LaJeunesse;Georgina Lambert;Robert A. Andersen;Mary Alice Coffroth

  • Symbiodinium transcriptomes: genome insights into the dinoflagellate symbionts of reef-building corals.

    Till Bayer;Manuel Aranda;Shinichi Sunagawa;Lauren K. Yum

  • The Adaptive Bleaching Hypothesis: Experimental Tests of Critical Assumptions

    Robert A. Kinzie;Michelle Takayama;Scott R. Santos;Mary Alice Coffroth

  • DNA fingerprints of a gorgonian coral: a method for detecting clonal structure in a vegetative species

    Mary Alice Coffroth;Howard R. Lasker;Margaret E. Diamond;Jeremy A. Bruenn

  • DNA BARCODING: Barcoding corals: limited by interspecific divergence, not intraspecific variation

    T. L. Shearer;M. A. Coffroth

  • GENETIC COMPARISONS OF FRESHLY ISOLATED VERSUS CULTURED SYMBIOTIC DINOFLAGELLATES: IMPLICATIONS FOR EXTRAPOLATING TO THE INTACT SYMBIOSIS

    Scott R. Santos;Derek J. Taylor;Mary Alice Coffroth

  • Early ontogenetic expression of specificity in a cnidarian-algal symbiosis

    Mary Alice Coffroth;Scott R. Santos;Tamar L. Goulet

  • The Acquisition of Exogenous Algal Symbionts by an Octocoral After Bleaching

    Cynthia L. Lewis;Mary Alice Coffroth

  • Coral life history and symbiosis: Functional genomic resources for two reef building Caribbean corals, Acropora palmata and Montastraea faveolata

    Jodi A Schwarz;Peter B Brokstein;Christian Voolstra;Astrid Y Terry

  • The host transcriptome remains unaltered during the establishment of coral-algal symbioses

    Christian R. Voolstra;Jodi A. Schwarz;Julia Schnetzer;Shinichi Sunagawa

  • Environmental populations of symbiotic dinoflagellates in the genus Symbiodinium can initiate symbioses with reef cnidarians

    Mary Alice Coffroth;Cynthia F. Lewis;Scott R. Santos;Jessica L. Weaver

  • Bleaching of reef coelenterates in the San Blas Islands, Panama

    Howard R. Lasker;Esther C. Peters;Mary Alice Coffroth

  • Fine‐scale diversity and specificity in the most prevalent lineage of symbiotic dinoflagellates (Symbiodinium, Dinophyceae) of the Caribbean

    S. R. Santos;T. L. Shearer;A. R. Hannes;M. A. Coffroth

  • Molecular genetic evidence that dinoflagellates belonging to the genus Symbiodinium freudenthal are haploid.

    Scott R. Santos;Mary Alice Coffroth

  • Environmental barcoding reveals massive dinoflagellate diversity in marine environments.

    Rowena F. Stern;Ales Horak;Rose L. Andrew;Mary Alice Coffroth

Frequent Co-Authors

Scott R. Santos
Scott R. Santos University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Howard R. Lasker
Howard R. Lasker University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Mónica Medina
Mónica Medina Pennsylvania State University
Christian R. Voolstra
Christian R. Voolstra University of Konstanz
Alina M. Szmant
Alina M. Szmant University of North Carolina Wilmington
Shinichi Sunagawa
Shinichi Sunagawa Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
Kazuhiko Sakai
Kazuhiko Sakai University of the Ryukyus
Derek J. Taylor
Derek J. Taylor University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Andrew C. Baker
Andrew C. Baker University of Miami
Eldredge Bermingham
Eldredge Bermingham Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution opens doors to diverse career paths, many of which now integrate science with healthcare, public policy, or technology. Online degrees make it easier than ever to blend these interests. For example, health-focused programs like online direct entry msn options are available for those seeking a rapid transition into nursing fields, regardless of prior background.

If you are already a registered nurse, comparing programs such as capella rn to bsn vs chamberlain rn to bsn will help you find the best fit to advance your credentials online. There are also rn to msn bridge programs that offer an affordable and flexible path for career advancement—important for those who want to combine ecological or evolutionary knowledge with healthcare delivery.

Today, many of the best online science and healthcare programs are hosted at non profit online university institutions, offering accreditation, network support, and broad career pathways. Choosing the right online degree can enable you to apply ecology and evolution expertise in a range of dynamic, growth-oriented professions.

Best Scientists Citing Mary Alice Coffroth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles