World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Matthew C. Brandley

Matthew C. Brandley

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
33
Citations
3891
World Ranking
7908
National Ranking
619

Matthew C. Brandley publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew C. Brandley sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 71 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Matthew C. Brandley D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew C. Brandley sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matthew C. Brandley is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia and specializes in research spanning the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, as well as Environmental Science. Their work covers several subfields including Genetics, Molecular Biology, Global and Planetary Change, Ecological Modeling, and Ecology.

The scientist's research topics include Genetic diversity and population structure, Identification and Quantification in Food, Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies, Amphibian and Reptile Biology, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Animal Behavior and Reproduction, and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior.

They have contributed to various scientific journals and publication venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Molecular Ecology
  • Ecology and Evolution
  • Molecular Ecology Resources
  • Journal of Biogeography

Recent significant papers authored or co-authored by Matthew C. Brandley include:

  • Emergence of an evolutionary innovation: Gene expression differences associated with the transition between oviparity and viviparity, 2020, Molecular Ecology
  • Historical museum samples enable the examination of divergent and parallel evolution during invasion, 2022, Molecular Ecology
  • Transcript- and annotation-guided genome assembly of the European starling, 2022, Molecular Ecology Resources
  • Transcript- and annotation-guided genome assembly of the European starling, 2021, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Comparing the dietary niche overlap and ecomorphological differences between invasive Hemidactylus mabouia geckos and a native gecko competitor, 2021, Ecology and Evolution

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Matthew C. Brandley include Katarina C. Stuart, William B. Sherwin, Melissa Bateson, Lee A. Rollins, and Dan L. Warren.

Best Publications

  • Partitioned Bayesian analyses, partition choice, and the phylogenetic relationships of scincid lizards.

    Matthew C. Brandley;Andreas Schmitz;Tod W. Reeder

  • Why does a trait evolve multiple times within a clade? Repeated evolution of snakelike body form in squamate reptiles

    John J. Wiens;Matthew C. Brandley;Tod W. Reeder

  • RATES AND PATTERNS IN THE EVOLUTION OF SNAKE-LIKE BODY FORM IN SQUAMATE REPTILES : EVIDENCE FOR REPEATED RE-EVOLUTION OF LOST DIGITS AND LONG-TERM PERSISTENCE OF INTERMEDIATE BODY FORMS

    Matthew C. Brandley;John P. Huelsenbeck;John J. Wiens

  • Accommodating Heterogenous Rates of Evolution in Molecular Divergence Dating Methods: An Example Using Intercontinental Dispersal of Plestiodon (Eumeces) Lizards

    Matthew C. Brandley;Matthew C. Brandley;Yuezhao Wang;Xianguang Guo;Adrián Nieto Montes de Oca

  • Seven new dolphin mitochondrial genomes and a time-calibrated phylogeny of whales

    Ye Xiong;Matthew C Brandley;Shixia Xu;Kaiya Zhou

  • Relaxed Clocks and Inferences of Heterogeneous Patterns of Nucleotide Substitution and Divergence Time Estimates across Whales and Dolphins (Mammalia: Cetacea)

    Alex Dornburg;Matthew C. Brandley;Matthew C. Brandley;Michael R. McGowen;Michael R. McGowen;Thomas J. Near;Thomas J. Near

  • The evolution of viviparity: molecular and genomic data from squamate reptiles advance understanding of live birth in amniotes

    James U Van Dyke;Matthew C Brandley;Michael B Thompson

  • A multi-locus phylogeny of Nectogalini shrews and influences of the paleoclimate on speciation and evolution

    Kai He;Ya-Jie Li;Ya-Jie Li;Matthew C. Brandley;Liang-Kong Lin

  • Ancestral state reconstructions require biological evidence to test evolutionary hypotheses: A case study examining the evolution of reproductive mode in squamate reptiles

    Oliver W. Griffith;Daniel G. Blackburn;Matthew C. Brandley;James U. Van Dyke

  • Evidence for determinism in species diversification and contingency in phenotypic evolution during adaptive radiation

    Frank T. Burbrink;Xin Chen;Edward A. Myers;Matthew C. Brandley

  • The phylogenetic systematics of blue-tailed skinks (Plestiodon) and the family Scincidae

    Matthew C. Brandley;Hidetoshi Ota;Tsutomu Hikida;Adrián Nieto Montes De Oca

  • Uterine Gene Expression in the Live-Bearing Lizard, Chalcides ocellatus, Reveals Convergence of Squamate Reptile and Mammalian Pregnancy Mechanisms

    Matthew C. Brandley;Matthew C. Brandley;Rebecca L. Young;Dan L. Warren;Michael B. Thompson

  • Opening the black box: phylogenetics and morphological evolution of the Malagasy fossorial lizards of the subfamily “Scincinae”

    A. Schmitz;M.C. Brandley;P. Mausfeld;M. Vences

  • Evaluating the performance of anchored hybrid enrichment at the tips of the tree of life: a phylogenetic analysis of Australian Eugongylus group scincid lizards

    Matthew C Brandley;Matthew C Brandley;Jason G Bragg;Sonal Singhal;David Gregory Chapple

  • Which came first: The lizard or the egg? Robustness in phylogenetic reconstruction of ancestral states.

    April M. Wright;Kathleen M. Lyons;Matthew C. Brandley;Matthew C. Brandley;David M. Hillis

  • Convergence in trophic morphology and feeding performance among piscivorous natricine snakes

    S. E. Vincent;M. C. Brandley;A. Herrel;M. E. Alfaro

  • Basking behavior predicts the evolution of heat tolerance in Australian rainforest lizards

    Martha M. Muñoz;Gary M. Langham;Matthew C. Brandley;Dan F. Rosauer

  • Herpetology

    Unknown

  • WHY DOES A TRAIT EVOLVE MULTIPLE TIMES WITHIN A CLADE? REPEATED EVOLUTION OF SNAKELINE BODY FORM IN SQUAMATE REPTILES

    Unknown

  • DATA AND DATA INTERPRETATION IN THE STUDY OF LIMB EVOLUTION: A REPLY TO GALIS ET AL. ON THE REEVOLUTION OF DIGITS IN THE LIZARD GENUS BACHIA

    Tiana Kohlsdorf;Vincent J. Lynch;Miguel T. Rodrigues;Matthew C. Brandley

  • PHYLOGENY, ECOMORPHOLOGICAL EVOLUTION, AND HISTORICAL BIOGEOGRAPHY OF THE ANOLIS CRISTATELLUS SERIES

    Matthew C. Brandley;Kevin de Queiroz

  • Homoplasy and Clade Support

    Matthew C. Brandley;Dan L. Warren;Adam D. Leaché;Adam D. Leaché;Jimmy A. McGuire

  • Boom and bust: ancient and recent diversification in bichirs (Polypteridae: Actinopterygii), a relictual lineage of ray-finned fishes.

    Thomas J. Near;Alex Dornburg;Masayoshi Tokita;Dai Suzuki

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael B. Thompson
Michael B. Thompson University of Sydney
Thomas J. Near
Thomas J. Near Yale University
Katherine Belov
Katherine Belov University of Sydney
Michael E. Alfaro
Michael E. Alfaro University of California, Los Angeles
Peter C. Wainwright
Peter C. Wainwright University of California, Davis
Hidetoshi Ota
Hidetoshi Ota University of Hyogo
Adam D. Leaché
Adam D. Leaché University of Washington
John J. Wiens
John J. Wiens University of Arizona
Günter P. Wagner
Günter P. Wagner Yale University
Melissa Bateson
Melissa Bateson Newcastle University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A background in Ecology and Evolution opens numerous doorways in research, conservation, and environmental policy. However, many students looking to expand their career options find related fields in social and behavioral sciences equally rewarding—and accessible through online programs.

For those interested in environmental impacts on society or community welfare, social work masters programs online offer pathways to careers in family services, public health, and advocacy. Understanding human behavior is also crucial in environmental education or conservation roles, making a masters in psychology online a valuable option for those seeking to work in outreach or counseling.

If your interests include helping communities cope with environmental or disaster-related mental health issues, pursuing an online masters in clinical mental health counseling can lead to roles providing direct support and intervention. For those drawn to investigative and legal intersections—such as environmental crime—exploring highest paying forensic psychology jobs might reveal lucrative and impactful career paths that align with your ecological and evolutionary background.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew C. Brandley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles