World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
110
Citations
66065
World Ranking
5428
National Ranking
204

Hein Putter publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hein Putter sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 807 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Hein Putter D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hein Putter sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 110 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hein Putter is affiliated with Leiden University Medical Center in the Netherlands and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a focus on surgery, oncology, and statistical methods applied to medical research. Their work spans a wide range of subfields including pulmonary and respiratory medicine, epidemiology, and cancer treatments.

Their research covers several main topics, such as statistical methods and inference, colorectal cancer surgical treatments, and advanced causal inference techniques. They have a notable emphasis on colorectal and anal carcinomas and endometrial and cervical cancer treatments. Additionally, they explore health systems, economic evaluations, and quality of life considerations in medical contexts.

Hein Putter's publication record includes a variety of recent papers that have appeared in respected journals. Some of these notable publications include:

  • Short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy before total mesorectal excision (TME) versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy, TME, and optional adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (RAPIDO): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial (2020, The Lancet Oncology)
  • Molecular Classification of the PORTEC-3 Trial for High-Risk Endometrial Cancer: Impact on Prognosis and Benefit From Adjuvant Therapy (2020, Journal of Clinical Oncology)
  • Fasting mimicking diet as an adjunct to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer in the multicentre randomized phase 2 DIRECT trial (2020, Nature Communications)
  • Locoregional Failure During and After Short-course Radiotherapy Followed by Chemotherapy and Surgery Compared With Long-course Chemoradiotherapy and Surgery (2023, Annals of Surgery)
  • A tutorial on frailty models (2020, Statistical Methods in Medical Research)

Their collaborations include frequent co-authorship with scholars such as Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg, Carien L. Creutzberg, Cornelis J.H. van de Velde, Remi A. Nout, and Rob A.E.M. Tollenaar. The number of joint publications with these individuals reflects sustained research partnerships over time.

Regarding the channels of dissemination, Hein Putter has been published regularly in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Radiotherapy and Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Statistics in Medicine, and Statistical Methods in Medical Research. These platforms suggest a blend of open-access and peer-reviewed journal contributions, with an interdisciplinary reach covering clinical oncology and statistical methodology.

Best Publications

  • Preoperative Radiotherapy Combined with Total Mesorectal Excision for Resectable Rectal Cancer

    Ellen Kapiteijn;Corrie A.M. Marijnen;Iris D. Nagtegaal;Hein Putter

  • Persistent epigenetic differences associated with prenatal exposure to famine in humans

    Bastiaan T. Heijmans;Elmar W. Tobi;Aryeh D. Stein;Hein Putter

  • Tutorial in biostatistics: competing risks and multi-state models.

    H. Putter;M. Fiocco;R. B. Geskus

  • Surgical treatment of gastric cancer: 15-year follow-up results of the randomised nationwide Dutch D1D2 trial

    Ilfet Songun;Hein Putter;Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg;Mitsuru Sasako

  • Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer: 12-year follow-up of the multicentre, randomised controlled TME trial

    Willem van Gijn;Carrie A. M. Marijnen;Iris D. Nagtegaal;Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg

  • The TME Trial After a Median Follow-Up of 6 Years: Increased Local Control but No Survival Benefit in Irradiated Patients With Resectable Rectal Carcinoma

    Koen C. M. J. Peeters;Corrie A. M. Marijnen;Iris D. Nagtegaal;Elma Klein Kranenbarg

  • Vaginal brachytherapy versus pelvic external beam radiotherapy for patients with endometrial cancer of high-intermediate risk (PORTEC-2): an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised trial

    RA Nout;Vthbm Smit;H Putter;IM Jürgenliemk-Schulz

  • DNA methylation differences after exposure to prenatal famine are common and timing- and sex-specific

    Elmar W. Tobi;L.H. Lumey;L.H. Lumey;Rudolf P. Talens;Dennis Kremer

  • Extended Lymph Node Dissection for Gastric Cancer: Who May Benefit? Final Results of the Randomized Dutch Gastric Cancer Group Trial

    H.H. Hartgrink;C.J.H. van de Velde;H. Putter;J.J. Bonenkamp

  • Short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy before total mesorectal excision (TME) versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy, TME, and optional adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (RAPIDO): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.

    Renu R Bahadoer;Esmée A Dijkstra;Boudewijn van Etten;Corrie A M Marijnen;Corrie A M Marijnen

  • Competing risks in epidemiology: possibilities and pitfalls

    Per Kragh Andersen;Ronald B Geskus;Theo de Witte;Hein Putter

  • Impact of short-term preoperative radiotherapy on health-related quality of life and sexual functioning in primary rectal cancer: Report of a multicenter randomized trial

    Corrie A.M. Marijnen;Cornelis J.H. van de Velde;Hein Putter;Mandy van den Brink

  • Improved Risk Assessment by Integrating Molecular and Clinicopathological Factors in Early-stage Endometrial Cancer—Combined Analysis of the PORTEC Cohorts

    Ellen Stelloo;Remi A. Nout;Elisabeth M. Osse;Ina J. Jürgenliemk-Schulz

  • Randomized Feeding Intervention in Infants at High Risk for Celiac Disease

    S. L. Vriezinga;R. Auricchio;E. Bravi;G. Castillejo

  • Right ventricular dysfunction and pulmonary obstruction index at helical CT: prediction of clinical outcome during 3-month follow-up in patients with acute pulmonary embolism

    Rutger W van der Meer;Peter M T Pattynama;Marco J L van Strijen;Annette A van den Berg-Huijsmans

  • DNA methylation signatures link prenatal famine exposure to growth and metabolism

    Elmar W. Tobi;Jelle J. Goeman;Ramin Monajemi;Hongcang Gu

  • The bootstrap: a tutorial

    Ron Wehrens;Hein Putter;Lutgarde M.C Buydens

  • Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): final results of an international, open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial

    Stephanie M. de Boer;Melanie E. Powell;Linda Mileshkin;Dionyssios Katsaros

  • Adjuvant chemotherapy after preoperative (chemo)radiotherapy and surgery for patients with rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data.

    Anne J Breugom;Marloes Swets;Jean-François Bosset;Laurence Collette

  • DUTCH COLORECTAL CANCER GROUP. PREOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY COMBINED WITH TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION FOR RESECTABLE RECTAL CANCER

    E Kapiteijn;C A Marijnen;I D Nagtegaal;H Putter

Frequent Co-Authors

Cornelis J.H. van de Velde
Cornelis J.H. van de Velde Leiden University Medical Center
Caroline Seynaeve
Caroline Seynaeve Erasmus University Rotterdam
Carien L. Creutzberg
Carien L. Creutzberg Leiden University Medical Center
Vincent T.H.B.M. Smit
Vincent T.H.B.M. Smit Leiden University Medical Center
Corrie A.M. Marijnen
Corrie A.M. Marijnen Leiden University Medical Center
Martin J. Schalij
Martin J. Schalij Leiden University Medical Center
Rob A. E. M. Tollenaar
Rob A. E. M. Tollenaar Leiden University Medical Center
Hans Gelderblom
Hans Gelderblom Leiden University Medical Center
John M. S. Bartlett
John M. S. Bartlett University of Toronto
J. Wouter Jukema
J. Wouter Jukema Leiden University Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternatives to traditional medical school can open diverse and rewarding career pathways in the healthcare sector. Many aspiring professionals find msn direct entry programs online especially appealing, as these allow non-nurses with a bachelor’s degree to fast-track into advanced nursing roles with flexibility and convenience.

For those looking for more accessible routes, there are nursing programs with high acceptance rates that reduce competitive barriers, allowing more students to pursue a career in nursing. Additionally, online education options are also expanding in allied health fields. For instance, medical coding and billing classes online with financial aid offer a flexible way to enter the growing healthcare administration field.

If standardized testing is a concern, students can seek out lpn program no entrance exam opportunities, which make nursing more accessible by removing testing barriers. These varied options help students align their education choices with personal goals and life situations, building strong foundations for healthcare careers.

Best Scientists Citing Hein Putter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles