World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
86
Citations
39639
World Ranking
2914
National Ranking
211

Ian L. Sargent publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian L. Sargent sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 260 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Ian L. Sargent D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian L. Sargent sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ian L. Sargent is a researcher affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their work spans several interconnected fields, including Medicine, Immunology, and Microbiology, with a focus on cardiovascular health and related biological processes.

The scientist has contributed to subfields such as Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Immunology, and Surgery. These areas reflect a multidisciplinary approach to understanding disease mechanisms and therapeutic interventions.

Key topics in Ian L. Sargent's research include:

  • Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
  • Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Cardiovascular, Neuropeptides, and Oxidative Stress Research

A recent publication by Sargent is titled "Role of Lectin-like Oxidized LDL Receptor-1 and Syncytiotrophoblast Extracellular Vesicles in the Vascular Reactivity of Mouse Uterine Arteries During Pregnancy", published in 2020 in Scientific Reports. This paper explores vascular responses in pregnancy, contributing to cardiovascular and reproductive health research. It has been cited ten times, indicating engagement with the scientific community.

Frequent collaborators in their research include Floor Spaans, Anita Quon, Raven Kirschenman, Jude S. Morton, and Tatsuya Sawamura. These coauthors have worked with Sargent on various projects, reflecting a network of scholarly partnerships. The scientist's research output has been predominantly published in Scientific Reports, indicating a consistent presence in this journal.

Best Publications

  • Presence of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serum

    Y. M. Dennis Lo;Noemi Corbetta;Paul F. Chamberlain;Vik Rai

  • Latest advances in understanding preeclampsia.

    Christopher W. Redman;Ian L. Sargent

  • Sizing and phenotyping of cellular vesicles using Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis

    Rebecca A. Dragovic;Christopher Gardiner;Alexandra S. Brooks;Dionne S. Tannetta

  • Normal pregnancy and preeclampsia both produce inflammatory changes in peripheral blood leukocytes akin to those of sepsis.

    Gavin P. Sacks;Katarina Studena;Ian L. Sargent;Christopher W.G. Redman

  • Prenatal diagnosis of fetal RhD status by molecular analysis of maternal plasma.

    Y. M. D. Lo;N. M. Hjelm;C. Fidler;I. L. Sargent

  • Particle size distribution of exosomes and microvesicles determined by transmission electron microscopy, flow cytometry, nanoparticle tracking analysis, and resistive pulse sensing.

    E. van der Pol;F. A. W. Coumans;A. E. Grootemaat;C. Gardiner

  • Pre-eclampsia, the placenta and the maternal systemic inflammatory response--a review.

    C.W.G. Redman;I.L. Sargent

  • Immunology of Pre-Eclampsia

    Christopher W. G. Redman;Ian L. Sargent

  • Lysosomal dysfunction increases exosome-mediated alpha-synuclein release and transmission

    L Alvarez-Erviti;Y Seow;A H Schapira;C Gardiner

  • Placental stress and pre-eclampsia: a revised view.

    C.W.G. Redman;I.L. Sargent

  • Quantitative Abnormalities of Fetal DNA in Maternal Serum in Preeclampsia

    Y.M. Dennis Lo;Tse N. Leung;Mark S.C. Tein;Ian L. Sargent

  • Placental Debris, Oxidative Stress and Pre-eclampsia

    C.W.G. Redman;I.L. Sargent

  • Shedding of syncytiotrophoblast microvilli into the maternal circulation in pre‐eclamptic pregnancies

    Marian Knight;Christopher W. G. Redman;Elizabeth A. Linton;Ian L. Sargent

  • An innate view of human pregnancy.

    Gavin Sacks;Ian Sargent;Christopher Redman

  • Inflammation and pre-eclampsia

    A.M. Borzychowski;I.L. Sargent;C.W.G. Redman

  • Systemic Inflammatory Priming in Normal Pregnancy and Preeclampsia: The Role of Circulating Syncytiotrophoblast Microparticles

    Sarah J. Germain;Gavin P. Sacks;Suren R. Soorana;Ian L. Sargent

  • Exosome-mediated delivery of siRNA in vitro and in vivo

    Samir El-Andaloussi;Samir El-Andaloussi;Yi Lee;Samira Lakhal-Littleton;Jinghuan Li

  • Cardiovascular risk factors in children and young adults born to preeclamptic pregnancies: a systematic review.

    Esther Frances Davis;Merzaka Lazdam;Adam James Lewandowski;Stephanie Anne Worton

  • Extracellular vesicle sizing and enumeration by nanoparticle tracking analysis.

    Chris Gardiner;Yannick J. Ferreira;Rebecca A. Dragovic;Christopher W.G. Redman

  • IFPA Senior Award Lecture: making sense of pre-eclampsia - two placental causes of preeclampsia?

    C.W. Redman;I.L. Sargent;A.C. Staff

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher W.G. Redman
Christopher W.G. Redman University of Oxford
David H. Barlow
David H. Barlow Boston University
Paul J. Harrison
Paul J. Harrison University of Oxford
Rienk Nieuwland
Rienk Nieuwland University of Amsterdam
Daniel C. Anthony
Daniel C. Anthony University of Oxford
Stephen Kennedy
Stephen Kennedy University of Oxford
Tatsuya Sawamura
Tatsuya Sawamura Shinshu University
David J. P. Ferguson
David J. P. Ferguson University of Oxford
Yuk Ming Dennis Lo
Yuk Ming Dennis Lo Chinese University of Hong Kong
Alain Townsend
Alain Townsend University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry can open doors to rewarding online degrees and diverse career options. A popular pathway is medical coding. Before pursuing this field, it’s helpful to review medical.coding salary trends, as pay rates can vary and career growth depends on both experience and certifications.

Some may wonder, is medical coding a dying career? Despite automation concerns, demand for skilled professionals is still strong, especially with evolving health records systems and compliance needs.

For those interested in health data and technology, accredited health information management online programs offer flexible, affordable training. These programs lead to meaningful roles in hospitals, clinics, and research facilities by blending science, information technology, and administrative skills.

Another direction is nutrition. Earning an online nutrition masters degree can prepare you for careers in clinical practice, wellness consulting, or research. These online options make it easier than ever to advance your science career on your own schedule.

Best Scientists Citing Ian L. Sargent

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles