World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Rising Stars
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Rising Stars 48 372 372 15 15 115 6116
Chemistry 54 12873 11580 211 208 103 7293

G. Bharath publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by G. Bharath between 2014 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. G. Bharath published across 12 years, from 2014 to 2025, averaging 12.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2021. 26 of the 154 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2014 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2021. 2014: 2 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 30 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 22 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 16 publications
2014 2025

154 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
G. Bharath: publications per year, 2014 to 2025
Year Publications
2014 2
2015 4
2016 3
2017 9
2018 8
2019 14
2020 21
2021 30
2022 15
2023 22
2024 10
2025 16
Total 154
Download as CSV

G. Bharath publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where G. Bharath sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 103 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623 103
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

G. Bharath D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where G. Bharath sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933 54
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Rising Stars Award

Overview

G. Bharath is affiliated with the SRM Institute of Science and Technology, a private university located in Chennai, India. Their primary fields of study span engineering and materials science, with significant research contributions in biomedical engineering, renewable energy, sustainability and the environment, materials chemistry, water science and technology, and electrical and electronic engineering.

Their research areas are reflected in key topics including advanced photocatalysis techniques, membrane separation technologies, membrane-based ion separation techniques, catalysis for biomass conversion, graphene and nanomaterials applications, supercapacitor materials and fabrication, and MXene and MAX phase materials.

G. Bharath has authored numerous publications in notable scientific journals. Among recent papers are:

  • Green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles using Phoenix dactylifera waste as bioreductant for effective dye degradation and antibacterial performance in wastewater treatment (2020) published in Journal of Hazardous Materials
  • Biosorption performance of date palm empty fruit bunch wastes for toxic hexavalent chromium removal (2020) published in Environmental Research
  • In-vitro evaluation of electrospun cellulose acetate nanofiber containing Graphene oxide/TiO2/Curcumin for wound healing application (2021) published in Colloids and Surfaces A Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects
  • A review of the therapeutic and biological effects of edible and wild mushrooms (2021) published in Bioengineered
  • Augmented biohydrogen production from rice mill wastewater through nano-metal oxides assisted dark fermentation (2020) published in Bioresource Technology

G. Bharath frequently publishes in journals such as Environmental Research and Chemosphere, each having nine publications, Fuel with five, Electrochimica Acta with four, and Environmental Pollution with three.

Collaboration plays a notable role in their research activities. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Fawzi Banat (83 joint publications)
  • K. Rambabu (48 joint publications)
  • Abdul Hai (43 joint publications)
  • Mohammad Abu Haija (26 joint publications)
  • Shadi W. Hasan (17 joint publications)

Best Publications

  • Green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles using Phoenix dactylifera waste as bioreductant for effective dye degradation and antibacterial performance in wastewater treatment.

    K. Rambabu;G. Bharath;Fawzi Banat;Pau Loke Show

  • Mango leaf extract incorporated chitosan antioxidant film for active food packaging

    K Rambabu;K Rambabu;G Bharath;Fawzi Banat;Pau Loke Show

  • A review on the recent advances, challenges and future aspect of layered double hydroxides (LDH) – Containing hybrids as promising adsorbents for dyes removal

    Muhammad Daud;Abdul Hai;Fawzi Banat;Muhammad B. Wazir

  • Solvent-free mechanochemical synthesis of graphene oxide and Fe3O4–reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites for sensitive detection of nitrite

    G. Bharath;Rajesh Madhu;Shen Ming Chen;Vediyappan Veeramani

  • A comprehensive review on recently developed carbon based nanocomposites for capacitive deionization: From theory to practice

    Jimoh Oladunni;Jerina H. Zain;Abdul Hai;Fawzi Banat

  • Fabrication of Chitosan/PVA/GO/CuO patch for potential wound healing application.

    K.S. Venkataprasanna;J. Prakash;S. Vignesh;G. Bharath

  • Development of adsorption and electrosorption techniques for removal of organic and inorganic pollutants from wastewater using novel magnetite/porous graphene-based nanocomposites

    G. Bharath;G. Bharath;Emad Alhseinat;N. Ponpandian;Moonis Ali Khan

  • Biosorption performance of date palm empty fruit bunch wastes for toxic hexavalent chromium removal.

    K. Rambabu;G. Bharath;Fawzi Banat;Pau Loke Show

  • Enzymatic electrochemical glucose biosensors by mesoporous 1D hydroxyapatite-on-2D reduced graphene oxide

    G. Bharath;Rajesh Madhu;Shen Ming Chen;Vediyappan Veeramani

  • In-vitro evaluation of electrospun cellulose acetate nanofiber containing Graphene oxide/TiO2/Curcumin for wound healing application

    J. Prakash;K.S. Venkataprasanna;G. Bharath;Fawzi Banat

  • Enhanced electrochemical performances of peanut shell derived activated carbon and its Fe3O4 nanocomposites for capacitive deionization of Cr(VI) ions.

    G. Bharath;K. Rambabu;Fawzi Banat;Abdul Hai

  • Sunlight-Induced photochemical synthesis of Au nanodots on α-Fe2O3@Reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite and their enhanced heterogeneous catalytic properties.

    G. Bharath;Shoaib Anwer;R. V. Mangalaraja;Emad Alhseinat

  • Sol-Gel-Assisted Microwave-Derived Synthesis of Anatase Ag/TiO2/GO Nanohybrids toward Efficient Visible Light Phenol Degradation

    E. H. Alsharaeh;T. Bora;A. Soliman;Faheem Ahmed

  • Augmented biohydrogen production from rice mill wastewater through nano-metal oxides assisted dark fermentation

    K. Rambabu;G. Bharath;A. Thanigaivelan;D.B. Das

  • Date seeds biomass-derived activated carbon for efficient removal of NaCl from saline solution

    Abdul Hai;G. Bharath;K. Ram Babu;Hanifa Taher

  • Ferric oxide/date seed activated carbon nanocomposites mediated dark fermentation of date fruit wastes for enriched biohydrogen production

    K. Rambabu;G. Bharath;Fawzi Banat;Abdul Hai

  • Enhanced electrocatalytic activity of gold nanoparticles on hydroxyapatite nanorods for sensitive hydrazine sensors

    G. Bharath;G. Bharath;Alberto Naldoni;K. Hasini Ramsait;Ahmed Abdel-Wahab

  • Hydroxyapatite nanoparticles on dendritic α-Fe2O3 hierarchical architectures for a heterogeneous photocatalyst and adsorption of Pb(ii) ions from industrial wastewater

    G. Bharath;N. Ponpandian

  • Effective treatment of dye polluted wastewater using nanoporous CaCl2 modified polyethersulfone membrane

    K. Rambabu;K. Rambabu;G. Bharath;P. Monash;S. Velu

  • Synthesis of hierarchical Mn3O4 nanowires on reduced graphene oxide nanoarchitecture as effective pseudocapacitive electrodes for capacitive desalination application

    G. Bharath;Naman Arora;Abdul Hai;Fawzi Banat

Frequent Co-Authors

Fawzi Banat
Fawzi Banat Khalifa University
N. Ponpandian
N. Ponpandian Bharathiar University
Pau Loke Show
Pau Loke Show UCSI University
Shadi W. Hasan
Shadi W. Hasan Khalifa University
Chinnuswamy Viswanathan
Chinnuswamy Viswanathan Bharathiar University
Shen-Ming Chen
Shen-Ming Chen National Taipei University of Technology
Mu. Naushad
Mu. Naushad King Saud University
D. Mangalaraj
D. Mangalaraj Bharathiar University
Kin Liao
Kin Liao Khalifa University
Shahid Iqbal
Shahid Iqbal National University of Sciences and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Chemistry, exploring related fields like forensic science can open diverse career opportunities. A forensic science degree salary is often competitive, reflecting the specialized skills required to analyze chemical evidence in legal contexts.

Those considering a broader legal or criminal justice focus might explore the cost of criminal justice degree, especially if opting for online programs that offer flexibility and affordability. Many accredited options, such as an accredited online criminal justice associate degree, can provide foundational knowledge crucial for various law enforcement or legal support roles.

Additionally, understanding the different roles within the legal support system is valuable. Various types of paralegals offer distinct career paths, many of which intersect with scientific expertise, including those grounded in chemistry. These pathways highlight the versatility and real-world applications of a chemistry education beyond traditional lab work.

Best Scientists Citing G. Bharath

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles