World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Françoise Berger

Françoise Berger

Françoise Berger publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Françoise Berger sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Françoise Berger D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Françoise Berger sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Françoise Berger is affiliated with the University of Lyon System in France. Their academic profile comprises involvement in a range of research activities and collaborations within the university's framework.

Their record does not presently include recent papers, co-authors, or noted frequent publication venues. There is no specific information about research topics, fields of study, or subfields documented in the available data.

While no individual publications or book contributions are listed, their association with a recognized university indicates engagement in scholarly activities consistent with academic research standards.

There are no recorded awards or distinctions attributed to Françoise Berger at this time, nor information about significant citations or influence metrics associated with their work.

This profile reflects the current state of documented data and does not include speculative content or extrapolations beyond verified details.

Best Publications

  • A clinical evaluation of the International Lymphoma Study Group classification of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

    James O. Armitage

  • The molecular signature of mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma differs from that of other diffuse large B-cell lymphomas and shares features with classical Hodgkin lymphoma

    Kerry J. Savage;Stefano Monti;Jeffery L. Kutok;Giorgio Cattoretti

  • Prognostic Scoring System for Primary CNS Lymphomas: The International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group Experience

    Andrés J M Ferreri;Jean Yves Blay;Michele Reni;Felice Pasini

  • Rituximab plus CHOP (R-CHOP) overcomes bcl-2--associated resistance to chemotherapy in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

    Nicolas Mounier;Josette Briere;Christian Gisselbrecht;Jean-Francois Emile

  • Prognostic Significance of T-Cell Phenotype in Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas

    Christian Gisselbrecht;Philippe Gaulard;Eric Lepage;Bertrand Coiffier

  • The gene expression profile of nodal peripheral T-cell lymphoma demonstrates a molecular link between angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) and follicular helper T (TFH) cells

    Laurence de Leval;David S. Rickman;Caroline Thielen;Aurélien de Reynies

  • Chemotherapy plus involved-field radiation in early-stage Hodgkin's disease

    Christophe Fermé;Houchingue Eghbali;Jacobus H. Meerwaldt;Chantal Rieux

  • Mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue gastrointestinal and nongastrointestinal lymphoma behavior: analysis of 108 patients.

    Catherine Thieblemont;Yves Bastion;Francoise Berger;Claire Rieux

  • Gene expression signatures delineate biological and prognostic subgroups in peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

    Javeed Iqbal;George Wright;Chao Wang;Andreas Rosenwald

  • A multicenter study of treatment of primary CNS lymphoma

    A. J.M. Ferreri;M. Reni;F. Pasini;A. Calderoni

  • Incidence, predictive factors, and outcome of lymphoma transformation in follicular lymphoma patients

    Y Bastion;C Sebban;F Berger;P Felman

  • Molecular signatures to improve diagnosis in peripheral T-cell lymphoma and prognostication in angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma

    Javeed Iqbal;Dennis D. Weisenburger;Timothy C. Greiner;Julie M. Vose

  • Histopathology, cell proliferation indices and clinical outcome in 304 patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL): a clinicopathological study from the European MCL Network.

    Markus Tiemann;Carsten Schrader;Wolfram Klapper;Martin H. Dreyling

  • Primary thyroid lymphoma is a heterogeneous disease.

    C. Thieblemont;A. Mayer;C. Dumontet;Y. Barbier

  • Peripheral T-cell lymphomas have a worse prognosis than B-cell lymphomas: a prospective study of 361 immunophenotyped patients treated with the LNH-84 regimen. The GELA (Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes Agressives).

    B. Coiffier;N. Brousse;M. Peuchmaur;F. Berger

  • Prognostic Value of Ki-67 Index, Cytology, and Growth Pattern in Mantle-Cell Lymphoma: Results From Randomized Trials of the European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Network

    Eva Hoster;Andreas Rosenwald;Françoise Berger;Heinz-Wolfram Bernd

  • Significantly improved PCR-based clonality testing in B-cell malignancies by use of multiple immunoglobulin gene targets: Report of the BIOMED-2 Concerted Action BHM4-CT98-3936

    P. A. S. Evans;Ch Pott;P. J. T. A. Groenen;G. Salles

  • Non-MALT marginal zone B-cell lymphomas: a description of clinical presentation and outcome in 124 patients

    Françoise Berger;Pascale Felman;Catherine Thieblemont;Thierry Pradier

  • Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma: clinical and histological findings from the international peripheral T-cell lymphoma project.

    Jan Delabie;Harald Holte;Julie M. Vose;Fred Ullrich

  • Improved reliability of lymphoma diagnostics via PCR-based clonality testing: report of the BIOMED-2 Concerted Action BHM4-CT98-3936.

    J H J M van Krieken;A W Langerak;E A Macintyre;M Kneba

Frequent Co-Authors

Gilles Salles
Gilles Salles Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Jean-Pierre Magaud
Jean-Pierre Magaud Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Bertrand Coiffier
Bertrand Coiffier Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud
Christian Gisselbrecht
Christian Gisselbrecht Université Paris Cité
James O. Armitage
James O. Armitage University of Nebraska Medical Center
Corinne Haioun
Corinne Haioun Paris-Est Créteil University
Frederic Davi
Frederic Davi Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris
Henri Jacques Delecluse
Henri Jacques Delecluse Grenoble Alpes University
Julie M. Vose
Julie M. Vose University of Nebraska Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens the door to diverse online degrees and career options in healthcare. Many prospective students seek flexible and accelerated academic pathways to enter or advance within the field. Programs such as easy dnp programs are gaining popularity for nurses aspiring to reach the highest levels of clinical leadership while balancing work and personal commitments.

If you are interested in starting your healthcare journey quickly, consider enrolling in fast track lpn programs. These online programs provide a streamlined path into the nursing profession, allowing students to earn qualifications faster than traditional routes. For those holding a master’s degree and seeking to specialize, the shortest post master's pmhnp online programs offer an efficient route to become a psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner.

For individuals interested in organizational or administrative roles, the best online mha programs deliver affordable training in health management and leadership. Each of these online pathways aligns with evolving healthcare demands and provides students with the flexibility needed to advance their careers while managing other priorities.

Best Scientists Citing Françoise Berger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles