World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jürgen Brockmöller

Jürgen Brockmöller

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
98
Citations
37328
World Ranking
8893
National Ranking
498

Jürgen Brockmöller publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jürgen Brockmöller sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 323 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jürgen Brockmöller D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jürgen Brockmöller sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jürgen Brockmöller is affiliated with the University of Göttingen in Germany. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology.

The scientist has contributed extensively to various topics, including:

  • Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
  • Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
  • Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism
  • Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry

Jürgen Brockmöller's research has been published frequently in notable scientific venues. The most common publication venues include:

  • Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
  • Frontiers in Pharmacology
  • Biochemical Pharmacology
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Recent publications by Brockmöller include:

  • "Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: Expert Guidelines," 2020, Clinical Neurophysiology
  • "CYP2B6 Functional Variability in Drug Metabolism and Exposure Across Populations-Implication for Drug Safety, Dosing, and Individualized Therapy," 2021, Frontiers in Genetics
  • "Differences in Metformin and Thiamine Uptake between Human and Mouse Organic Cation Transporter 1: Structural Determinants and Potential Consequences for Intrahepatic Concentrations," 2020, Drug Metabolism and Disposition
  • "Identification of Novel High-Affinity Substrates of OCT1 Using Machine Learning-Guided Virtual Screening and Experimental Validation," 2021, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
  • "The mystery of the human proton-organic cation antiporter: One transport protein or many?," 2022, Pharmacology & Therapeutics

The scientist frequently collaborates with colleagues including Ole Jensen, Lukas Gebauer, Christof Dücker, Mladen V. Tzvetkov, and Muhammad Rafehi. The counts of publications coauthored with these individuals range from 7 to 18.

Jürgen Brockmöller's work covers a range of subfields in study, prominently:

  • Oncology
  • Pharmacology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
  • Biochemistry

Best Publications

  • Functional polymorphisms of the human multidrug-resistance gene: Multiple sequence variations and correlation of one allele with P-glycoprotein expression and activity in vivo

    S. Hoffmeyer;O. Burk;O. von Richter;H. P. Arnold

  • Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: Expert Guidelines

    Simone Rossi;Andrea Antal;Sven Bestmann;Marom Bikson

  • Cytochrome P450 2D6 variants in a Caucasian population: allele frequencies and phenotypic consequences.

    C Sachse;J Brockmöller;S Bauer;I Roots

  • Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines

    A. Antal;Ivan Alekseichuk;M. Bikson;J. Brockmöller

  • Functional significance of a C-->A polymorphism in intron 1 of the cytochrome P450 CYP1A2 gene tested with caffeine

    Christoph Sachse;Jürgen Brockmöller;Steffen Bauer;Ivar Roots

  • Pharmacogenetics of antidepressants and antipsychotics: the contribution of allelic variations to the phenotype of drug response

    Kirchheiner J;Nickchen K;Bauer M;Wong Ml

  • The genetic determinants of the CYP3A5 polymorphism

    Elisabeth Hustert;Michael Haberl;Oliver Burk;Renzo Wolbold

  • Clinical consequences of cytochrome P450 2C9 polymorphisms.

    Julia Kirchheiner;Jürgen Brockmöller

  • Nomenclature for human CYP2D6 alleles.

    A K Daly;J Brockmoller;F Broly;M Eichelbaum

  • CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotype-based dose recommendations for antidepressants: a first step towards subpopulation-specific dosages.

    J Kirchheiner;K Brosen;Marja-Liisa Dahl;LF Gram

  • NAD(P)H Oxidase and Multidrug Resistance Protein Genetic Polymorphisms Are Associated With Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiotoxicity

    Leszek Wojnowski;Bettina Kulle;Markus Schirmer;Gregor Schlüter

  • Pharmacokinetics of codeine and its metabolite morphine in ultra-rapid metabolizers due to CYP2D6 duplication.

    J Kirchheiner;H Schmidt;M Tzvetkov;J-T H A Keulen

  • Combined Analysis of Inherited Polymorphisms in Arylamine N-Acetyltransferase 2, Glutathione S-Transferases M1 and T1, Microsomal Epoxide Hydrolase, and Cytochrome P450 Enzymes as Modulators of Bladder Cancer Risk

    Jürgen Brockmöller;Ingolf Cascorbi;Reinhold Kerb;Ivar Roots

  • A C4887A polymorphism in exon 7 of human CYP1A1: population frequency, mutation linkages, and impact on lung cancer susceptibility.

    Ingolf Cascorbi;Jürgen Brockmöller;Ivar Roots

  • Arylamine N-acetyltransferase (NAT2) mutations and their allelic linkage in unrelated Caucasian individuals: correlation with phenotypic activity.

    I Cascorbi;N Drakoulis;J Brockmöller;A Maurer

  • Interindividual variability and tissue-specificity in the expression of cytochrome P450 3A mRNA.

    Ina Koch;Regina Weil;Renzo Wolbold;Jürgen Brockmöller

  • Modulation of steady-state kinetics of digoxin by haplotypes of the P-glycoprotein MDR1 gene.

    Andreas Johne;Karla Köpke;Thomas Gerloff;Ingrid Mai

  • Polymorphisms of drug-metabolizing enzymes CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP1A1, NAT2 and of P-glycoprotein in a Russian population

    Elena A. Gaikovitch;Ingolf Cascorbi;Przemyslaw M. Mrozikiewicz;Jürgen Brockmöller

  • The Effects of Genetic Polymorphisms in the Organic Cation Transporters OCT1, OCT2, and OCT3 on the Renal Clearance of Metformin

    V. Mladen Tzvetkov;V. Stefan Vormfelde;Daniela Balen;Ingolf Meineke

  • Meta- and pooled analyses of the effects of glutathione S-transferase M1 polymorphisms and smoking on lung cancer risk

    Simone Benhamou;Won Jin Lee;Anna Karin Alexandrie;Paolo Boffetta

Frequent Co-Authors

Ivar Roots
Ivar Roots Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Ingolf Cascorbi
Ingolf Cascorbi Kiel University
Paolo Boffetta
Paolo Boffetta Stony Brook Medicine
Ann K. Daly
Ann K. Daly Newcastle University
Ulrich M. Zanger
Ulrich M. Zanger Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology
Walter Paulus
Walter Paulus University of Göttingen
Stephanie J. London
Stephanie J. London National Institutes of Health
Paolo Vineis
Paolo Vineis Imperial College London
Peter Nürnberg
Peter Nürnberg University of Cologne
Magnus Ingelman-Sundberg
Magnus Ingelman-Sundberg Karolinska Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in studying Medicine in the USA, there are several related online degrees and flexible career pathways worth considering. Many students look for easy nursing schools to get into as a practical entry point into the healthcare field. These programs often have less stringent admission requirements, making them more accessible for those new to healthcare.

For those who prefer administrative roles, earning a degree in healthcare management is another in-demand option. You can choose from some of the healthcare administration degree programs that offer accelerated online formats for faster completion and greater flexibility.

If becoming a nurse is your goal but standardized admission tests are a barrier, consider applying to nursing schools that don't require teas or HESI exams. This can streamline the application process and help you enter the field sooner.

Additionally, those seeking medical support positions can benefit from enrolling in online medical coding classes with financial aid. These programs provide training for essential healthcare roles and often provide financial support opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Jürgen Brockmöller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles