World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Glynda J. Kinsella

Glynda J. Kinsella

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
45
Citations
8749
World Ranking
6660
National Ranking
391

Glynda J. Kinsella publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Glynda J. Kinsella sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 147 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Glynda J. Kinsella D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Glynda J. Kinsella sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Glynda J. Kinsella is affiliated with La Trobe University in Australia. Their research spans multiple fields with a primary focus on Medicine and Psychology, particularly within Psychiatry and Mental Health, Epidemiology, Emergency Medicine, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Neurology.

The scientist's main research topics include:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Health, psychology, and well-being

Kinsella's recent published papers cover various aspects of cognitive decline, brain injury, and neuropsychological interventions:

  • "Subjective Cognitive Decline: Level of Risk for Future Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment, a Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Studies," 2021, Neuropsychology Review
  • "Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Outcome after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Older People," 2021, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
  • "Clinical and Blood Biomarker Trajectories after Concussion: New Insights from a Longitudinal Pilot Study of Professional Flat-Track Jockeys," 2022, Journal of Neurotrauma
  • "Delivery of Neuropsychological Interventions for Adult and Older Adult Clinical Populations: An Australian Expert Working Group Clinical Guidance Paper," 2023, Neuropsychology Review
  • "Cognitive performance in older people after mild traumatic brain injury: Trauma effects and other risk factors," 2022, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Frequent publication venues for Kinsella include:

  • Neuropsychology Review
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
  • Journal of Neurotrauma
  • Brain Injury
  • Physiology & Behavior

The scientist has collaborated with several researchers over multiple publications, including:

  • Bradley J. Wright
  • Biswadev Mitra
  • Camilla H. Hume
  • Kerryn E. Pike
  • Marina Cavuoto

Kinsella's research addresses key issues in cognitive impairment and brain injury, combining clinical and epidemiological perspectives. The combination of meta-analyses, longitudinal studies, and clinical guidance papers illustrates a broad approach to understanding and mitigating the effects of cognitive decline and brain trauma across adult populations.

Best Publications

  • Attentional deficits following closed head injury

    Jennie Ponsford;Glynda Kinsella

  • The relationship between executive function abilities, adaptive behaviour, and academic achievement in children with externalising behaviour problems.

    Cheryl Clark;Margot Prior;Margot Prior;Glynda Kinsella

  • Early intervention for mild cognitive impairment: a randomised controlled trial

    Glynda J Kinsella;Elizabeth Mullaly;Elizabeth Rand;Ben Ong

  • Remedial therapy after stroke: a randomised controlled trial.

    D S Smith;E Goldenberg;A Ashburn;G Kinsella

  • Do executive function deficits differentiate between adolescents with ADHD and oppositional defiant/conduct disorder? A neuropsychological study using the Six Elements Test and Hayling Sentence Completion Test.

    Cheryl Clark;Margot Prior;Glynda J. Kinsella

  • Effect of age on forward and backward span tasks.

    Robert L. Hester;Glynda J. Kinsella;Ben Ong

  • The cerebellum and neuropsychological functioning: a critical review.

    Christopher J O'Halloran;Glynda J Kinsella;Elsdon Storey

  • Impact of traumatic brain injury on the family: A critical review.

    Amaryll Perlesz;Glynda Kinsella;Simon Crowe

  • Psychological distress and family satisfaction following traumatic brain injury: injured individuals and their primary, secondary, and tertiary carers.

    Amaryll Perlesz;Glynda Kinsella;Simon Crowe

  • Subjective Cognitive Decline: Level of Risk for Future Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment, a Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Studies

    Kerryn E Pike;Marina G Cavuoto;Lily Li;Bradley J Wright

  • Evaluation of a remedial programme for attentional deficits following closed-head injury.

    Jennie L. Ponsford;Glynda Kinsella

  • The use of a rating scale of attentional behaviour

    Jennie Ponsford;Glynda Kinsella

  • Predictors and indicators of academic outcome in children 2 years following traumatic brain injury.

    Glynda J. Kinsella;Margot Prior;Michael Sawyer;Ben Ong

  • Repeatability and validity of a modified activities of daily living (ADL) index in studies of chronic disability.

    K Sheikh;D S Smith;T W Meade;E Goldenberg

  • The role of the family for behavioral outcome in children and adolescents following traumatic brain injury.

    Glynda Kinsella;Ben Ong;Douglas Murtagh;Margot Prior

  • A review of the measurement of caregiver and family burden in palliative care.

    Glynda Kinsella;Brian Cooper;Cliff Picton;Douglas Murtagh

  • Social interaction following severe closed head injury

    L. Elsass;G. Kinsella

  • Estimating WAIS-R IQ from the national adult reading test: A cross-validation

    David Willshire;Glynda Kinsella;Margot Prior

  • Everyday memory following traumatic brain injury

    G Kinsella;D Murtagh;A Landry;K Homfray

  • Psychosocial readjustment in the spouses of aphasic patients. A comparative Survey of 79 subjects.

    Kinsella Gj;Duffy Fd

  • Acute recovery from patterns in stroke patients: neuropsychological factors.

    Glynda Kinsella;Bruce Ford

Frequent Co-Authors

Linda Clare
Linda Clare University of Exeter
Margot Prior
Margot Prior University of Melbourne
David Ames
David Ames University of Melbourne
Michael M. Saling
Michael M. Saling University of Melbourne
Jennie Ponsford
Jennie Ponsford Monash University
Michael G. Sawyer
Michael G. Sawyer University of Adelaide
James Danckert
James Danckert University of Waterloo
Paul Maruff
Paul Maruff University of Melbourne
Robert Hester
Robert Hester University of Melbourne
Vicki Anderson
Vicki Anderson Murdoch Children's Research Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens the door to a variety of rewarding online degrees and career pathways, especially in fields like marriage and family therapy (MFT). Online psychology programs can provide the foundational knowledge needed for advanced, specialized roles, including counseling and therapy.

The process of how to become a marriage and family therapist in Long Beach often begins with a bachelor’s in psychology, followed by a master’s degree in marriage and family therapy or a related field. It’s important to understand the mft requirements in Los Angeles and other cities, as licensing standards and supervised clinical experience can vary by location.

Interested students should also explore differences in pathways, such as how to become a marriage and family therapist in Louisville compared to other cities like Lubbock. Each city may require different coursework, practicum hours, and certification exams. To better understand these regional nuances, review the specific Lubbock mft education requirements.

Ultimately, choosing the right online degree program and understanding state and city-specific requirements are key steps to a successful psychology career in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Glynda J. Kinsella

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles