World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
68
Citations
16969
World Ranking
7774
National Ranking
13

Kostas Stamatopoulos publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kostas Stamatopoulos sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 500 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Kostas Stamatopoulos D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kostas Stamatopoulos sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kostas Stamatopoulos is affiliated with the Centre for Research and Technology Hellas in Greece. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with significant contributions to subfields such as Genetics, Immunology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology, and Molecular Biology.

The scientist's work centers extensively on topics including Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research, Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment, Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders, Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research, CAR-T cell therapy research, Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics, and Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research.

Recent publications by Kostas Stamatopoulos include:

  • Marginal zone lymphomas: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up (2020, Annals of Oncology)
  • COVID-19 severity and mortality in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a joint study by ERIC, the European Research Initiative on CLL, and CLL Campus (2020, Leukemia)
  • Higher-order connections between stereotyped subsets: implications for improved patient classification in CLL (2020, Blood)
  • IGLV3-21 * 01 is an inherited risk factor for CLL through the acquisition of a single-point mutation enabling autonomous BCR signaling (2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • Immunoglobulin gene sequence analysis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: the 2022 update of the recommendations by ERIC, the European Research Initiative on CLL (2022, Leukemia)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Kostas Stamatopoulos include Paolo Ghia, Anastasia Chatzidimitriou, Lydia Scarfò, Richard Rosenquist, and Andreas Agathangelidis.

Their scientific output appears in several key publication venues, notably:

  • Blood
  • HemaSphere
  • Leukemia
  • Haematologica
  • Frontiers in Oncology

Best Publications

  • Non-coding recurrent mutations in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia

    Xose S. Puente;Silvia Beà;Rafael Valdés-Mas;Neus Villamor

  • Over 20% of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia carry stereotyped receptors: pathogenetic implications and clinical correlations

    Kostas Stamatopoulos;Chrysoula Belessi;Carol Moreno;Myriam Boudjograh

  • Stereotyped B-cell receptors in one-third of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a molecular classification with implications for targeted therapies

    Andreas Agathangelidis;Nikos Darzentas;Anastasia Hadzidimitriou;Xavier Brochet

  • Human memory B cells originate from three distinct germinal center-dependent and -independent maturation pathways.

    Magdalena A. Berkowska;Gertjan J. A. Driessen;Vasilis Bikos;Christina Grosserichter-Wagener

  • The genetics of Richter syndrome reveals disease heterogeneity and predicts survival after transformation

    Davide Rossi;Valeria Spina;Clara Deambrogi;Silvia Rasi

  • Stereotyped patterns of somatic hypermutation in subsets of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: implications for the role of antigen selection in leukemogenesis

    Fiona Murray;Nikos Darzentas;Anastasia Hadzidimitriou;Gerard Tobin

  • Recurrent mutations refine prognosis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

    P Baliakas;A Hadzidimitriou;L-A Sutton;D Rossi

  • Splenic marginal zone lymphoma proposals for a revision of diagnostic, staging and therapeutic criteria

    E Matutes;D Oscier;C Montalban;F Berger

  • ERIC recommendations on IGHV gene mutational status analysis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

    Paolo Ghia;K. Stamatopoulos;C. Belessi;C. Moreno

  • Two main genetic pathways lead to the transformation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia to Richter syndrome

    Ekaterina Chigrinova;Andrea Rinaldi;Ivo Kwee;Ivo Kwee;Davide Rossi

  • COVID-19 severity and mortality in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a joint study by ERIC, the European Research Initiative on CLL, and CLL Campus.

    Lydia Scarfò;Thomas Chatzikonstantinou;Gian Matteo Rigolin;Giulia Quaresmini

  • Geographic patterns and pathogenetic implications of IGHV gene usage in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: the lesson of the IGHV3-21 gene

    Paolo Ghia;Kostas Stamatopoulos;Chrysoula Belessi;Carol Moreno

  • Molecular Subsets of Mantle Cell Lymphoma Defined by the IGHV Mutational Status and SOX11 Expression Have Distinct Biologic and Clinical Features

    Alba Navarro;Guillem Clot;Cristina Royo;Pedro Jares

  • Standardized next-generation sequencing of immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene recombinations for MRD marker identification in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia; a EuroClonality-NGS validation study

    Monika Brüggemann;Michaela Kotrová;Henrik Knecht;Jack Bartram

  • Cytogenetic complexity in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: definitions, associations, and clinical impact

    Panagiotis Baliakas;Sabine Jeromin;Michalis Iskas;Anna Puiggros

  • Cytogenetic aberrations and their prognostic value in a series of 330 splenic marginal zone B-cell lymphomas: a multicenter study of the Splenic B-Cell Lymphoma Group.

    Marta Salido;Cristina Baró;David Oscier;Kostas Stamatopoulos

  • Microenvironmental influences in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: the role of antigen stimulation.

    P. Ghia;N. Chiorazzi;N. Chiorazzi;N. Chiorazzi;K. Stamatopoulos

  • Is there a role for antigen selection in mantle cell lymphoma? Immunogenetic support from a series of 807 cases.

    Anastasia Hadzidimitriou;Andreas Agathangelidis;Nikos Darzentas;Fiona Murray

  • ERIC recommendations for TP53 mutation analysis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia-update on methodological approaches and results interpretation

    J. Malcikova;J. Malcikova;E. Tausch;D. Rossi;Lesley Ann Sutton;Lesley Ann Sutton

  • Immunogenetics shows that not all MBL are equal: the larger the clone the more similar to CLL

    Anna Vardi;Antonis Dagklis;Lydia Scarfò;Diane Jelinek

Frequent Co-Authors

Paolo Ghia
Paolo Ghia Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Richard Rosenquist
Richard Rosenquist Karolinska Institute
Frederic Davi
Frederic Davi Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris
Šárka Pospíšilová
Šárka Pospíšilová Masaryk University
David Oscier
David Oscier Royal Bournemouth Hospital
Nicholas Chiorazzi
Nicholas Chiorazzi Feinstein Institute for Medical Research
Anton W. Langerak
Anton W. Langerak Erasmus University Rotterdam
Davide Rossi
Davide Rossi European Society for Medical Oncology
Elias Campo
Elias Campo University of Barcelona
Gianluca Gaidano
Gianluca Gaidano University of Eastern Piedmont Amadeo Avogadro

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA can open many exciting doors, especially in health, wellness, and medical fields. If you're looking to expand your expertise or specialize further, consider exploring related online degrees that fit various career goals.

For students interested in human movement and health, pursuing an online kinesiology bachelor's degree can lead to rewarding careers in physical therapy, sports science, or rehabilitation. Those seeking to make an impact in mental health nursing may want to consider a 1 year pmhnp program, offering a fast track into psychiatric and mental health nurse practitioner roles.

If you already hold an advanced degree in nursing, a post masters fnp programs can help you transition to a family nurse practitioner career, expanding your scope of practice. Nutrition is another growing field; earning an online nutritionist degree allows you to support individual and community health through dietary expertise.

These online pathways provide flexibility and specialized training, helping you adapt to evolving industry demands while advancing your professional journey.

Best Scientists Citing Kostas Stamatopoulos

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles