World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Pau Loke Show

Pau Loke Show

Award Badge
Biology and Biochemistry
Malaysia
2026
Award Badge
Engineering and Technology
Malaysia
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 117 63 59 5 5 662 51650
Biology and Biochemistry 112 894 794 1 1 589 47473

Pau Loke Show publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Pau Loke Show between 2011 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Pau Loke Show published across 16 years, from 2011 to 2026, averaging 58.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 195 publications in 2021. 42 of the 943 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
50 100 150
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2011 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 195. Peak 195 publications in 2021. 2011: 1 publication 2012: 4 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 24 publications 2018: 40 publications 2019: 81 publications 2020: 119 publications 2021: 195 publications 2022: 173 publications 2023: 159 publications 2024: 58 publications 2025: 41 publications 2026: 1 publication
2011 2026

943 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Pau Loke Show: publications per year, 2011 to 2026
Year Publications
2011 1
2012 4
2013 5
2014 4
2015 19
2016 19
2017 24
2018 40
2019 81
2020 119
2021 195
2022 173
2023 159
2024 58
2025 41
2026 1
Total 943
Download as CSV

Pau Loke Show publications per year - data summary

  • Pau Loke Show, a Engineering and Technology scholar from UCSI University, has 943 publications recorded across 16 years, from 2011 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2011 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2021, with 195 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 2011 and 2026, with 1 publication each.
  • The rate of publication averages 58.9 papers per year over the whole span, or 58.9 per year counting only the 16 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 432 publications, 46% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2011-2016: 52 publications (8.7 per year); 2017-2022: 632 publications (105.3 per year); 2023-2026: 259 publications (64.8 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Pau Loke Show publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pau Loke Show sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 658–667 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 662 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9 662
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Pau Loke Show publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 9,796 Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 78 ranges running from 38–47 to 804+ publications.
  • Pau Loke Show, a Engineering and Technology scholar from UCSI University, records 662 publications - the 98th percentile of the discipline.
  • 98% of ranked Engineering and Technology scientists score the same or lower than Pau Loke Show, and about 2% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 198–207 publications range, and Pau Loke Show ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 148–157 publications, holding 457 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 61% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 228–237 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 804 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Pau Loke Show D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pau Loke Show sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 107+ D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 117 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99 117
Download as CSV

Pau Loke Show D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 9,796 Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 78 ranges running from 30 to 107+ D-Index.
  • Pau Loke Show, a Engineering and Technology scholar from UCSI University, records 117 D-Index - the 99th percentile of the discipline.
  • 99% of ranked Engineering and Technology scientists score the same or lower than Pau Loke Show, and about 1% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 47 D-Index range, and Pau Loke Show ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 426 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 49 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more, 99 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Biology and Biochemistry in Malaysia Leader Award
  • 2026 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in Malaysia Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Biology and Biochemistry in Malaysia Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in Malaysia Leader Award

Overview

Pau Loke Show is affiliated with the University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus in Malaysia. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Engineering, with specific contributions in several subfields such as Biomedical Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Water Science and Technology, Materials Chemistry, and Mechanical Engineering.

The scientist's work spans topics including:

  • Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Biodiesel Production and Applications
  • Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Membrane Separation Technologies
  • Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies

The research output of Pau Loke Show includes numerous papers published in several notable venues. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • Chemosphere
  • Bioresource Technology
  • Environmental Research
  • Processes
  • Fuel

Recent papers cover various aspects of wastewater treatment, energy, and environmental sustainability. Some of the notable papers include:

  • "A review on conventional and novel materials towards heavy metal adsorption in wastewater treatment application" (2021), published in Journal of Cleaner Production
  • "Recent developments in physical, biological, chemical, and hybrid treatment techniques for removing emerging contaminants from wastewater" (2021), published in Journal of Hazardous Materials
  • "Progress in biomass torrefaction: Principles, applications and challenges" (2020), published in Progress in Energy and Combustion Science
  • "Conventional and emerging technologies for removal of antibiotics from wastewater" (2020), published in Journal of Hazardous Materials
  • "A review on effective removal of emerging contaminants from aquatic systems: Current trends and scope for further research" (2020), published in Journal of Hazardous Materials

Pau Loke Show collaborates frequently with a number of researchers, including:

  • Kit Wayne Chew
  • Kuan Shiong Khoo
  • Muhammad Mubashir
  • Heli Siti Halimatul Munawaroh
  • Man Kee Lam

Best Publications

  • Microalgae biorefinery: High value products perspectives.

    Kit Wayne Chew;Jing Ying Yap;Pau Loke Show;Ng Hui Suan

  • A review on conventional and novel materials towards heavy metal adsorption in wastewater treatment application

    Wai Siong Chai;Wai Siong Chai;Jie Ying Cheun;P. Senthil Kumar;Muhammad Mubashir

  • Microalgae: A potential alternative to health supplementation for humans

    Apurav Krishna Koyande;Kit Wayne Chew;Krishnamoorthy Rambabu;Yang Tao

  • Progress in biomass torrefaction: Principles, applications and challenges

    Wei Hsin Chen;Bo Jhih Lin;Bo Jhih Lin;Yu Ying Lin;Yen Shih Chu

  • Recent developments in physical, biological, chemical, and hybrid treatment techniques for removing emerging contaminants from wastewater.

    S.F. Ahmed;M. Mofijur;M. Mofijur;Samiha Nuzhat;Anika Tasnim Chowdhury

  • Conventional and emerging technologies for removal of antibiotics from wastewater

    Bao Lee Phoon;Chong Cheen Ong;Mohamed Shuaib Mohamed Saheed;Pau Loke Show

  • A review on effective removal of emerging contaminants from aquatic systems: Current trends and scope for further research.

    B. Senthil Rathi;P. Senthil Kumar;Pau-Loke Show

  • Biosequestration of atmospheric CO2 and flue gas-containing CO2 by microalgae

    Wai Yan Cheah;Pau Loke Show;Jo Shu Chang;Tau Chuan Ling

  • A critical review on various remediation approaches for heavy metal contaminants removal from contaminated soils.

    Saravanan Rajendran;T.A.K. Priya;Kuan Shiong Khoo;Tuan K.A. Hoang

  • Waste to bioenergy: a review on the recent conversion technologies

    Sze Ying Lee;Revathy Sankaran;Kit Wayne Chew;Chung Hong Tan

  • Green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles using Phoenix dactylifera waste as bioreductant for effective dye degradation and antibacterial performance in wastewater treatment.

    K. Rambabu;G. Bharath;Fawzi Banat;Pau Loke Show

  • Mango leaf extract incorporated chitosan antioxidant film for active food packaging

    K Rambabu;K Rambabu;G Bharath;Fawzi Banat;Pau Loke Show

  • A critical review on biochar for enhancing biogas production from anaerobic digestion of food waste and sludge

    Manish Kumar;Manish Kumar;Shanta Dutta;Siming You;Gang Luo

  • Recent developments on algal biochar production and characterization.

    Kai Ling Yu;Beng Fye Lau;Pau Loke Show;Hwai Chyuan Ong

  • Sustainability of the four generations of biofuels – A review

    Nurul Syahirah Mat Aron;Kuan Shiong Khoo;Kit Wayne Chew;Pau Loke Show

  • Greenhouse gases utilization: A review

    Luqman Jeffry;Mei Yin Ong;Saifuddin Nomanbhay;M. Mofijur;M. Mofijur

  • Recent advances biodegradation and biosorption of organic compounds from wastewater: Microalgae-bacteria consortium - A review.

    Sook Sin Chan;Kuan Shiong Khoo;Kit Wayne Chew;Tau Chuan Ling

  • A state-of-the-art review on thermochemical conversion of biomass for biofuel production: A TG-FTIR approach

    Hwai Chyuan Ong;Wei Hsin Chen;Yashvir Singh;Yashvir Singh;Yong Yang Gan;Yong Yang Gan

  • Potential utilization of bioproducts from microalgae for the quality enhancement of natural products.

    Doris Ying Ying Tang;Kuan Shiong Khoo;Kit Wayne Chew;Yang Tao

  • Multifaceted roles of microalgae in the application of wastewater biotreatment: A review

    Wai Siong Chai;Wee Gee Tan;Heli Siti Halimatul Munawaroh;Vijai Kumar Gupta

  • Technologies for Biogas Upgrading to Biomethane: A Review.

    Amir Izzuddin Adnan;Mei Yin Ong;Saifuddin Nomanbhay;Kit Wayne Chew

Frequent Co-Authors

Tau Chuan Ling
Tau Chuan Ling University of Malaya
Jo Shu Chang
Jo Shu Chang National Cheng Kung University
Wei-Hsin Chen
Wei-Hsin Chen National Cheng Kung University
Joon Ching Juan
Joon Ching Juan University of Malaya
Jun-Wei Lim
Jun-Wei Lim Universiti Teknologi Petronas
Yang Tao
Yang Tao Nanjing Agricultural University
Man Kee Lam
Man Kee Lam Universiti Teknologi Petronas
Hwai Chyuan Ong
Hwai Chyuan Ong Sunway University
Fawzi Banat
Fawzi Banat Khalifa University
Shih-Hsin Ho
Shih-Hsin Ho Harbin Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying Engineering and Technology in the USA, you may want to explore related online degrees and accelerated learning options. Flexible study paths allow you to quickly gain skills and credentials, making it easier to enter or advance within your desired career.

Many colleges now offer 6 week courses online, ideal for busy professionals or those wanting to upskill fast. These programs cover a range of tech-focused subjects and foundational skills. For those considering the business side of technology, an accelerated finance degree can open doors to key roles in financial technology and analysis.

Leadership and management skills are crucial in technology fields. Pursuing an mba in 6 months provides a rapid pathway to advanced positions in project management or tech startups. If you have an interest in law or compliance, the best online paralegal programs enable you to combine technical literacy with legal expertise—both in high demand.

By choosing online degree programs that fit your schedule and career goals, you can make efficient progress toward a rewarding future in engineering, technology, or related sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Pau Loke Show

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles