World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
France
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
54
Citations
12983
World Ranking
4526
National Ranking
88

Claude Castelluccia publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claude Castelluccia sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 194 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Claude Castelluccia D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claude Castelluccia sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in France Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in France Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in France Leader Award

Overview

Claude Castelluccia is affiliated with the French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation (INRIA) in France. Their research primarily addresses topics within Computer Science, with a notable focus on Artificial Intelligence.

Their work spans several subfields, including:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Information Systems
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Safety Research

Main research topics covered by their publications include:

  • Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Cryptography and Data Security
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
  • User Authentication and Security Systems

Claude Castelluccia has authored several papers, some of the recent ones are:

  • DESIRE: A Third Way for a European Exposure Notification System Leveraging the best of centralized and decentralized systems, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Towards a Governance Framework for Brain Data, 2022, Neuroethics
  • Taking Advice from (Dis)Similar Machines: The Impact of Human-Machine Similarity on Machine-Assisted Decision-Making, 2022, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing
  • Constrained Differentially Private Federated Learning for Low-bandwidth Devices, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Federated Learning in Adversarial Settings, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)

The most frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Neuroethics
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing
  • Digital Threats Research and Practice

They have collaborated frequently with several researchers, among them:

  • Daniel Le Métayer
  • Théodore Christakis
  • Karine Bannelier
  • Raouf Kerkouche
  • Gergely Ács

Best Publications

  • Differentiation mechanisms for IEEE 802.11

    I. Aad;C. Castelluccia

  • Efficient and provably secure aggregation of encrypted data in wireless sensor networks

    Claude Castelluccia;Aldar C-F. Chan;Einar Mykletun;Gene Tsudik

  • Efficient aggregation of encrypted data in wireless sensor networks

    C. Castelluccia;E. Mykletun;G. Tsudik

  • Extending SAT Solvers to Cryptographic Problems

    Mate Soos;Karsten Nohl;Claude Castelluccia

  • I have a DREAM!: differentially private smart metering

    Gergely Ács;Claude Castelluccia

  • Code injection attacks on harvard-architecture devices

    Aurélien Francillon;Claude Castelluccia

  • Differentially private sequential data publication via variable-length n-grams

    Rui Chen;Gergely Acs;Claude Castelluccia

  • Proximity-based access control for implantable medical devices

    Kasper Bonne Rasmussen;Claude Castelluccia;Thomas S. Heydt-Benjamin;Srdjan Capkun

  • Hierarchical MIPv6 mobility management

    Hesham Soliman;Ludovic Bellier;Claude Castelluccia;Karim Malki

  • On the difficulty of software-based attestation of embedded devices

    Claude Castelluccia;Aurélien Francillon;Daniele Perito;Claudio Soriente

  • Statistically Unique and Cryptographically Verifiable (SUCV) Identifiers and Addresses.

    Gabriel Montenegro;Claude Castelluccia

  • Adaptive Password-Strength Meters from Markov Models

    Claude Castelluccia;Durmuth Markus;Daniele Perito

  • How unique and traceable are usernames

    Daniele Perito;Claude Castelluccia;Mohamed Ali Kaafar;Pere Manils

  • HMIPv6: A hierarchical mobile IPv6 proposal

    Claude Castelluccia

  • Differentially Private Histogram Publishing through Lossy Compression

    Gergely Acs;Claude Castelluccia;Rui Chen

  • Shake them up!: a movement-based pairing protocol for CPU-constrained devices

    Claude Castelluccia;Pars Mutaf

  • Secret Handshakes from CA-Oblivious Encryption

    Claude Castelluccia;Claude Castelluccia;Stanisław Jarecki;Gene Tsudik

  • EphPub: Toward robust Ephemeral Publishing

    Claude Castelluccia;Emiliano De Cristofaro;Aurelien Francillon;Mohamed-Ali Kaafar

  • Selling Off Privacy at Auction

    Lukasz Olejnik;Tran Minh-Dung;Claude Castelluccia

  • OMEN: Faster Password Guessing Using an Ordered Markov Enumerator

    Markus Dürmuth;Fabian Angelstorf;Claude Castelluccia;Daniele Perito

  • Flexible network support for mobility

    Xinhua Zhao;Claude Castelluccia;Mary Baker

Frequent Co-Authors

Gene Tsudik
Gene Tsudik University of California, Irvine
Mohamed Ali Kaafar
Mohamed Ali Kaafar Macquarie University
Emiliano De Cristofaro
Emiliano De Cristofaro University of California, Riverside
Stanislaw Jarecki
Stanislaw Jarecki University of California, Irvine
Christof Paar
Christof Paar Max Planck Institute for Security and Privacy
Srdjan Capkun
Srdjan Capkun ETH Zurich
Hannes Hartenstein
Hannes Hartenstein Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Claudia Diaz
Claudia Diaz KU Leuven
Nitesh Saxena
Nitesh Saxena Texas A&M University
Mary Baker
Mary Baker Hewlett-Packard (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring options in computer science goes beyond traditional degrees. Many students today are considering quick degrees that pay well, which can help you enter the tech job market faster without compromising on salary opportunities.

If you’re interested in advanced technology, you might look into the best online masters in artificial intelligence. These specialized programs are offered at an increasing number of U.S. universities, providing flexible study options and up-to-date skills highly valued by employers.

Choosing the best degree for your goals is crucial. Factors to consider include your career aspirations, required time investment, and the types of roles that interest you. Computer science remains one of the top choices due to its versatility and high earning potential.

For those looking to elevate their credentials quickly, an easy online masters degree might be the right pathway. These programs are designed to be more accessible while still providing meaningful knowledge that can help advance your career.

Best Scientists Citing Claude Castelluccia

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles