World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
42
Citations
7173
World Ranking
7381
National Ranking
2630

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
40
Citations
6697
World Ranking
3896
National Ranking
968

Daniel C. Dey publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel C. Dey sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 196 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Daniel C. Dey D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel C. Dey sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel C. Dey is affiliated with the US Forest Service in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences, with particular attention to global and planetary change, nature and landscape conservation, and ecology.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, including:

  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Forest ecology and management
  • Ecology and vegetation dynamics studies
  • Rangeland and wildlife management
  • Forest ecology and biodiversity studies
  • Forest management and policy
  • Tree-ring climate responses

Dey has contributed to numerous peer-reviewed publications, frequently appearing in specialized journals such as:

  • Forest Ecology and Management
  • Canadian Journal of Forest Research
  • Fire Ecology
  • Journal of Forestry
  • Forests

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Daniel C. Dey include:

  • "The North American tree-ring fire-scar network," 2022, Ecosphere
  • "Influence of canopy openness, ungulate exclosure, and low-intensity fire for improved oak regeneration in temperate Europe," 2020, Ecology and Evolution
  • "Mixedwood silviculture in North America: the science and art of managing for complex, multi-species temperate forests," 2021, Canadian Journal of Forest Research
  • "Invasive plant management in eastern North American Forests: A systematic review," 2023, Forest Ecology and Management
  • "Relative influence of stand and site factors on aboveground live-tree carbon sequestration and mortality in managed and unmanaged forests," 2021, Forest Ecology and Management

Daniel C. Dey often collaborates with other researchers in the field. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Michael C. Stambaugh
  • John M. Kabrick
  • Benjamin O. Knapp
  • Joseph M. Marschall
  • J. Davis Goode

Best Publications

  • Dynamics of an Anthropogenic Fire Regime

    Richard P. Guyette;R. M. Muzika;Daniel C. Dey

  • Mechanical site preparation for forest restoration

    Magnus Löf;Daniel C. Dey;Rafael M. Navarro;Douglass F. Jacobs

  • A Meta-Analysis of the Fire-Oak Hypothesis: Does Prescribed Burning Promote Oak Reproduction in Eastern North America?

    Patrick H. Brose;Daniel C. Dey;Ross J. Phillips;Thomas A. Waldrop

  • Sustaining oak forests in eastern North America: regeneration and recruitment, the pillars of sustainability.

    Daniel C. Dey

  • Predicting Fire Frequency with Chemistry and Climate

    Richard P. Guyette;Michael C. Stambaugh;Daniel C. Dey;Rose-Marie Muzika

  • Refining the oak-fire hypothesis for management of oak-dominated forests of the eastern United States

    Mary A. Arthur;Heather D. Alexander;Daniel C. Dey;Callie J. Schweitzer

  • Returning fire to Ozark Highland forest ecosystems : Effects on advance regeneration

    Daniel C. Dey;George Hartman

  • Morphological indicators of stock quality and field performance of red oak ( Quercus rubra L.) seedling underplanted in a central Ontario shelterwood

    Daniel C. Dey;William C. Parker

  • Artificial Regeneration of Major Oak (Quercus) Species in the Eastern United States—A Review of the Literature

    Daniel C. Dey;Douglass Jacobs;Ken McNabb;Gary W. Miller

  • The role of environmental factors in oak decline and mortality in the Ozark Highlands

    John M. Kabrick;Daniel C. Dey;Randy G. Jensen;Michael Wallendorf

  • Effect of fire severity on physical and biochemical soil properties in Zagros oak (Quercus brantii Lindl.) forests in Iran

    M. Heydari;A. Rostamy;F. Najafi;Daniel C. Dey

  • Chloroform decreases rumen methanogenesis and methanogen populations without altering rumen function in cattle

    T. Knight;R.S. Ronimus;D. Dey;C. Tootill

  • Fire scars reveal variability and dynamics of eastern fire regimes

    Richard P. Guyette;Daniel C. Dey;Michael C. Stambaugh;Rose-Marie Muzika

  • Barriers to natural regeneration in temperate forests across the USA

    Daniel C. Dey;Benjamin O. Knapp;Mike A. Battaglia;Robert L. Deal

  • The fireoak literature of eastern North America: synthesis and guidelines

    Patrick H. Brose;Daniel C. Dey;Thomas A. Waldrop

  • The ecological basis for oak silviculture in Eastern North America.

    D. Dey;W. J. McShea;W. M. Healy

  • Competitive capacity of Quercus rubra L. planted in Arkansas' Boston Mountains

    Martin A. Spetich;Daniel C. Dey;Paul S. Johnson;David L. Graney

  • Underplanting to sustain future stocking of oak (Quercus) in temperate deciduous forests

    Daniel C. Dey;Emile S. Gardiner;Callie J. Schweitzer;John M. Kabrick

  • Anthropogenic fire history and red oak forests in south-central Ontario

    Daniel C. Dey;Richard P. Guyette

  • Managing succession in conifer plantations: converting young red pine (Pinus resinosa Ait.) plantations to native forest types by thinning and underplanting

    William C. Parker;Ken A. Elliott;Daniel C. Dey;Eric Boysen

  • The Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project: past, present, and future

    Brian L. Brookshire;Randy Jensen;Daniel C. Dey

  • Influence of overstory density on ecophysiology of red oak (Quercus rubra) and sugar maple (Acer saccharum) seedlings in central Ontario shelterwoods.

    William C. Parker;Daniel C. Dey

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard P. Guyette
Richard P. Guyette University of Missouri
Stephen R. Shifley
Stephen R. Shifley United States Department of Agriculture
Anthony W. D'Amato
Anthony W. D'Amato University of Vermont
Hong S. He
Hong S. He University of Missouri
Kenneth L. Clark
Kenneth L. Clark US Forest Service
Brian J. Palik
Brian J. Palik US Forest Service
Douglass F. Jacobs
Douglass F. Jacobs Purdue University West Lafayette
J. Morgan Varner
J. Morgan Varner US Forest Service
David A. MacLean
David A. MacLean University of New Brunswick
Mary A. Arthur
Mary A. Arthur University of Kentucky

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Daniel C. Dey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles