World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Genetics
Germany
2024
Award Badge
Genetics and Molecular Biology
Germany
2024

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
95
Citations
32480
World Ranking
902
National Ranking
75

Ulrich M. Zanger publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrich M. Zanger sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 209 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Ulrich M. Zanger D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrich M. Zanger sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2024 - Research.com Genetics in Germany Leader Award
  • 2024 - Research.com Genetics and Molecular Biology in Germany Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Genetics in Germany Leader Award

Overview

Ulrich M. Zanger is affiliated with the Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology in Germany. Their research spans multiple fields including Medicine, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics.

The scientist's work primarily focuses on areas such as Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism, Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms, Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism, Estrogen and related hormone effects, Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact, Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography, and Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism.

Frequent coauthors in their publications include:

  • Ute Hofmann
  • Kathrin Klein
  • Matthias Schwab
  • Hannah Asperger
  • Nadia Stamm

The scientist has contributed to research published in several venues, with multiple publications in:

  • Breast Cancer Research
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Gut
  • Scientific Reports
  • Frontiers in Pharmacology

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Ulrich M. Zanger include:

  • Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Activate the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor and the Constitutive Androstane Receptor to Regulate Xenobiotic Metabolism in Human Liver Cells, 2020, International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Progesterone receptor membrane component 1 regulates lipid homeostasis and drives oncogenic signaling resulting in breast cancer progression, 2020, Breast Cancer Research
  • TGF-β2 silencing to target biliary-derived liver diseases, 2020, Gut
  • Differential effects on human cytochromes P450 by CRISPR/Cas9-induced genetic knockout of cytochrome P450 reductase and cytochrome b5 in HepaRG cells, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • Effects of Diminished NADPH:cytochrome P450 Reductase in Human Hepatocytes on Lipid and Bile Acid Homeostasis, 2021, Frontiers in Pharmacology

Best Publications

  • Cytochrome P450 enzymes in drug metabolism: Regulation of gene expression, enzyme activities, and impact of genetic variation

    Ulrich M. Zanger;Matthias Schwab;Matthias Schwab

  • Cytochrome P450 2D6: overview and update on pharmacology, genetics, biochemistry

    Ulrich M. Zanger;Sebastian Raimundo;Michel Eichelbaum

  • Characterization of the common genetic defect in humans deficient in debrisoquine metabolism.

    F J Gonzalez;R C Skoda;S Kimura;M Umeno

  • The genetic determinants of the CYP3A5 polymorphism

    Elisabeth Hustert;Michael Haberl;Oliver Burk;Renzo Wolbold

  • Molecular mechanisms of genetic polymorphisms of drug metabolism.

    Urs A. Meyer;Ulrich M. Zanger

  • Functional pharmacogenetics/genomics of human cytochromes P450 involved in drug biotransformation

    Ulrich M. Zanger;Ulrich M. Zanger;Miia Turpeinen;Miia Turpeinen;Miia Turpeinen;Kathrin Klein;Kathrin Klein;Matthias Schwab;Matthias Schwab

  • Extensive genetic polymorphism in the human CYP2B6 gene with impact on expression and function in human liver.

    Thomas Lang;Kathrin Klein;Joachim Fischer;Andreas K. Nüssler

  • Sex is a major determinant of CYP3A4 expression in human liver

    Renzo Wolbold;Kathrin Klein;Oliver Burk;Andreas K. Nüssler

  • Nomenclature for human CYP2D6 alleles.

    A K Daly;J Brockmoller;F Broly;M Eichelbaum

  • Breast cancer treatment outcome with adjuvant tamoxifen relative to patient CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotypes.

    Werner Schroth;Lydia Antoniadou;Peter Fritz;Matthias Schwab

  • Comprehensive analysis of thiopurine S-methyltransferase phenotype-genotype correlation in a large population of German-Caucasians and identification of novel TPMT variants

    Elke Schaeffeler;Christine Fischer;Dierk Brockmeier;Dorothee Wernet

  • Role of Genetic and Nongenetic Factors for Fluorouracil Treatment-Related Severe Toxicity: A Prospective Clinical Trial by the German 5-FU Toxicity Study Group

    Matthias Schwab;Ulrich M. Zanger;Claudia Marx;Elke Schaeffeler

  • Expression of organic cation transporters OCT1 (SLC22A1) and OCT3 (SLC22A3) is affected by genetic factors and cholestasis in human liver.

    Anne T. Nies;Hermann Koepsell;Stefan Winter;Stefan Winter;Oliver Burk

  • Interindividual variability and tissue-specificity in the expression of cytochrome P450 3A mRNA.

    Ina Koch;Regina Weil;Renzo Wolbold;Jürgen Brockmöller

  • Association between the C3435T MDR1 gene polymorphism and susceptibility for ulcerative colitis

    Matthias Schwab;Elke Schaeffeler;Claudia Marx;Martin F. Fromm

  • Assessment of the predictive power of genotypes for the in-vivo catalytic function of CYP2D6 in a German population

    Ernst-Ulrich Griese;Ulrich Zanger;Ulrich Brudermanns;Andrea Gaedigk

  • Clinical relevance of DPYD variants c.1679T>G, c.1236G>A/HapB3, and c.1601G>A as predictors of severe fluoropyrimidine-associated toxicity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data

    Didier Meulendijks;Linda M Henricks;Gabe S Sonke;Maarten J Deenen

  • Frequency of C3435T polymorphism of MDR1 gene in African people

    Elke Schaeffeler;Michel Eichelbaum;Michel Eichelbaum;Ulrich Brinkmann;Anja Penger

  • Genetic variability of CYP2B6 in populations of African and Asian origin: allele frequencies, novel functional variants, and possible implications for anti-HIV therapy with efavirenz.

    Kathrin Klein;Thomas Lang;Tanja Saussele;Eduardo Barbosa-Sicard

  • Azathioprine therapy and adverse drug reactions in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: impact of thiopurine S-methyltransferase polymorphism

    Matthias Schwab;Elke Schäffeler;Claudia Marx;Christine Fischer

Frequent Co-Authors

Kathrin Klein
Kathrin Klein Robert Bosch (Germany)
Matthias Schwab
Matthias Schwab University of Tübingen
Michel Eichelbaum
Michel Eichelbaum University of Tübingen
Ute Hofmann
Ute Hofmann University of Tübingen
Thomas Lang
Thomas Lang University of California, San Francisco
Jürgen Brockmöller
Jürgen Brockmöller University of Göttingen
Andreas K. Nussler
Andreas K. Nussler University of Tübingen
Dieter Häussinger
Dieter Häussinger Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Heyo K. Kroemer
Heyo K. Kroemer University of Göttingen
Martin F. Fromm
Martin F. Fromm University of Erlangen-Nuremberg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in genetics can open doors to several connected fields and flexible online programs. For those interested in working in healthcare, easy nursing schools to get into provide accessible pathways to a rewarding nursing career, often with entry requirements that suit a range of academic backgrounds.

Many students find that studying genetics equips them with the analytical skills needed for online healthcare administration degree programs. These accelerated degrees can help graduates quickly transition into leadership roles within the growing healthcare sector. Affordable education is also a top concern, and options like healthcare administration programs that are both flexible and budget-friendly are increasingly popular.

Additionally, for those who wish to leverage their genetics knowledge without direct patient care, cheap medical billing and coding classes online offer an entry point into the essential administrative side of medicine. These related pathways help genetics graduates diversify their skills and explore new areas in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Ulrich M. Zanger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles