World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Emily Moriarty Lemmon

Emily Moriarty Lemmon

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
59
Citations
14127
World Ranking
2401
National Ranking
851

Emily Moriarty Lemmon publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emily Moriarty Lemmon sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 165 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Emily Moriarty Lemmon D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emily Moriarty Lemmon sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Emily Moriarty Lemmon is affiliated with Florida State University in the United States. Their research contributions span various aspects of biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, environmental science, and agricultural and biological sciences. The primary fields of study encompass biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with significant work also in environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences.

Their work includes extensive research in subfields such as ecology, evolution, behavior and systematics, genetics, global and planetary change, molecular biology, and ecology. The main topics addressed cover amphibian and reptile biology, genetic diversity and population structure, genomics and phylogenetic studies, plant and animal studies, plant diversity and evolution, evolution and paleontology studies, and animal behavior and reproduction.

Emily Moriarty Lemmon has published in a range of scientific journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Systematic Biology
  • Ecology and Evolution

Several recent papers highlight their work across different years and journals, including:

  • "The Perfect Storm: Gene Tree Estimation Error, Incomplete Lineage Sorting, and Ancient Gene Flow Explain the Most Recalcitrant Ancient Angiosperm Clade, Malpighiales," 2020, Systematic Biology
  • "Out of Sight, Out of Mind: Widespread Nuclear and Plastid-Nuclear Discordance in the Flowering Plant Genus Polemonium (Polemoniaceae) Suggests Widespread Historical Gene Flow Despite Limited Nuclear Signal," 2020, Systematic Biology
  • "Phylogeny and classification of Odonata using targeted genomics," 2021, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
  • "Genetic variation for adaptive traits is associated with polymorphic inversions in Littorina saxatilis," 2021, Evolution Letters
  • "Polyploidy breaks speciation barriers in Australian burrowing frogs Neobatrachus," 2020, PLoS Genetics

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Alan R. Lemmon
  • J. Scott Keogh
  • Stephen C. Donnellan
  • Eric R. L. Gordon
  • Ian G. Brennan

Best Publications

  • A comprehensive phylogeny of birds (Aves) using targeted next-generation DNA sequencing

    Richard O. Prum;Richard O. Prum;Jacob S. Berv;Alex Dornburg;Alex Dornburg;Alex Dornburg;Daniel J. Field;Daniel J. Field

  • Anchored Hybrid Enrichment for Massively High-Throughput Phylogenomics

    Alan R. Lemmon;Sandra A. Emme;Emily Moriarty Lemmon

  • A comprehensive phylogeny of birds (Aves) using targeted next-generation DNA sequencing

    Unknown

  • High-Throughput Genomic Data in Systematics and Phylogenetics

    Emily Moriarty Lemmon;Alan R. Lemmon

  • The Effect of Ambiguous Data on Phylogenetic Estimates Obtained by Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian Inference

    Alan R. Lemmon;Alan R. Lemmon;Jeremy M. Brown;Kathrin Stanger-Hall;Emily Moriarty Lemmon;Emily Moriarty Lemmon

  • Implementing and testing the multispecies coalescent model: A valuable paradigm for phylogenomics

    Scott V. Edwards;Zhenxiang Xi;Axel Janke;Brant C. Faircloth

  • Interrogating Genomic-Scale Data for Squamata (Lizards, Snakes, and Amphisbaenians) Shows no Support for Key Traditional Morphological Relationships

    Frank T Burbrink;Felipe G Grazziotin;R Alexander Pyron;David Cundall

  • When trees grow too long: investigating the causes of highly inaccurate bayesian branch-length estimates.

    Jeremy M. Brown;Jeremy M. Brown;Shannon M. Hedtke;Alan R. Lemmon;Alan R. Lemmon;Emily Moriarty Lemmon;Emily Moriarty Lemmon

  • A phylogenomic framework, evolutionary timeline and genomic resources for comparative studies of decapod crustaceans.

    Joanna M. Wolfe;Jesse W. Breinholt;Keith A. Crandall;Alan R. Lemmon

  • Phylogenomics uncovers early hybridization and adaptive loci shaping the radiation of Lake Tanganyika cichlid fishes

    Iker Irisarri;Pooja Singh;Pooja Singh;Stephan Koblmüller;Julián Torres-Dowdall

  • DIVERSIFICATION OF CONSPECIFIC SIGNALS IN SYMPATRY: GEOGRAPHIC OVERLAP DRIVES MULTIDIMENSIONAL REPRODUCTIVE CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT IN FROGS

    Emily Moriarty Lemmon;Emily Moriarty Lemmon

  • Phylogenomics Reveals Ancient Gene Tree Discordance in the Amphibian Tree of Life.

    Paul M Hime;Paul M Hime;Alan R Lemmon;Emily C Moriarty Lemmon;Elizabeth Prendini

  • Resolving Relationships among the Megadiverse Butterflies and Moths with a Novel Pipeline for Anchored Phylogenomics.

    Jesse W. Breinholt;Chandra Earl;Alan R. Lemmon;Emily Moriarty Lemmon

  • Evolution of lacewings and allied orders using anchored phylogenomics (Neuroptera, Megaloptera, Raphidioptera)

    Shaun L. Winterton;Alan R. Lemmon;Jessica P. Gillung;Ivonne J. Garzon

  • Phylogenomic Evidence Overturns Current Conceptions of Social Evolution in Wasps (Vespidae).

    Patrick K Piekarski;James M Carpenter;Alan R Lemmon;Emily Moriarty Lemmon

  • Expanding anchored hybrid enrichment to resolve both deep and shallow relationships within the spider tree of life

    Chris A. Hamilton;Alan R. Lemmon;Emily Moriarty Lemmon;Jason E. Bond

  • The Perfect Storm: Gene Tree Estimation Error, Incomplete Lineage Sorting, and Ancient Gene Flow Explain the Most Recalcitrant Ancient Angiosperm Clade, Malpighiales

    Liming Cai;Liming Cai;Zhenxiang Xi;Zhenxiang Xi;Emily Moriarty Lemmon;Alan R Lemmon

  • The impact of anchored phylogenomics and taxon sampling on phylogenetic inference in narrow‐mouthed frogs (Anura, Microhylidae)

    Pedro L.V. Peloso;Darrel R. Frost;Stephen J. Richards;Miguel T. Rodrigues

  • A high-throughput venom-gland transcriptome for the Eastern Diamondback Rattlesnake (Crotalus adamanteus) and evidence for pervasive positive selection across toxin classes

    Darin R. Rokyta;Kenneth P. Wray;Alan R. Lemmon;Emily Moriarty Lemmon

  • GEOLOGICAL AND CLIMATIC FORCES DRIVING SPECIATION IN THE CONTINENTALLY DISTRIBUTED TRILLING CHORUS FROGS (PSEUDACRIS)

    Emily Moriarty Lemmon;Alan R. Lemmon;David C. Cannatella

  • Phylogeny-based delimitation of species boundaries and contact zones in the trilling chorus frogs (Pseudacris).

    Emily Moriarty Lemmon;Alan R. Lemmon;Joseph T. Collins;Joseph T. Collins;Julie A. Lee-Yaw

  • A likelihood framework for estimating phylogeographic history on a continuous landscape.

    Alan R. Lemmon;Alan R. Lemmon;Emily Moriarty Lemmon;Emily Moriarty Lemmon

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan R. Lemmon
Alan R. Lemmon Florida State University
Stephen C. Donnellan
Stephen C. Donnellan South Australian Museum
J. Scott Keogh
J. Scott Keogh Australian National University
R. Alexander Pyron
R. Alexander Pyron George Washington University
Christopher J. Raxworthy
Christopher J. Raxworthy American Museum of Natural History
Robert W. Murphy
Robert W. Murphy University of Toronto
Frank T. Burbrink
Frank T. Burbrink American Museum of Natural History
Charles C. Davis
Charles C. Davis Harvard University
Liang Liu
Liang Liu Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Keith A. Crandall
Keith A. Crandall George Washington University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution can open doors to a variety of career pathways, especially for students interested in healthcare, teaching, or research. Many related fields, such as nursing, offer flexible online degree options for those looking to accelerate their careers or switch professions. For instance, those with a registered nurse license can explore the fastest rn to bsn program to earn a Bachelor of Science in Nursing in as few as six months.

Another pathway includes moving from an Associate Degree in Nursing to becoming a nurse practitioner via specialized adn to np programs. For non-nurses eager to enter healthcare with a focus on science and evolution, direct entry msn programs online provide a streamlined route to a Master of Science in Nursing.

Choosing the right online program is crucial. Comparing schools is key—resources like capella university vs wgu rn to bsn can help you weigh the pros and cons of popular universities. These pathways allow you to build a foundation in science, biology, and healthcare while supporting your long-term career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Emily Moriarty Lemmon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles