World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Lennart Minthon

Lennart Minthon

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 103 7403 6955 148 143 418 36794

Lennart Minthon publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lennart Minthon between 1987 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lennart Minthon published across 35 years, from 1987 to 2021, averaging 12 papers a year. Output peaked at 41 publications in 2012. 4 of the 421 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 41. Peak 41 publications in 2012. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 17 publications 2007: 17 publications 2008: 32 publications 2009: 23 publications 2010: 39 publications 2011: 29 publications 2012: 41 publications 2013: 28 publications 2014: 37 publications 2015: 34 publications 2016: 23 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 2 publications
1987 2021

421 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lennart Minthon: publications per year, 1987 to 2021
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 0
1989 0
1990 3
1991 2
1992 1
1993 3
1994 4
1995 1
1996 2
1997 2
1998 1
1999 3
2000 8
2001 9
2002 3
2003 7
2004 5
2005 9
2006 17
2007 17
2008 32
2009 23
2010 39
2011 29
2012 41
2013 28
2014 37
2015 34
2016 23
2017 16
2018 13
2019 4
2020 2
2021 2
Total 421
Download as CSV

Lennart Minthon publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lennart Minthon sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 401–420 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 418 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918 418
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Lennart Minthon D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lennart Minthon sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 102–103 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 103 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630 103
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Lennart Minthon is affiliated with Lund University in Sweden and focuses primarily on research within the field of Medicine. Their work spans several subfields, including Psychiatry and Mental Health, Physiology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine.

The central topics addressed in their research cover Dementia and Cognitive Impairment, Alzheimer's Disease research and treatments, Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies, Heart Failure Treatment and Management, and cognitive disorders encountered in Intensive Care Units.

Their recent publications include:

  • Mortality in patients with behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia: a registry-based study, 2020, Aging & Mental Health
  • Cognitive test results are associated with mortality and rehospitalization in heart failure: Swedish prospective cohort study, 2020, ESC Heart Failure

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Lennart Minthon include:

  • Katarina Nägga
  • Vanja Bränsvik
  • Eva Granvik
  • Peter Nordström
  • Hannes Holm

The publication venues where their work has appeared include Aging & Mental Health and ESC Heart Failure.

Best Publications

  • Association between CSF biomarkers and incipient Alzheimer's disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a follow-up study

    Oskar Hansson;Oskar Hansson;Henrik Zetterberg;Peder Buchhave;Peder Buchhave;Elisabet Londos;Elisabet Londos

  • CSF biomarkers and incipient Alzheimer disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment.

    Niklas Mattsson;Henrik Zetterberg;Oskar Hansson;Niels Andreasen

  • Classification and prediction of clinical Alzheimer's diagnosis based on plasma signaling proteins

    Sandip Ray;Markus Britschgi;Charles Herbert;Yoshiko Takeda-Uchimura

  • Prevalence and prognostic value of CSF markers of Alzheimer's disease pathology in patients with subjective cognitive impairment or mild cognitive impairment in the DESCRIPA study: a prospective cohort study

    Pieter Jelle Visser;Pieter Jelle Visser;Frans Verhey;Dirk L Knol;Philip Scheltens

  • Cerebrospinal Fluid β-Amyloid(1-42) in Alzheimer Disease: Differences Between Early- and Late-Onset Alzheimer Disease and Stability During the Course of Disease

    Niels Andreasen;Camilla Hesse;Pia Davidsson;Lennart Minthon

  • Evaluation of CSF-tau and CSF-Abeta42 as diagnostic markers for Alzheimer disease in clinical practice

    Niels Andreasen;Lennart Minthon;Pia Davidsson;Eugeen Vanmechelen

  • 18F-flutemetamol amyloid imaging in Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment : a phase 2 trial.

    Rik Vandenberghe;Rik Vandenberghe;Koen Van Laere;Adrian Ivanoiu;Eric Salmon

  • Cerebrospinal Fluid Levels of β-Amyloid 1-42, but Not of Tau, Are Fully Changed Already 5 to 10 Years Before the Onset of Alzheimer Dementia.

    Peder Buchhave;Lennart Minthon;Henrik Zetterberg;Åsa K. Wallin

  • Interleukin-6 Is Elevated in the Cerebrospinal Fluid of Suicide Attempters and Related to Symptom Severity

    Daniel Lindqvist;Shorena Janelidze;Peter Hagell;Sophie Erhardt

  • Memantine in patients with Parkinson's disease dementia or dementia with Lewy bodies: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial

    Dag Aarsland;Dag Aarsland;Clive Ballard;Zuzana Walker;Zuzana Walker;Fredrik Bostrom

  • Diagnosis-Independent Alzheimer Disease Biomarker Signature in Cognitively Normal Elderly People

    Geert De Meyer;Fred Shapiro;Hugo Vanderstichele;Eugeen Vanmechelen

  • Spread of pathological tau proteins through communicating neurons in human Alzheimer's disease

    Jacob W. Vogel;Yasser Iturria-Medina;Olof T. Strandberg;Ruben Smith

  • Accuracy of a Panel of 5 Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers in the Differential Diagnosis of Patients With Dementia and/or Parkinsonian Disorders

    Sara Hall;Annika Öhrfelt;Radu Constantinescu;Ulf Andreasson

  • Donepezil in patients with severe Alzheimer's disease: double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study

    Bengt Winblad;Lena Kilander;Sture Eriksson;Lennart Minthon

  • CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 and Aβ42/Aβ38 ratios: better diagnostic markers of Alzheimer disease

    Shorena Janelidze;Henrik Zetterberg;Niklas Mattsson;Sebastian Palmqvist

  • Plasma tau levels in Alzheimer's disease

    Henrik Zetterberg;Henrik Zetterberg;David Wilson;Ulf Andreasson;Lennart Minthon

  • Detailed comparison of amyloid PET and CSF biomarkers for identifying early Alzheimer disease

    Sebastian Palmqvist;Henrik Zetterberg;Niklas Mattsson;Per Johansson

  • Accuracy of Brain Amyloid Detection in Clinical Practice Using Cerebrospinal Fluid β-Amyloid 42: A Cross-Validation Study Against Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography.

    Sebastian Palmqvist;Henrik Zetterberg;Kaj Blennow;Susanna Vestberg

  • Standardization of measurement of beta-amyloid(1-42) in cerebrospinal fluid and plasma.

    H Vanderstichele;E Van Kerschaver;C Hesse;P Davidsson

  • Safety, tolerability, and antibody response of active Aβ immunotherapy with CAD106 in patients with Alzheimer's disease: randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, first-in-human study

    Bengt Winblad;Niels Andreasen;Lennart Minthon;Annette Floesser

Frequent Co-Authors

Kaj Blennow
Kaj Blennow University of Gothenburg
Henrik Zetterberg
Henrik Zetterberg University of Gothenburg
Oskar Hansson
Oskar Hansson Lund University
Elisabet Londos
Elisabet Londos Lund University
Harald Hampel
Harald Hampel Eisai (United States)
Anders Wallin
Anders Wallin University of Gothenburg
Niels Andreasen
Niels Andreasen Karolinska University Hospital
Pieter Jelle Visser
Pieter Jelle Visser Amsterdam University Medical Centers
Lars-Olof Wahlund
Lars-Olof Wahlund Karolinska Institute
Erik Stomrud
Erik Stomrud Lund University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a medical degree is just one of many routes into the healthcare field. If you’re considering alternative or complementary pathways, several online programs offer flexibility and specialized training.

For those interested in healthcare administration and office work, medical billing and coding schools that accept financial aid provide accessible options to enter the workforce quickly. This career path is ideal for individuals seeking administrative roles without direct patient care responsibilities.

If you’re already a licensed practical nurse and hope to advance, explore lpn to rn programs without teas test. These bridge programs can help you transition smoothly into Registered Nurse roles, often with fewer standardized testing requirements.

Aspiring leaders and managers in healthcare may consider healthcare administration programs for training in management, policy, and operations—a field with diverse career options beyond clinical practice.

Lastly, registered nurses aiming for advanced practice should review adn to fnp programs to earn their master’s degree and qualify as Family Nurse Practitioners. These flexible, online bridge programs can help accelerate your professional growth and open doors to advanced clinical roles.

Best Scientists Citing Lennart Minthon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles