World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 39 9905 9623 4161 3988 183 4653

Paul Bogdan publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paul Bogdan between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paul Bogdan published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 13.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2021. 48 of the 269 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2021. 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 3 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 28 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 28 publications 2024: 22 publications 2025: 26 publications
2006 2025

269 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paul Bogdan: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 1
2007 3
2008 0
2009 1
2010 3
2011 10
2012 8
2013 12
2014 13
2015 17
2016 15
2017 10
2018 16
2019 16
2020 21
2021 28
2022 19
2023 28
2024 22
2025 26
Total 269
Download as CSV

Paul Bogdan publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Bogdan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 182–191 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 183 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583 183
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Paul Bogdan D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Bogdan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968 39
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Paul Bogdan is affiliated with the University of Southern California in the United States. Their research primarily lies within the field of Computer Science, covering a diverse range of subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Molecular Biology, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Hardware and Architecture.

Their work addresses multiple topics, notably:

  • Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Neural Networks and Applications
  • Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques

Paul Bogdan's recent publications demonstrate a range of interdisciplinary research combining computational methods with biological and cognitive studies. Sample recent papers include:

  • "An in silico deep learning approach to multi-epitope vaccine design: a SARS-CoV-2 case study," 2021, Scientific Reports
  • "Biomorphic structural batteries for robotics," 2020, Science Robotics
  • "Anatomically interpretable deep learning of brain age captures domain-specific cognitive impairment," 2023, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Network science characteristics of brain-derived neuronal cultures deciphered from quantitative phase imaging data," 2020, Scientific Reports
  • "A COVID-19 Rumor Dataset," 2021, Frontiers in Psychology

Their frequent collaborators include:

  • Shahin Nazarian (29 joint works)
  • Xiongye Xiao (28 joint works)
  • Mingxi Cheng (21 joint works)
  • Chenzhong Yin (19 joint works)
  • Sérgio Pequito (11 joint works)

Paul Bogdan contributes regularly to journals and repositories such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University) with 42 publications
  • Scientific Reports with 13 publications
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) with 6 publications
  • Research Square (Research Square) with 3 publications
  • Advanced Science with 3 publications

Best Publications

  • An in silico deep learning approach to multi-epitope vaccine design: a SARS-CoV-2 case study.

    Zikun Yang;Paul Bogdan;Shahin Nazarian

  • An Analytical Approach for Network-on-Chip Performance Analysis

    U Y Ogras;P Bogdan;R Marculescu

  • The Chip Is the Network: Toward a Science of Network-on-Chip Design

    Radu Marculescu;Paul Bogdan

  • Biomorphic structural batteries for robotics

    Mingqiang Wang;Drew Vecchio;Chunyan Wang;Ahmet Emre

  • Stochastic Communication: A New Paradigm for Fault-Tolerant Networks-on-Chip

    Paul Bogdan;Tudor Dumitraş;Radu Marculescu

  • Ollivier-Ricci Curvature-Based Method to Community Detection in Complex Networks.

    Jayson Sia;Edmond Jonckheere;Paul Bogdan

  • Non-Stationary Traffic Analysis and Its Implications on Multicore Platform Design

    P Bogdan;R Marculescu

  • Network science characteristics of brain-derived neuronal cultures deciphered from quantitative phase imaging data.

    Chenzhong Yin;Xiongye Xiao;Valeriu Balaban;Mikhail E. Kandel

  • Efficient Modeling and Simulation of Bacteria-Based Nanonetworks with BNSim

    Guopeng Wei;Paul Bogdan;Radu Marculescu

  • Reliable Multi-Fractal Characterization of Weighted Complex Networks: Algorithms and Implications.

    Yuankun Xue;Paul Bogdan

  • VRoC: Variational Autoencoder-aided Multi-task Rumor Classifier Based on Text

    Mingxi Cheng;Shahin Nazarian;Paul Bogdan

  • An Optimal Control Approach to Power Management for Multi-Voltage and Frequency Islands Multiprocessor Platforms under Highly Variable Workloads

    Paul Bogdan;Radu Marculescu;Siddharth Jain;Rafael Tornero Gavila

  • A COVID-19 Rumor Dataset

    Mingxi Cheng;Songli Wang;Xiaofeng Yan;Tianqi Yang

  • Statistical physics approaches for network-on-chip traffic characterization

    Paul Bogdan;Radu Marculescu

  • Mathematical Modeling and Control of Multifractal Workloads for Data-Center-on-a-Chip Optimization

    Paul Bogdan

  • Multiwavelet-based Operator Learning for Differential Equations

    Gaurav Gupta;Xiongye Xiao;Paul Bogdan

  • Self-Optimizing and Self-Programming Computing Systems: A Combined Compiler, Complex Networks, and Machine Learning Approach

    Yao Xiao;Shahin Nazarian;Paul Bogdan

  • Towards a Science of Cyber-Physical Systems Design

    Paul Bogdan;Radu Marculescu

  • User Cooperation Network Coding Approach for NoC Performance Improvement

    Yuankun Xue;Paul Bogdan

  • Workload characterization and its impact on multicore platform design

    Paul Bogdan;Radu Marculescu

  • Low-latency wireless 3D NoCs via randomized shortcut chips

    Hiroki Matsutani;Michihiro Koibuchi;Ikki Fujiwara;Takahiro Kagami

Frequent Co-Authors

Radu Marculescu
Radu Marculescu The University of Texas at Austin
Chi-Ying Tsui
Chi-Ying Tsui Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Massoud Pedram
Massoud Pedram University of Southern California
Yanzhi Wang
Yanzhi Wang Northeastern University
Partha Pratim Pande
Partha Pratim Pande Washington State University
Naehyuck Chang
Naehyuck Chang Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
George J. Pappas
George J. Pappas University of Pennsylvania
Metin Sitti
Metin Sitti Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems
Umit Y. Ogras
Umit Y. Ogras University of Wisconsin–Madison
Diana Marculescu
Diana Marculescu The University of Texas at Austin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring different online study options can help you find the best fit for your educational and career goals in computer science. If you’re just starting out, an online associate degree offers a flexible and cost-effective entry point. This pathway can quickly build foundational skills, making it possible to move into the workforce or transfer credits towards a bachelor’s degree.

Many students look for the cheapest online degrees to save on tuition and minimize debt. Fortunately, there are many accredited schools offering quality education at lower costs, helping students balance affordability and academic goals.

Not all universities have rigid admission requirements—some of the universities for low gpa accept applicants with less competitive GPAs. These institutions provide opportunities for career advancement through accessible online programs, helping more people join the tech workforce.

Degree versatility is another factor to consider. For example, if your interests evolve, it’s worth asking, what jobs can you get with an environmental science degree? Comparing the careers linked to different degrees can help you chart the best path for long-term success.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Bogdan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles