World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
46
Citations
9501
World Ranking
4609
National Ranking
1602

Thomas R. Crow publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas R. Crow sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 100 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Thomas R. Crow D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas R. Crow sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas R. Crow is affiliated with the US Forest Service in the United States. Their recent research contributions focus on the intersection of art, politics, and modernism with a specific emphasis on visual arts and performing arts.

Their recent papers include:

  • A propos de Theodore Roszak et de la contre-culture à venir, 2022, published in Critique d'art
  • On Theodore Roszak and the Counterculture to Come, 2022, published in Critique d'art

These papers were both published in the venue Critique d'art, where they have contributed multiple works, reflecting a continuing engagement with the publication.

Thomas R. Crow has also published books through Princeton University Press. Notably, the book titled The Artist in the Counterculture appeared in two editions or printings, one in 2022 and another in 2023, accumulating citations over time.

Their main area of study includes the broader topic of Art, Politics, and Modernism, while their subfield reflects a focus on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, indicating an interdisciplinary approach within the arts and humanities.

  • Art, Politics, and Modernism

  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts

They have not been recorded to have frequent co-authors, which may suggest independent research or collaboration with a broader, less repetitive network of scholars.

Best Publications

  • Microclimate in Forest Ecosystem and Landscape Ecology

    Jiquan Chen;Sari C. Saunders;Thomas R. Crow;Robert J. Naiman

  • Estimating aboveground biomass using Landsat 7 ETM+ data across a managed landscape in northern Wisconsin, USA

    Daolan Zheng;John Rademacher;Jiquan Chen;Thomas Crow

  • Comparing Spatial Pattern in Unaltered Old-Growth and Disturbed Forest Landscapes.

    David J. Mladenoff;Mark A. White;John Pastor;Thomas R. Crow

  • Reproductive mode and mechanisms for self-replacement of northern red oak (Quercus rubra): a review

    T. R. Crow

  • Improved forest classification in the northern Lake States using multi-temporal Landsat imagery

    Peter T. Wolter;David J. Mladenoff;George E. Host;Thomas R. Crow

  • Homogenization of northern U.S. Great Lakes forests due to land use

    Lisa A. Schulte;David J. Mladenoff;Thomas R. Crow;Laura C. Merrick

  • Effects of Management on the Composition and Structure of Northern Hardwood Forests in Upper Michigan

    Thomas R. Crow;David S. Buckley;Elizabeth A. Nauertz;John C. Zasada

  • Influence of skid trails and haul roads on understory plant richness and composition in managed forest landscapes in Upper Michigan, USA

    David S Buckley;Thomas R Crow;Elizabeth A Nauertz;Kurt E Schulz

  • A rainforest chronicle: a 30-year record of change in structure and composition at El Verde, Puerto Rico.

    Unknown

  • Understory vegetation and site factors: implications for a managed Wisconsin landscape

    K.D. Brosofske;J. Chen;Thomas R. Crow

  • Linking an ecosystem model and a landscape model to study forest species response to climate warming

    Hong S. He;David J. Mladenoff;Thomas R. Crow

  • A Quantitative Approach to Developing Regional Ecosystem Classifications

    George E. Host;Philip L. Polzer;David J. Mladenoff;Mark A. White

  • Characterizing historical and modern fire regimes in Michigan (USA): A landscape ecosystem approach

    David T. Cleland;Thomas R. Crow;Sari C. Saunders;Donald I. Dickmann

  • ECOPHYS: An ecophysiological growth process model for juvenile poplar.

    H. M. Rauscher;J. G. Isebrands;G. E. Host;R. E. Dickson

  • Age-dependent changes in ecosystem carbon fluxes in managed forests in Northern Wisconsin, USA

    Asko Noormets;Asko Noormets;Jiquan Chen;Thomas R. Crow

  • Simulating the Effects of Alternative Forest Management Strategies on Landscape Structure

    Eric J. Gustafson;Thomas R. Crow

  • INTEGRATION OF GIS DATA AND CLASSIFIED SATELLITE IMAGERY FOR REGIONAL FOREST ASSESSMENT

    Hong S. He;David J. Mladenoff;Volker C. Radeloff;Thomas R. Crow

  • Effects of harvesting and deer browsing on attributes of understory plants in northern hardwood forests, Upper Michigan, USA

    Lidia Szabo Kraft;Thomas R. Crow;David S. Buckley;Elizabeth A. Nauertz

  • Modeling the effects of forest harvesting on landscape structure and the spatial distribution of cowbird brood parasitism

    Eric J. Gustafson;Thomas R. Crow

  • NITROGEN STORAGE AND CYCLING IN OLD- AND SECOND-GROWTH NORTHERN HARDWOOD FORESTS

    Melany C. Fisk;Donald R. Zak;Thomas R. Crow

  • Effects of Management on the Composition and Structure of Northern

    Thomas R. Crow;David S. Buckley;Elizabeth A. Nauertz;John C. Zasada

Frequent Co-Authors

Jiquan Chen
Jiquan Chen Michigan State University
David J. Mladenoff
David J. Mladenoff University of Wisconsin–Madison
Eric J. Gustafson
Eric J. Gustafson US Forest Service
Hong S. He
Hong S. He University of Missouri
George E. Host
George E. Host University of Minnesota, Duluth
Asko Noormets
Asko Noormets Texas A&M University
Lisa A. Schulte
Lisa A. Schulte Iowa State University
Stephen R. Shifley
Stephen R. Shifley United States Department of Agriculture
Donald I. Dickmann
Donald I. Dickmann Michigan State University
David F. Grigal
David F. Grigal University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution opens doors to a range of online degrees and diverse career paths. Many students find that pairing their major with skills from related fields gives them an edge. For those interested in quantitative research and data analysis, a bsc mathematics online can offer vital math foundations for ecological modeling or evolutionary theory.

Creative skills are also in demand—communicating science visually is key for public outreach and education. Programs like online graphic design schools help students craft engaging infographics, field guides, and scientific presentations.

If you seek flexibility, many choose from the most affordable online interdisciplinary studies programs to tailor their learning. These allow you to combine courses in ecology, policy, communication, or technology based on your desired career.

For those wanting to deepen their expertise, an online masters in history provides strong context for evolutionary studies, conservation policy, and environmental ethics—helpful for research or museum careers.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas R. Crow

Trending Scientists