World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Gabriella Antonucci

Gabriella Antonucci

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 33 10534 9857 244 240 83 4755

Gabriella Antonucci publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gabriella Antonucci between 1982 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gabriella Antonucci published across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025, averaging 3 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2021. 15 of the 134 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2021. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 0 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 6 publications
1982 2025

134 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gabriella Antonucci: publications per year, 1982 to 2025
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 0
1984 1
1985 0
1986 1
1987 0
1988 1
1989 2
1990 1
1991 0
1992 4
1993 3
1994 0
1995 4
1996 5
1997 2
1998 2
1999 3
2000 6
2001 7
2002 2
2003 3
2004 2
2005 0
2006 1
2007 0
2008 1
2009 0
2010 3
2011 2
2012 0
2013 2
2014 2
2015 4
2016 6
2017 4
2018 6
2019 8
2020 5
2021 10
2022 6
2023 9
2024 9
2025 6
Total 134
Download as CSV

Gabriella Antonucci publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gabriella Antonucci sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 83 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 83
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Gabriella Antonucci D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gabriella Antonucci sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 33
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Gabriella Antonucci is affiliated with Sapienza University of Rome in Italy. Their research spans multiple areas within Medicine and Neuroscience, with particular emphasis on Cognitive Neuroscience and Rehabilitation.

The scientist's recent publications include:

  • Disorganized Attachment pattern affects the perception of Affective Touch, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • The Michelangelo Effect: Art Improves the Performance in a Virtual Reality Task Developed for Upper Limb Neurorehabilitation, 2021, Frontiers in Psychology
  • Computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation in neurological patients: state-of-art and future perspectives, 2023, Frontiers in Neurology
  • Artificial Neural Network Analyzing Wearable Device Gait Data for Identifying Patients With Stroke Unable to Return to Work, 2021, Frontiers in Neurology
  • Prognostic Factors in Neurorehabilitation of Stroke: A Comparison among Regression, Neural Network, and Cluster Analyses, 2021, Brain Sciences

Frequent co-authors in their work include:

  • Marco Iosa
  • Stefano Paolucci
  • Giovanni Morone
  • Daniela De Bartolo
  • Gaetano Tieri

Their scholarly contributions have been published in several venues multiple times, notably:

  • Brain Sciences
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Frontiers in Neurology
  • Scientific Reports

The main fields of study covered are Medicine with 30 publications and Neuroscience with 22 publications. Within these, subfields include Cognitive Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Human-Computer Interaction, and Social Psychology.

Key research topics addressed by the scientist include:

  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
  • Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
  • Art Therapy and Mental Health
  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management

Best Publications

  • Cognitive rehabilitation of the hemineglect disorder in chronic patients with unilateral right brain damage.

    L. Pizzamiglio;G. Antonucci;A. Judica;P. Montenero

  • Effect of Optokinetic Stimulation in Patients with Visual Neglect

    L. Pizzamiglio;R. Frasca;C. Guariglia;C. Incoccia

  • Development of neuropsychiatric symptoms in poststroke patients: a cross‐sectional study

    P. Angelelli;S. Paolucci;U. Bivona;L. Piccardi

  • Effectiveness of neglect rehabilitation in a randomized group study.

    Gabriella Antonucci;Cecilia Guariglia;Anna Judica;Luisa Magnotti

  • Beyond unilateral neglect

    Edoardo Bisiach;Luigi Pizzamiglio;Daniele Nico;Gabriella Antonucci

  • The role of unilateral spatial neglect in rehabilitation of right brain–damaged ischemic stroke patients: A matched comparison

    Stefano Paolucci;Gabriella Antonucci;Maria Grazia Grasso;Luigi Pizzamiglio

  • Personal and extrapersonal space: a case of neglect dissociation

    Cecilia Guariglia;Gabriella Antonucci

  • Predicting stroke inpatient rehabilitation outcome: The prominent role of neuropsychological disorders

    Stefano Paolucci;Gabriella Antonucci;Emberti Gialloreti;Marco Traballesi

  • Facilitatory effect of neglect rehabilitation on the recovery of left hemiplegic stroke patients: a cross-over study.

    Stefano Paolucci;Gabriella Antonucci;Cecilia Guariglia;Luisa Magnotti

  • The Wundt-Jastrow illusion in the study of spatial hemi-inattention

    Manfredo Massironi;Gabriella Antonucci;Luigi Pizzamiglio;Maura Viviana Vitale

  • Deficits of position sense, unilateral neglect and optokinetic stimulation

    Giuseppe Vallar;Gabriella Antonucci;Gabriella Antonucci;Cecilia Guariglia;Luigi Pizzamiglio

  • Incidence and evolution of the hemineglect disorder in chronic patients with unilateral right brain damage.

    P. Zoccolotti;G. Antonucci;A. Judica;P. Montenero

  • The use of Optokinetic Stimulation in Rehabilitation of the Hemineglect Disorder

    Luigi Pizzamiglio;Luciano Fasotti;Mervi Jehkonen;Gabriella Antonucci

  • Exploring the syndrome of spatial unilateral neglect through an illusion of length

    Roberta Daini;Paola Angelelli;Gabriella Antonucci;Stefano F. Cappa

  • Psychometric Characteristics of Two Semi-structured Scales for the Functional Evaluation of Hemi- inattention in Extrapersonal and Personal Space

    P. Zoccolotti;G. Antonucci;A. Judica

  • Visual neglect for far and near extra-personal space in humans.

    L Pizzamiglio;S Cappa;G Vallar;P Zoccolotti

  • Rasch Analysis of the Rivermead Mobility Index: A Study Using Mobility Measures of First-Stroke Inpatients

    Gabriella Antonucci;Teresa Aprile;Stefano Paolucci

  • Processing of illusion of length in spatial hemineglect: a study of line bisection.

    G Vallar;R Daini;G Antonucci

  • Using the Oxford Cognitive Screen to Detect Cognitive Impairment in Stroke Patients: A Comparison with the Mini-Mental State Examination.

    Mauro Mancuso;Nele Demeyere;Laura Abbruzzese;Alessio Damora

  • The two dimensions of the body representation in women suffering from Anorexia Nervosa.

    Grazia Fernanda Spitoni;Andrea Serino;Armando Cotugno;Francesco Mancini

  • The gap between rod and frame influences the rod-and-frame effect with small and large inducing displays

    Pierluigi Zoccolotti;Gabriella Antonucci;Donatella Spinelli

Frequent Co-Authors

Pierluigi Zoccolotti
Pierluigi Zoccolotti Sapienza University of Rome
Luigi Pizzamiglio
Luigi Pizzamiglio Sapienza University of Rome
Cecilia Guariglia
Cecilia Guariglia Sapienza University of Rome
Donatella Spinelli
Donatella Spinelli Sapienza University of Rome
Giuseppe Vallar
Giuseppe Vallar University of Milano-Bicocca
Laura Piccardi
Laura Piccardi Sapienza University of Rome
Stefano F. Cappa
Stefano F. Cappa Istituto Universitario Di Studi Superiori Di Pavia
Cristina Ottaviani
Cristina Ottaviani Sapienza University of Rome
Luciano Fasotti
Luciano Fasotti Radboud University
Patrick Haggard
Patrick Haggard University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring an online degree in psychology opens diverse career opportunities across the mental health field. Many prospective students choose online programs for their flexibility and accessibility, gaining the knowledge necessary to pursue roles such as mental health counselor, behavioral analyst, or school psychologist.

Before practicing as a counselor, it’s important to understand the unique certification requirements in each region. If you're interested in becoming a counselor in Texas, see the steps for how to become a mental health counselor in Lubbock. For those in Wisconsin, review the Madison mental health counselor certification requirements.

Requirements can differ significantly by state or city. For example, you should look into the Memphis mental health counselor certification requirements or learn more about the Mesa mental health counselor certification requirements if you plan to practice in Tennessee or Arizona.

Researching these pathways ensures you meet state regulations and are well-prepared for licensure exams. By understanding your state’s requirements, you can better plan your online studies and professional future in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Gabriella Antonucci

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles