World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Françoise Berger

Françoise Berger

Françoise Berger publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Françoise Berger between 1958 and 2016, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Françoise Berger published across 59 years, from 1958 to 2016, averaging 2.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 1993. 2 of the 156 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1958 to 2016. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 1993. 1958: 1 publication 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 1 publication 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 1 publication 1969: 1 publication 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 2 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 1 publication 1985: 7 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 12 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 1 publication
1958 2016

156 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Françoise Berger: publications per year, 1958 to 2016
Year Publications
1958 1
1959 0
1960 0
1961 1
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 1
1969 1
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 1
1976 0
1977 0
1978 2
1979 1
1980 0
1981 1
1982 2
1983 1
1984 1
1985 7
1986 2
1987 2
1988 4
1989 3
1990 4
1991 5
1992 3
1993 12
1994 9
1995 6
1996 8
1997 6
1998 6
1999 8
2000 2
2001 3
2002 7
2003 0
2004 6
2005 4
2006 5
2007 8
2008 6
2009 0
2010 2
2011 4
2012 3
2013 4
2014 2
2015 1
2016 1
Total 156
Download as CSV

Françoise Berger publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Françoise Berger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Françoise Berger D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Françoise Berger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Françoise Berger is affiliated with the University of Lyon System in France. Their academic profile comprises involvement in a range of research activities and collaborations within the university's framework.

Their record does not presently include recent papers, co-authors, or noted frequent publication venues. There is no specific information about research topics, fields of study, or subfields documented in the available data.

While no individual publications or book contributions are listed, their association with a recognized university indicates engagement in scholarly activities consistent with academic research standards.

There are no recorded awards or distinctions attributed to Françoise Berger at this time, nor information about significant citations or influence metrics associated with their work.

This profile reflects the current state of documented data and does not include speculative content or extrapolations beyond verified details.

Best Publications

  • A clinical evaluation of the International Lymphoma Study Group classification of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

    James O. Armitage

  • The molecular signature of mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma differs from that of other diffuse large B-cell lymphomas and shares features with classical Hodgkin lymphoma

    Kerry J. Savage;Stefano Monti;Jeffery L. Kutok;Giorgio Cattoretti

  • Prognostic Scoring System for Primary CNS Lymphomas: The International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group Experience

    Andrés J M Ferreri;Jean Yves Blay;Michele Reni;Felice Pasini

  • Rituximab plus CHOP (R-CHOP) overcomes bcl-2--associated resistance to chemotherapy in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

    Nicolas Mounier;Josette Briere;Christian Gisselbrecht;Jean-Francois Emile

  • Prognostic Significance of T-Cell Phenotype in Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas

    Christian Gisselbrecht;Philippe Gaulard;Eric Lepage;Bertrand Coiffier

  • The gene expression profile of nodal peripheral T-cell lymphoma demonstrates a molecular link between angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) and follicular helper T (TFH) cells

    Laurence de Leval;David S. Rickman;Caroline Thielen;Aurélien de Reynies

  • Chemotherapy plus involved-field radiation in early-stage Hodgkin's disease

    Christophe Fermé;Houchingue Eghbali;Jacobus H. Meerwaldt;Chantal Rieux

  • Mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue gastrointestinal and nongastrointestinal lymphoma behavior: analysis of 108 patients.

    Catherine Thieblemont;Yves Bastion;Francoise Berger;Claire Rieux

  • Gene expression signatures delineate biological and prognostic subgroups in peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

    Javeed Iqbal;George Wright;Chao Wang;Andreas Rosenwald

  • A multicenter study of treatment of primary CNS lymphoma

    A. J.M. Ferreri;M. Reni;F. Pasini;A. Calderoni

  • Incidence, predictive factors, and outcome of lymphoma transformation in follicular lymphoma patients

    Y Bastion;C Sebban;F Berger;P Felman

  • Molecular signatures to improve diagnosis in peripheral T-cell lymphoma and prognostication in angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma

    Javeed Iqbal;Dennis D. Weisenburger;Timothy C. Greiner;Julie M. Vose

  • Histopathology, cell proliferation indices and clinical outcome in 304 patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL): a clinicopathological study from the European MCL Network.

    Markus Tiemann;Carsten Schrader;Wolfram Klapper;Martin H. Dreyling

  • Primary thyroid lymphoma is a heterogeneous disease.

    C. Thieblemont;A. Mayer;C. Dumontet;Y. Barbier

  • Peripheral T-cell lymphomas have a worse prognosis than B-cell lymphomas: a prospective study of 361 immunophenotyped patients treated with the LNH-84 regimen. The GELA (Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes Agressives).

    B. Coiffier;N. Brousse;M. Peuchmaur;F. Berger

  • Prognostic Value of Ki-67 Index, Cytology, and Growth Pattern in Mantle-Cell Lymphoma: Results From Randomized Trials of the European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Network

    Eva Hoster;Andreas Rosenwald;Françoise Berger;Heinz-Wolfram Bernd

  • Significantly improved PCR-based clonality testing in B-cell malignancies by use of multiple immunoglobulin gene targets: Report of the BIOMED-2 Concerted Action BHM4-CT98-3936

    P. A. S. Evans;Ch Pott;P. J. T. A. Groenen;G. Salles

  • Non-MALT marginal zone B-cell lymphomas: a description of clinical presentation and outcome in 124 patients

    Françoise Berger;Pascale Felman;Catherine Thieblemont;Thierry Pradier

  • Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma: clinical and histological findings from the international peripheral T-cell lymphoma project.

    Jan Delabie;Harald Holte;Julie M. Vose;Fred Ullrich

  • Improved reliability of lymphoma diagnostics via PCR-based clonality testing: report of the BIOMED-2 Concerted Action BHM4-CT98-3936.

    J H J M van Krieken;A W Langerak;E A Macintyre;M Kneba

Frequent Co-Authors

Gilles Salles
Gilles Salles Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Jean-Pierre Magaud
Jean-Pierre Magaud Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Bertrand Coiffier
Bertrand Coiffier Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud
Christian Gisselbrecht
Christian Gisselbrecht Université Paris Cité
James O. Armitage
James O. Armitage University of Nebraska Medical Center
Corinne Haioun
Corinne Haioun Paris-Est Créteil University
Frederic Davi
Frederic Davi Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris
Henri Jacques Delecluse
Henri Jacques Delecluse Grenoble Alpes University
Julie M. Vose
Julie M. Vose University of Nebraska Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens the door to diverse online degrees and career options in healthcare. Many prospective students seek flexible and accelerated academic pathways to enter or advance within the field. Programs such as easy dnp programs are gaining popularity for nurses aspiring to reach the highest levels of clinical leadership while balancing work and personal commitments.

If you are interested in starting your healthcare journey quickly, consider enrolling in fast track lpn programs. These online programs provide a streamlined path into the nursing profession, allowing students to earn qualifications faster than traditional routes. For those holding a master’s degree and seeking to specialize, the shortest post master's pmhnp online programs offer an efficient route to become a psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner.

For individuals interested in organizational or administrative roles, the best online mha programs deliver affordable training in health management and leadership. Each of these online pathways aligns with evolving healthcare demands and provides students with the flexibility needed to advance their careers while managing other priorities.

Best Scientists Citing Françoise Berger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles