World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
57
Citations
10591
World Ranking
13943
National Ranking
987

Ute Hofmann publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ute Hofmann sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 239 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Ute Hofmann D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ute Hofmann sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ute Hofmann is affiliated with the University of Tübingen in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with significant contributions across multiple subfields including molecular biology, pharmacology, oncology, epidemiology, and cancer research.

Their work explores a range of topics, including:

  • Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
  • Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
  • Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
  • Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
  • Liver Disease and Transplantation

They have published extensively, with notable papers such as:

  • "Interruption of bile acid uptake by hepatocytes after acetaminophen overdose ameliorates hepatotoxicity," 2022, Journal of Hepatology
  • "Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Activate the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor and the Constitutive Androstane Receptor to Regulate Xenobiotic Metabolism in Human Liver Cells," 2020, International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • "Severe metabolic alterations in liver cancer lead to ERK pathway activation and drug resistance," 2020, EBioMedicine
  • "Progesterone receptor membrane component 1 regulates lipid homeostasis and drives oncogenic signaling resulting in breast cancer progression," 2020, Breast Cancer Research
  • "Transcriptomic Cross-Species Analysis of Chronic Liver Disease Reveals Consistent Regulation Between Humans and Mice," 2021, Hepatology Communications

Their research has appeared frequently in the following venues:

  • Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie
  • Journal of Hepatology
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Frontiers in Pharmacology
  • Breast Cancer Research

Ute Hofmann has collaborated with several frequent co-authors including:

  • Matthias Schwab
  • Jan G. Hengstler
  • Ahmed Ghallab
  • Reham Hassan
  • Maiju Myllys

Their research integrates aspects of drug metabolism, liver disease mechanisms, and cancer biology, often employing molecular and pharmacological approaches to address complex biomedical questions. The intersection of hepatotoxicity, metabolism, and cancer resistance mechanisms forms a critical component of their scientific contributions.

Best Publications

  • Extensive genetic polymorphism in the human CYP2B6 gene with impact on expression and function in human liver.

    Thomas Lang;Kathrin Klein;Joachim Fischer;Andreas K. Nüssler

  • Role of Genetic and Nongenetic Factors for Fluorouracil Treatment-Related Severe Toxicity: A Prospective Clinical Trial by the German 5-FU Toxicity Study Group

    Matthias Schwab;Ulrich M. Zanger;Claudia Marx;Elke Schaeffeler

  • NUDT15 polymorphisms alter thiopurine metabolism and hematopoietic toxicity

    Takaya Moriyama;Takaya Moriyama;Rina Nishii;Rina Nishii;Virginia Perez-Andreu;Wenjian Yang

  • Gabapentin enhances the analgesic effect of morphine in healthy volunteers.

    Klaus Eckhardt;Susanne Ammon;Ute Hofmann;Anja Riebe

  • MDR1 gene polymorphisms and disposition of the P‐glycoprotein substrate fexofenadine

    Siegfried Drescher;Elke Schaeffeler;Monika Hitzl;Ute Hofmann

  • Antipyrine as a probe for human oxidative drug metabolism: Identification of the cytochrome P450 enzymes catalyzing 4‐hydroxyantipyrine, 3‐hydroxymethylantipyrine, and norantipyrine formation

    Georg Engel;Georg Engel;Ute Hofmann;Ute Hofmann;Hugo Heidemann;Hugo Heidemann;Jose Cosme;Jose Cosme

  • Cyclophosphamide pharmacokinetics and dose requirements in patients with renal insufficiency.

    Marion Haubitz;Frank Bohnenstengel;Reinhard Brunkhorst;Matthias Schwab

  • Fexofenadine pharmacokinetics are associated with a polymorphism of the SLCO1B1 gene (encoding OATP1B1).

    Mikko Niemi;Kari T. Kivistö;Ute Hofmann;Matthias Schwab

  • Proton pump inhibitors inhibit metformin uptake by organic cation transporters (OCTs)

    Anne T. Nies;Ute Hofmann;Ute Hofmann;Claudia Resch;Claudia Resch;Elke Schaeffeler;Elke Schaeffeler

  • Acute effects of pravastatin on cholesterol synthesis are associated with SLCO1B1 (encoding OATP1B1) haplotype *17.

    Mikko Niemi;Pertti J Neuvonen;Ute Hofmann;Janne T Backman

  • Pharmacokinetic modelling of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid of neurosurgical patients after short-term infusion of morphine.

    Ingolf Meineke;Stefan Freudenthaler;Stefan Freudenthaler;Ute Hofmann;Elke Schaeffeler

  • DNA methylation is associated with downregulation of the organic cation transporter OCT1 (SLC22A1) in human hepatocellular carcinoma

    Elke Schaeffeler;Claus Hellerbrand;Anne T Nies;Stefan Winter

  • UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) Polymorphisms Affect Atorvastatin Lactonization In Vitro and In Vivo

    S Riedmaier;S Riedmaier;K Klein;K Klein;U Hofmann;U Hofmann;J E Keskitalo

  • Impact of the SLCO1B1 polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics and lipid-lowering efficacy of multiple-dose pravastatin

    Michael Igel;Katja A. Arnold;Mikko Niemi;Ute Hofmann

  • Profiling Induction of Cytochrome P450 Enzyme Activity by Statins Using a New Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Cocktail Assay in Human Hepatocytes

    Diana M Feidt;Kathrin Klein;Ute Hofmann;Stephan Riedmaier

  • Loss of analgesic effect of morphine due to coadministration of rifampin

    Martin F Fromm;Klaus Eckhardt;Shuxia Li;Gerhard Schänzle

  • Liver cancer cell lines distinctly mimic the metabolic gene expression pattern of the corresponding human tumours.

    Zeribe C. Nwosu;Nadia Battello;Melanie Rothley;Melanie Rothley;Weronika Piorońska

  • 6-Thioguanosine Diphosphate and Triphosphate Levels in Red Blood Cells and Response to Azathioprine Therapy in Crohn’s Disease

    Markus F. Neurath;Ralf Kiesslich;Ute Teichgräber;Christine Fischer

  • A systematic evaluation of the use of physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling for cross-species extrapolation.

    Christoph Thiel;Christoph Thiel;Sebastian Schneckener;Markus Krauss;Markus Krauss;Ahmed Ghallab

  • Influence of age and cytochrome P450 2C9 genotype on the steady-state disposition of diclofenac and celecoxib.

    Stefanie S. Brenner;Charlotte Herrlinger;Karin Dilger;Thomas E. Mürdter

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthias Schwab
Matthias Schwab University of Tübingen
Michel Eichelbaum
Michel Eichelbaum University of Tübingen
Ulrich M. Zanger
Ulrich M. Zanger Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology
Martin F. Fromm
Martin F. Fromm University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Kathrin Klein
Kathrin Klein Robert Bosch (Germany)
Jan G. Hengstler
Jan G. Hengstler TU Dortmund University
Rolf Gebhardt
Rolf Gebhardt Leipzig University
Heyo K. Kroemer
Heyo K. Kroemer University of Göttingen
Markus F. Neurath
Markus F. Neurath University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Ulrich Klotz
Ulrich Klotz Robert Bosch (Germany)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry can open the door to diverse online degrees and rewarding career pathways across the healthcare and life sciences fields. Many students complement their scientific background with business expertise by pursuing an affordable online mba healthcare management program, which can prepare graduates for leadership roles in hospitals, biotech firms, and health service organizations.

Another popular option is entering the rapidly growing field of healthcare administration through roles such as medical coder or medical biller. If you are wondering how much do medical coders make, salaries are often competitive, with the opportunity for higher earnings as experience and certifications increase. It’s also helpful to understand the differences between major credentials: explore ccs vs cpc certification to determine the best certification pathway based on your career goals.

If you’re considering this sector, it’s important to weigh the pros and cons. Explore whether is medical billing and coding a good career, including job stability, remote work opportunities, and growth trends. A foundation in Biology and Biochemistry can give you a strong edge as you pursue these dynamic healthcare careers.

Best Scientists Citing Ute Hofmann

Trending Scientists