World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
82
Citations
23883
World Ranking
16153
National Ranking
297

Niels Andreasen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Niels Andreasen sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 201 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Niels Andreasen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Niels Andreasen sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Niels Andreasen is affiliated with the Karolinska University Hospital in Sweden. Their research profile centers on clinical and medical sciences conducted within a hospital setting.

Although specific details regarding publications, research topics, and fields of study are not available, the affiliation with a major university hospital suggests involvement in applied medical research or clinical practice.

There are no records of recent papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues related to Niels Andreasen, which indicates either a limited public research output or a focus on non-published clinical work.

No book publications or awards have been documented for this scientist.

The absence of listed research fields or main topics of work prevents a detailed description of scientific interests or specialization areas.

Best Publications

  • CSF biomarkers and incipient Alzheimer disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment.

    Niklas Mattsson;Henrik Zetterberg;Oskar Hansson;Niels Andreasen

  • Trial of Solanezumab for Mild Dementia Due to Alzheimer’s Disease

    Lawrence S Honig;Bruno Vellas;Michael M Woodward;Mercè Boada

  • Clinical trials and late-stage drug development for Alzheimer's disease : an appraisal from 1984 to 2014

    Lon S. Schneider;Francesca Mangialasche;Francesca Mangialasche;Niels Andreasen;Niels Andreasen;Howard Feldman

  • Cerebrospinal Fluid β-Amyloid(1-42) in Alzheimer Disease: Differences Between Early- and Late-Onset Alzheimer Disease and Stability During the Course of Disease

    Niels Andreasen;Camilla Hesse;Pia Davidsson;Lennart Minthon

  • Evaluation of CSF-tau and CSF-Abeta42 as diagnostic markers for Alzheimer disease in clinical practice

    Niels Andreasen;Lennart Minthon;Pia Davidsson;Eugeen Vanmechelen

  • Measurement of phosphorylated tau epitopes in the differential diagnosis of Alzheimer disease: a comparative cerebrospinal fluid study.

    Harald Hampel;Katharina Buerger;Raymond Zinkowski;Stefan J. Teipel

  • Quantification of tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 in human cerebrospinal fluid: a sandwich ELISA with a synthetic phosphopeptide for standardization.

    E Vanmechelen;H Vanderstichele;P Davidsson;E Van Kerschaver

  • Transient increase in total tau but not phospho-tau in human cerebrospinal fluid after acute stroke.

    Camilla Hesse;Lars Rosengren;Niels Andreasen;Pia Davidsson

  • Tau and Abeta42 in cerebrospinal fluid from healthy adults 21-93 years of age: establishment of reference values.

    Magnus Sjögren;Hugo Vanderstichele;Hans Ågren;Olof Zachrisson

  • Simultaneous Measurement of β-Amyloid(1–42), Total Tau, and Phosphorylated Tau (Thr181) in Cerebrospinal Fluid by the xMAP Technology

    Annika Olsson;Hugo Vanderstichele;Niels Andreasen;Geert De Meyer

  • Safety and Tolerability of the γ-Secretase Inhibitor Avagacestat in a Phase 2 Study of Mild to Moderate Alzheimer Disease

    Vladimir Coric;Christopher H. van Dyck;Stephen Salloway;Niels Andreasen

  • Neurochemical Aftermath of Amateur Boxing

    Henrik Zetterberg;M. Albert Hietala;Michael Jonsson;Niels Andreasen

  • Value of CSF beta-amyloid1-42 and tau as predictors of Alzheimer's disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment.

    H. Hampel;S. J. Teipel;T. Fuchsberger;N. Andreasen

  • Standardization of measurement of beta-amyloid(1-42) in cerebrospinal fluid and plasma.

    H Vanderstichele;E Van Kerschaver;C Hesse;P Davidsson

  • Safety, tolerability, and antibody response of active Aβ immunotherapy with CAD106 in patients with Alzheimer's disease: randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, first-in-human study

    Bengt Winblad;Niels Andreasen;Lennart Minthon;Annette Floesser

  • Proteomic studies of potential cerebrospinal fluid protein markers for Alzheimer's disease.

    Maja Puchades;Sara Folkesson Hansson;Carol L Nilsson;Niels Andreasen

  • A six‐month double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled study of a transdermal patch in Alzheimer's disease–– rivastigmine patch versus capsule

    Bengt Winblad;Jeffrey Cummings;Niels Andreasen;George Grossberg

  • Differential diagnosis of Alzheimer disease with cerebrospinal fluid levels of tau protein phosphorylated at threonine 231.

    Katharina Buerger;Raymond Zinkowski;Stefan J. Teipel;Tero Tapiola

  • Neurochemical aftermath of amateur boxing

    H. Zetterberg;M. A. Hietala;M. Jonsson;N. Andreasen

  • CSFBiomarkersandIncipientAlzheimerDisease in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment

    Niklas Mattsson;Henrik Zetterberg;Oskar Hansson;Niels Andreasen

Frequent Co-Authors

Kaj Blennow
Kaj Blennow University of Gothenburg
Henrik Zetterberg
Henrik Zetterberg University of Gothenburg
Lennart Minthon
Lennart Minthon Lund University
Bengt Winblad
Bengt Winblad Karolinska Institute
Anders Wallin
Anders Wallin University of Gothenburg
Agneta Nordberg
Agneta Nordberg Karolinska University Hospital
Eugeen Vanmechelen
Eugeen Vanmechelen Fujirebio (Belgium)
Oskar Hansson
Oskar Hansson Lund University
Hugo Vanderstichele
Hugo Vanderstichele Fujirebio (Belgium)
Lars-Olof Wahlund
Lars-Olof Wahlund Karolinska Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re exploring a career in medicine or allied health, a range of online degrees can help fast-track your qualifications and open new opportunities. Many prospective students seek easy dnp programs designed to be flexible and accessible, ideal for working nurses aiming to advance quickly into leadership or specialized clinical roles.

Those wishing to enter the nursing field sooner may be interested in the fastest lpn program, which allows candidates to gain practical nursing skills in less time, supporting the growing demand for licensed practical nurses.

For those drawn to mental health professions, the shortest online pmhnp programs enable registered nurses to specialize as psychiatric-mental health nurse practitioners, often in a year or less.

Not all healthcare careers require direct patient care. With the health administration degree online, students can access affordable options to launch or advance a career in healthcare management, supporting efficient, patient-focused healthcare delivery.

Best Scientists Citing Niels Andreasen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles