World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Pierluigi Zoccolotti

Pierluigi Zoccolotti

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
53
Citations
9414
World Ranking
4847
National Ranking
81

Pierluigi Zoccolotti publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pierluigi Zoccolotti sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 201 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Pierluigi Zoccolotti D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pierluigi Zoccolotti sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Pierluigi Zoccolotti is affiliated with Sapienza University of Rome in Italy. Their research spans multiple disciplines including psychology, medicine, and neuroscience, with a notable focus on developmental and educational psychology as well as cognitive neuroscience.

The scientist's recent publications cover a range of topics related to language development, motor imagery, cognitive skills, and neurorehabilitation. Selected recent papers include:

  • Efficacy of the Treatment of Developmental Language Disorder: A Systematic Review, 2021, Brain Sciences
  • Motor Imagery and Sport Performance: A Systematic Review on the PETTLEP Model, 2022, Applied Sciences
  • Domain-General Cognitive Skills in Children with Mathematical Difficulties and Dyscalculia: A Systematic Review of the Literature, 2022, Brain Sciences
  • Motor imagery and gait control in Parkinson's disease: techniques and new perspectives in neurorehabilitation, 2021, Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics
  • Differentiation among bio- and augmented- feedback in technologically assisted rehabilitation, 2021, Expert Review of Medical Devices

The main fields of study for Pierluigi Zoccolotti include:

  • Psychology
  • Medicine
  • Neuroscience

Subfields where their work is concentrated are:

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Statistics and Probability
  • Education
  • Epidemiology

The scientist's primary research themes encompass topics such as:

  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Language Development and Disorders
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

Frequent coauthors in their collaborative network include:

  • Chiara Valeria Marinelli
  • Maria De Luca
  • Donatella Spinelli
  • Paola Angelelli
  • Mauro Mancuso

The researcher has published notably in venues such as:

  • Brain Sciences
  • OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • PLoS ONE

Among book publications, Pierluigi Zoccolotti has contributed to "Reviews in Neurorehabilitation" published by Frontiers Media in 2024.

Best Publications

  • Word length effect in early reading and in developmental dyslexia.

    Pierluigi Zoccolotti;Maria De Luca;Enrico Di Pace;Filippo Gasperini

  • Cognitive rehabilitation of the hemineglect disorder in chronic patients with unilateral right brain damage.

    L. Pizzamiglio;G. Antonucci;A. Judica;P. Montenero

  • Crowding, reading, and developmental dyslexia.

    Marialuisa Martelli;Gloria Di Filippo;Donatella Spinelli;Pierluigi Zoccolotti

  • Reading words and pseudowords: an eye movement study of developmental dyslexia.

    Maria De Luca;Marta Borrelli;Anna Judica;Donatella Spinelli

  • Effectiveness of neglect rehabilitation in a randomized group study.

    Gabriella Antonucci;Cecilia Guariglia;Anna Judica;Luisa Magnotti

  • Eye movement patterns in linguistic and non-linguistic tasks in developmental surface dyslexia.

    Maria De Luca;Enrico Di Pace;Anna Judica;Donatella Spinelli

  • Crowding effects on word identification in developmental dyslexia.

    Donatella Spinelli;Maria De Luca;Anna Judica;Pierluigi Zoccolotti

  • Markers of developmental surface dyslexia in a language (Italian) with high grapheme–phoneme correspondence

    Pierluigi Zoccolotti;Maria De Luca;Enrico Di Pace;Anna Judica

  • Left/right and cortical/subcortical dichotomies in the neuropsychological study of human emotions

    Guido Gainotti;Carlo Caltagirone;Pierluigi Zoccolotti

  • Morpheme-based reading aloud: evidence from dyslexic and skilled Italian readers.

    Cristina Burani;Stefania Marcolini;Maria De Luca;Pierluigi Zoccolotti

  • Rehabilitation treatments for adults with behavioral and psychosocial disorders following acquired brain injury: A systematic review

    Raffaella Cattelani;Marina Zettin;Pierluigi Zoccolotti

  • Length effect in word naming in reading: role of reading experience and reading deficit in italian readers.

    Donatella Spinelli;Maria De Luca;Gloria Di Filippo;Monica Mancini

  • Field dependence and lateralization of verbal and configurational processing.

    Pierluigi Zoccolotti;Philip K. Oltman

  • Do phonologic and rapid automatized naming deficits differentially affect dyslexic children with and without a history of language delay? A study of Italian dyslexic children.

    Daniela Brizzolara;Anna Chilosi;Paola Cipriani;Gloria Di Filippo

  • Toward a comprehensive diagnosis of visual-spatial disorders in unilateral brain damaged patients.

    Luigi Pizzamiglio;A. Judica;C. Razzano;Pierluigi Zoccolotti

  • Facilitatory effect of neglect rehabilitation on the recovery of left hemiplegic stroke patients: a cross-over study.

    Stefano Paolucci;Gabriella Antonucci;Cecilia Guariglia;Luisa Magnotti

  • The Wundt-Jastrow illusion in the study of spatial hemi-inattention

    Manfredo Massironi;Gabriella Antonucci;Luigi Pizzamiglio;Maura Viviana Vitale

  • Rapid naming, not cancellation speed or articulation rate, predicts reading in an orthographically regular language (Italian)

    Gloria Di Filippo;Daniela Brizzolara;Anna Chilosi;Maria De Luca

  • Functional evaluation of hemineglect by means of a semistructured scale: Personal extrapersonal differentiation

    P. Zoccolotti;A. Judica

  • Reading development in an orthographically regular language: effects of length, frequency, lexicality and global processing ability

    Pierluigi Zoccolotti;Maria De Luca;Gloria Di Filippo;Anna Judica

  • Italian developmental dyslexic and proficient readers : Where are the differences?

    Laura Barca;Cristina Burani;Gloria Di Filippo;Pierluigi Zoccolotti

Frequent Co-Authors

Donatella Spinelli
Donatella Spinelli Sapienza University of Rome
Luigi Pizzamiglio
Luigi Pizzamiglio Sapienza University of Rome
Gabriella Antonucci
Gabriella Antonucci Sapienza University of Rome
Cristina Burani
Cristina Burani National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
Cecilia Guariglia
Cecilia Guariglia Sapienza University of Rome
Carlo Caltagirone
Carlo Caltagirone Fondazione Santa Lucia
Claudio Luzzatti
Claudio Luzzatti University of Milano-Bicocca
Guido Gainotti
Guido Gainotti Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Stefano F. Cappa
Stefano F. Cappa Istituto Universitario Di Studi Superiori Di Pavia
Giuseppe Vallar
Giuseppe Vallar University of Milano-Bicocca

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens up a variety of flexible academic and career opportunities. Many students choose online psychology programs for their adaptability and accessibility, especially when balancing work or family commitments. Exploring easiest online psychology bachelor's in Florida can help learners find programs that best fit their schedules and learning styles.

When considering traditional programs, look into resources like the top psychology programs in Wichita and the best psychology program rankings in Wyoming to discover well-ranked schools that offer robust curricula and strong reputations.

Alternatively, if convenience is a priority, researching the easiest online psychology bachelor's degrees in Houston can be a good starting point. Online degrees often provide similar career outcomes to on-campus programs, preparing graduates for roles in counseling, social work, research, and more. No matter which path you choose, these resources can help you compare options and make an informed decision for your future in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Pierluigi Zoccolotti

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles