World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
44
Citations
11583
World Ranking
7426
National Ranking
3237

Stanislaw Jarecki publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stanislaw Jarecki sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 103 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Stanislaw Jarecki D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stanislaw Jarecki sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stanislaw Jarecki is affiliated with the University of California, Irvine in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on computer science, with an emphasis on cryptography, data security, and authentication protocols.

Their recent scholarly contributions include studies published in a variety of academic venues. Notable publications are:

  • Two-factor Password-authenticated Key Exchange with End-to-end Security, 2021, ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security
  • The Art of Change Management - How To Deal with the Incentive Effect in Turbulent Times, 2023, European State Aid Law Quarterly
  • Special Issue on 13th International Conference on Security and Cryptography for Networks (SCN 2022), 2024, Information and Computation
  • Building and Testing a Hidden-Password Online Password Manager, 2025, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Hugo Krawczyk
  • Jiayu Xu
  • Yanqi Gu
  • Manuel Barbosa
  • Bruno Freitas Dos Santos

Jarecki's work appears in several key publication venues such as:

  • ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security
  • European State Aid Law Quarterly
  • Information and Computation
  • IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security

They have contributed to book publications through Springer Science+Business Media, with titles including Topics in Cryptology - CT-RSA 2020 (2020) and Security and Cryptography for Networks (2022).

Their research spans main fields and subfields including artificial intelligence, computer networks and communications, information systems, signal processing, and computer vision and pattern recognition.

Key topics addressed in their publications focus on:

  • Cryptography and Data Security
  • Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
  • User Authentication and Security Systems
  • Cryptographic Implementations and Security
  • Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
  • Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Biometric Identification and Security

Best Publications

  • Proactive Secret Sharing Or: How to Cope With Perpetual Leakage

    Amir Herzberg;Stanislaw Jarecki;Stanislaw Jarecki;Hugo Krawczyk;Moti Yung

  • Highly-Scalable Searchable Symmetric Encryption with Support for Boolean Queries

    David Cash;Stanislaw Jarecki;Charanjit S. Jutla;Hugo Krawczyk

  • Dynamic Searchable Encryption in Very-Large Databases: Data Structures and Implementation.

    David Cash;Joseph Jaeger;Stanislaw Jarecki;Charanjit S. Jutla

  • Secure distributed key generation for discrete-log based cryptosystems

    Rosario Gennaro;Stanisław Jarecki;Hugo Krawczyk;Tal Rabin

  • Robust threshold DSS signatures

    Rosario Gennaro;Stanisław Jarecki;Hugo Krawczyk;Tal Rabin

  • Secure Distributed Key Generation for Discrete-Log Based Cryptosystems

    Rosario Gennaro;Stanislaw Jarecki;Hugo Krawczyk;Tal Rabin

  • Proactive public key and signature systems

    Amir Herzberg;Markus Jakobsson;Stanislław Jarecki;Hugo Krawczyk

  • Efficient Oblivious Pseudorandom Function with Applications to Adaptive OT and Secure Computation of Set Intersection

    Stanisław Jarecki;Xiaomin Liu

  • Robust and Efficient Sharing of RSA Functions

    Rosario Gennaro;Stanislaw Jarecki;Hugo Krawczyk;Tal Rabin

  • Adaptive security for threshold cryptosystems

    R. Canetti;R. Gennaro;S. Jarecki;H. Krawczyk

  • Outsourced Symmetric Private Information Retrieval.

    Stanislaw Jarecki;Charanjit S. Jutla;Hugo Krawczyk;Marcel-Catalin Rosu

  • Rich Queries on Encrypted Data: Beyond Exact Matches.

    Sky Faber;Stanislaw Jarecki;Hugo Krawczyk;Quan Nguyen

  • Fast secure computation of set intersection

    Stanisław Jarecki;Xiaomin Liu

  • OPAQUE: An Asymmetric PAKE Protocol Secure Against Pre-Computation Attacks.

    Stanislaw Jarecki;Hugo Krawczyk;Jiayu Xu

  • Public Key Cryptography - PKC 2009

    Stanisław Jarecki;Gene Tsudik

  • Robust and Efficient Sharing of RSA Functions

    Unknown

  • Efficient Two-Party Secure Computation on Committed Inputs

    Stanisław Jarecki;Vitaly Shmatikov

  • Adaptively secure threshold cryptography: introducing concurrency, removing erasures

    Stanisław Jarecki;Anna Lysyanskaya

  • A signature scheme as secure as the Diffie-Hellman problem

    Eu-Jin Goh;Stanislaw Jarecki

  • Robust Threshold DSS Signatures

    Rosario Gennaro;Stanisław Jarecki;Hugo Krawczyk;Tal Rabin

  • Secret Handshakes from CA-Oblivious Encryption

    Claude Castelluccia;Claude Castelluccia;Stanisław Jarecki;Gene Tsudik

Frequent Co-Authors

Hugo Krawczyk
Hugo Krawczyk Amazon (United States)
Gene Tsudik
Gene Tsudik University of California, Irvine
Nitesh Saxena
Nitesh Saxena Texas A&M University
Rosario Gennaro
Rosario Gennaro City College of New York
Michael Steiner
Michael Steiner Intel (United States)
Claude Castelluccia
Claude Castelluccia French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Tal Rabin
Tal Rabin University of Pennsylvania
Vitaly Shmatikov
Vitaly Shmatikov Cornell University
Charanjit S. Jutla
Charanjit S. Jutla IBM (United States)
Aggelos Kiayias
Aggelos Kiayias University of Edinburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring an online degree opens up many options for students interested in Computer Science and technology careers. Many students look for easy online degrees that pay well, aiming for a balance between short graduation times and high earning potential. Programs in information systems, cybersecurity, and software development often make this list, letting graduates enter the workforce quickly and earn competitive salaries.

Artificial Intelligence is another growing field, and students can now find an ai degree online from accredited institutions. These degrees provide hands-on skills and foundational knowledge for roles in AI development, machine learning, and data analysis.

When searching for the best degree to get, it's important to consider your career goals, desired salary, and industry demand. Computer Science remains one of the most versatile and sought-after majors, opening doors in technology, finance, healthcare, and more.

If your goal is to upskill quickly, check out the easiest online masters programs. These options let working professionals boost their credentials and job prospects with flexible coursework that can be completed remotely.

Best Scientists Citing Stanislaw Jarecki

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles