World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 49 5654 5252 266 255 118 10349

Peter F. de Jong publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter F. de Jong between 1988 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter F. de Jong published across 39 years, from 1988 to 2026, averaging 3.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2021. 5 of the 139 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2021. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 5 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 3 publications 2026: 2 publications
1988 2026

139 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter F. de Jong: publications per year, 1988 to 2026
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 2
1996 1
1997 0
1998 1
1999 2
2000 2
2001 2
2002 1
2003 3
2004 5
2005 1
2006 5
2007 4
2008 3
2009 2
2010 5
2011 5
2012 4
2013 4
2014 5
2015 9
2016 7
2017 11
2018 9
2019 2
2020 3
2021 13
2022 8
2023 6
2024 8
2025 3
2026 2
Total 139
Download as CSV

Peter F. de Jong publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter F. de Jong sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 118 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 118
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter F. de Jong D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter F. de Jong sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 49
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Peter F. de Jong is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily explores environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences, with a particular focus on plant science, ecology, and environmental engineering.

The scientist has contributed to studies in horticultural and viticultural research and specialized applications of remote sensing technologies in agriculture. Their work also addresses plant pathogens and fungal diseases, plant-microbe interactions and immunity, as well as leaf properties and growth measurement.

Frequent publication venues include:

  • Biosystems Engineering
  • European Journal of Plant Pathology
  • Data in Brief
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Key recent papers authored or co-authored by Peter F. de Jong include:

  • "Automatic flower cluster estimation in apple orchards using aerial and ground based point clouds" (2022, Biosystems Engineering)
  • "Detecting the asymptomatic colonization of apple branches by Neonectria ditissima, causing European canker of apple" (2023, European Journal of Plant Pathology)
  • "Data on three-year flowering intensity monitoring in an apple orchard: A collection of RGB images acquired from unmanned aerial vehicles" (2023, Data in Brief)
  • "Data on Three-Year Flowering Intensity Monitoring in an Apple Orchard: A Collection of RGB Images Acquired from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles" (2023, SSRN Electronic Journal)

The scientist collaborates regularly with a group of co-authors, several of whom have contributed to multiple publications alongside them. These co-authors include João Valente, Lammert Kooistra, Chenglong Zhang, Pieter van Dalfsen, and Bert Rijk.

Peter F. de Jong's research integrates remote sensing and LiDAR applications to advance understanding of flowering intensity, plant disease detection, and environmental monitoring within apple orchards. Their work combines aerial and ground-based data collection techniques to enhance agricultural monitoring practices.

Best Publications

  • Home Literacy: Opportunity, Instruction, Cooperation and Social-Emotional Quality Predicting Early Reading Achievement

    Paul P.M. Leseman;Peter F. De Jong

  • Executive Functioning in Children, and Its Relations with Reasoning, Reading, and Arithmetic.

    Sophie van der Sluis;Peter F. de Jong;Aryan van der Leij

  • Specific contributions of phonological abilities to early reading acquisition: Results from a Dutch latent variable longitudinal study

    Unknown

  • Effects of phonological abilities and linguistic comprehension on the development of reading.

    Peter F. de Jong;Aryan van der Leij

  • Developmental changes in the manifestation of a phonological deficit in dyslexic children learning to read a regular orthography.

    Peter F. de Jong;Aryan van der Leij

  • Lasting Effects of Home Literacy on Reading Achievement in School.

    Peter F de Jong;Paul P.M Leseman

  • Inhibition and shifting in children with learning deficits in arithmetic and reading

    Sophie van der Sluis;Peter F de Jong;Aryan van der Leij

  • Why are home-literacy environment and children’s reading skills associated? What parental skills reveal

    Elsje van Bergen;Titia L. Van Zuijen;Dorothy Bishop;Peter F. de Jong

  • Phonological Awareness and Rapid Automatized Naming as Longitudinal Predictors of Reading in Five Alphabetic Orthographies with Varying Degrees of Consistency

    Karin Landerl;H. Harald Freudenthaler;Moritz Heene;Peter F. De Jong

  • A Cross-Linguistic Comparison of Children Learning to Read in English and Dutch.

    Tanya K. Patel;Margaret J. Snowling;Peter F. de Jong

  • The intergenerational multiple deficit model and the case of dyslexia

    Elsje evan Bergen;Aryan evan der Leij;Peter F. De Jong

  • Working Memory in Dutch Children with Reading- and Arithmetic-Related LD

    Sophie van der Sluis;Aryan van der Leij;Peter F. de Jong

  • The effect of word length on lexical decision in dyslexic and normal reading children

    Vanessa E.G. Martens;Peter F. de Jong

  • Child and Parental Literacy Levels within Families with a History of Dyslexia.

    Elsje Van Bergen;Peter F. De Jong;Anna Plakas;Ben A M Maassen

  • Genome-wide analyses of individual differences in quantitatively assessed reading- and language-related skills in up to 34,000 people

    Unknown

  • Teachers’ self-efficacy in relation to individual students with a variety of social–emotional behaviors: A multilevel investigation

    Marjolein Zee;Peter F. de Jong;Helma M. Y. Koomen

  • Word, nonword, and visual paired associate learning in Dutch dyslexic children.

    Vera C.S Messbauer;Peter F de Jong

  • Orthographic Learning During Oral and Silent Reading

    Peter F. de Jong;David L. Share

  • Precursors of developmental dyslexia: an overview of the longitudinal Dutch Dyslexia Programme study

    Aryan van der Leij;Elsje Van Bergen;Elsje Van Bergen;Titia L. Van Zuijen;Peter De Jong

  • Early predictors of letter knowledge.

    P.F de Jong;R.K Olson

  • Rapid automatic naming: Easy to measure, hard to improve (quickly)

    Peter F. de Jong;Lidy Oude Vrielink

  • Does phonological recoding occur during silent reading, and is it necessary for orthographic learning?

    Peter F de Jong;Daniëlle J L Bitter;Margot van Setten;Eva Marinus

Frequent Co-Authors

Ludo Verhoeven
Ludo Verhoeven Radboud University
Helma M.Y. Koomen
Helma M.Y. Koomen University of Amsterdam
Ben Maassen
Ben Maassen University of Groningen
Eliane Segers
Eliane Segers Radboud University
Rauno Parrila
Rauno Parrila Macquarie University
Paul P.M. Leseman
Paul P.M. Leseman Utrecht University
Karin Landerl
Karin Landerl University of Graz
Evelyn H. Kroesbergen
Evelyn H. Kroesbergen Radboud University
Kate Nation
Kate Nation University of Oxford
Dorothy V. M. Bishop
Dorothy V. M. Bishop University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens the door to numerous online programs and career opportunities. A popular and growing pathway is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), which is essential for those interested in applied behavior analysis.

Those seeking to work as a BCBA in different states should be aware that requirements can vary. For example, the Honolulu bcba requirements involve meeting specific educational, examination, and supervised experience standards unique to Hawaii. Meanwhile, if you are exploring how to become a bcba in Houston, you'll find Texas has its own benchmarks and professional considerations.

Similarly, prospective behavior analysts can learn more about becoming a bcba in Huntsville and discover the credentials needed to practice in Alabama. Indiana also has state-specific routes; check out how to become a bcba in Indianapolis for more information.

As you research these pathways, consider accredited online degrees that align with your state’s licensure requirements. This flexibility allows students nationwide to begin pursuing advanced psychology careers, even before relocating or practicing in a specific state.

Best Scientists Citing Peter F. de Jong

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles