World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 48 15279 13772 3872 3175 151 7929

Ali A. Rownaghi publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ali A. Rownaghi between 2007 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ali A. Rownaghi published across 20 years, from 2007 to 2026, averaging 8.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2020. 17 of the 163 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2020. 2007: 2 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 23 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 15 publications 2026: 2 publications
2007 2026

163 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ali A. Rownaghi: publications per year, 2007 to 2026
Year Publications
2007 2
2008 0
2009 4
2010 3
2011 4
2012 5
2013 5
2014 0
2015 4
2016 7
2017 13
2018 13
2019 7
2020 23
2021 19
2022 11
2023 9
2024 17
2025 15
2026 2
Total 163
Download as CSV

Ali A. Rownaghi publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ali A. Rownaghi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 151 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218 151
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Ali A. Rownaghi D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ali A. Rownaghi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835 48
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ali A. Rownaghi is affiliated with Missouri University of Science and Technology in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines within materials science, engineering, and chemistry, focusing extensively on catalytic processes and material synthesis technologies.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Materials Science
  • Engineering
  • Chemistry

They have contributed significantly to several subfields, particularly:

  • Materials Chemistry
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Inorganic Chemistry
  • Catalysis
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Their published research covers a variety of topics, including:

  • Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
  • Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
  • Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions
  • Covalent Organic Framework Applications
  • Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
  • Membrane Separation and Gas Transport

Ali A. Rownaghi's recent scientific papers include:

  • Recent Advances in 3D Printing of Structured Materials for Adsorption and Catalysis Applications, 2021, Chemical Reviews
  • Oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane to ethylene in an integrated CO2 capture-utilization process, 2020, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental
  • The effects of cell density and intrinsic porosity on structural properties and adsorption kinetics in 3D-printed zeolite monoliths, 2020, Chemical Engineering Science
  • Gel-Print-Grow: A New Way of 3D Printing Metal-Organic Frameworks, 2020, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
  • Adsorption of iodine from aqueous solutions by aminosilane-grafted mesoporous alumina, 2021, Chemical Engineering Journal

They have frequently collaborated with several researchers, including:

  • Fateme Rezaei
  • Shane Lawson
  • Kyle Newport
  • Khaled Baamran
  • Peter O. Aina

Their research work has been published prominently in the following venues:

  • Chemical Engineering Journal
  • Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
  • Energy & Fuels
  • ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
  • ACS Applied Bio Materials

Best Publications

  • Carbon Capture and Utilization Update

    Ahmed Al-Mamoori;Anirudh Krishnamurthy;Ali A. Rownaghi;Fateme Rezaei

  • Oxidative dehydrogenation of propane to propylene with carbon dioxide

    Marktus A. Atanga;Fateme Rezaei;Abbas Jawad;Mark W. Fitch

  • SOx/NOx Removal from Flue Gas Streams by Solid Adsorbents: A Review of Current Challenges and Future Directions

    Fateme Rezaei;Ali A. Rownaghi;Saman Monjezi;Ryan P. Lively

  • Recent Advances in 3D Printing of Structured Materials for Adsorption and Catalysis Applications.

    Shane Lawson;Xin Li;Harshul Thakkar;Ali A Rownaghi

  • 3D-Printed Metal–Organic Framework Monoliths for Gas Adsorption Processes

    Harshul V. Thakkar;Stephen Eastman;Qasim Al-Naddaf;Ali A. Rownaghi

  • 3D-Printed Zeolite Monoliths for CO2 Removal from Enclosed Environments

    Harshul V. Thakkar;Stephen Eastman;Amit Narendrasing Hajari;Ali A. Rownaghi

  • Methanol to Gasoline-Range Hydrocarbons: Influence of Nanocrystal Size and Mesoporosity on Catalytic Performance and Product Distribution of ZSM-5

    Ali A. Rownaghi;Jonas Hedlund

  • ZIF-8 Membranes via Interfacial Microfluidic Processing in Polymeric Hollow Fibers: Efficient Propylene Separation at Elevated Pressures

    Kiwon Eum;Chen Ma;Chen Ma;Ali A. Rownaghi;Christopher W. Jones

  • Recent Advances in Development of Amine Functionalized Adsorbents for CO₂ Capture

    Teresa Gelles;Shane Lawson;Ali A. Rownaghi;Fateme Rezaei

  • MOF-74 and UTSA-16 film growth on monolithic structures and their CO2 adsorption performance

    Fateme Rezaei;Shane M. Lawson;Hooman Hosseini;Harshul V. Thakkar

  • Selective dehydration of methanol to dimethyl ether on ZSM-5 nanocrystals

    Ali A. Rownaghi;Fateme Rezaei;Matteo Stante;Jonas Hedlund

  • Formulation of Aminosilica Adsorbents into 3D-Printed Monoliths and Evaluation of Their CO2 Capture Performance.

    Harshul V. Thakkar;Stephen Eastman;Ahmed Al-Mamoori;Amit Narendrasing Hajari

  • Uniform mesoporous ZSM-5 single crystals catalyst with high resistance to coke formation for methanol deoxygenation

    Ali A. Rownaghi;Fateme Rezaei;Jonas Hedlund

  • Fluidic Processing of High-Performance ZIF-8 Membranes on Polymeric Hollow Fibers: Mechanistic Insights and Microstructure Control

    Kiwon Eum;Ali A. Rownaghi;Ali A. Rownaghi;Dalsu Choi;Ramesh R. Bhave

  • Development of 3D-Printed Polymer-Zeolite Composite Monoliths for Gas Separation

    Harshul V. Thakkar;Shane M. Lawson;Ali A. Rownaghi;Fateme Rezaei

  • Yield of gasoline-range hydrocarbons as a function of uniform ZSM-5 crystal size

    Ali A. Rownaghi;Fateme Rezaei;Jonas Hedlund

  • Development of bismuth-mordenite adsorbents for iodine capture from off-gas streams

    Ahmed Al-Mamoori;Mansour Alsalbokh;Shane Lawson;Ali A. Rownaghi

  • Catalytic cracking of n-hexane for producing light olefins on 3D-printed monoliths of MFI and FAU zeolites

    Xin Li;Wenbin Li;Fateme Rezaei;Ali A. Rownaghi

  • Combined Capture and Utilization of CO2 for Syngas Production over Dual-Function Materials

    Ahmed Al-Mamoori;Ali A. Rownaghi;Fateme Rezaei

  • Selective formation of light olefin by n-hexane cracking over HZSM-5: Influence of crystal size and acid sites of nano- and micrometer-sized crystals

    Ali A. Rownaghi;Fateme Rezaei;Jonas Hedlund

  • UTSA-16 Growth within 3D-Printed Co-Kaolin Monoliths with High Selectivity for CO2/CH4, CO2/N2, and CO2/H2 Separation

    Shane M. Lawson;Qasim Al-Naddaf;Anirudh Krishnamurthy;Marc St. Amour

Frequent Co-Authors

Fateme Rezaei
Fateme Rezaei University of Miami
Jonas Hedlund
Jonas Hedlund Luleå University of Technology
Christopher W. Jones
Christopher W. Jones Georgia Institute of Technology
Sankar Nair
Sankar Nair Georgia Institute of Technology
Yun Hin Taufiq-Yap
Yun Hin Taufiq-Yap Universiti Putra Malaysia
William J. Koros
William J. Koros Georgia Institute of Technology
Ryan P. Lively
Ryan P. Lively Georgia Institute of Technology
Daniel E. Resasco
Daniel E. Resasco University of Oklahoma
Hongyan Ma
Hongyan Ma Missouri University of Science and Technology
Aditya Kumar
Aditya Kumar Missouri University of Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying chemistry in the USA offers a versatile foundation for various career paths. Many graduates explore specialized fields such as forensic science, where a deep understanding of chemical analysis plays a crucial role in solving crimes. For those interested, it’s helpful to research forensic career paths to understand the potential roles and opportunities available.

Another related area is criminal justice, which often intersects with science in investigative and legal contexts. Pursuing an online degree can be a flexible way to enter this field. To plan accordingly, prospective students should consider how much does it cost to get a criminal justice degree, helping them weigh the investment against possible career benefits.

For those looking to start with a shorter program, the best online associates in criminal justice provide a practical entry point. These programs prepare students for roles in law enforcement, legal assistance, and public safety industries.

Additionally, chemistry graduates may consider careers linked with the legal system by exploring paralegal studies associate degree options. This pathway offers a blend of science and legal knowledge, often leading to rewarding positions in law firms and corporate compliance.

Best Scientists Citing Ali A. Rownaghi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles