World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Menno C. van Zelm

Menno C. van Zelm

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Immunology 53 3969 3660 169 158 236 10830

Menno C. van Zelm publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Menno C. van Zelm between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Menno C. van Zelm published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 12.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 2019. 31 of the 271 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 37. Peak 37 publications in 2019. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 37 publications 2020: 27 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 15 publications
2005 2025

271 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Menno C. van Zelm: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 3
2007 4
2008 8
2009 6
2010 6
2011 12
2012 4
2013 10
2014 12
2015 11
2016 16
2017 13
2018 20
2019 37
2020 27
2021 19
2022 16
2023 15
2024 16
2025 15
Total 271
Download as CSV

Menno C. van Zelm publication distribution in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Immunology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Menno C. van Zelm sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 76 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 62–71 to 807+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 152–161 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 232–241 publications, is where this scientist sits. 62–71 publications: 9 scientists 72–81 publications: 23 scientists 82–91 publications: 40 scientists 92–101 publications: 72 scientists 102–111 publications: 86 scientists 112–121 publications: 108 scientists 122–131 publications: 150 scientists 132–141 publications: 160 scientists 142–151 publications: 159 scientists 152–161 publications: 189 scientists 162–171 publications: 166 scientists 172–181 publications: 181 scientists 182–191 publications: 188 scientists 192–201 publications: 187 scientists 202–211 publications: 178 scientists 212–221 publications: 158 scientists 222–231 publications: 168 scientists 232–241 publications: 159 scientists 242–251 publications: 160 scientists 252–261 publications: 148 scientists 262–271 publications: 116 scientists 272–281 publications: 125 scientists 282–291 publications: 115 scientists 292–301 publications: 111 scientists 302–311 publications: 95 scientists 312–321 publications: 97 scientists 322–331 publications: 97 scientists 332–341 publications: 99 scientists 342–351 publications: 96 scientists 352–361 publications: 69 scientists 362–371 publications: 76 scientists 372–381 publications: 71 scientists 382–391 publications: 71 scientists 392–401 publications: 62 scientists 402–411 publications: 54 scientists 412–421 publications: 41 scientists 422–431 publications: 63 scientists 432–441 publications: 53 scientists 442–451 publications: 31 scientists 452–461 publications: 42 scientists 462–471 publications: 40 scientists 472–481 publications: 29 scientists 482–491 publications: 34 scientists 492–501 publications: 30 scientists 502–511 publications: 23 scientists 512–521 publications: 41 scientists 522–531 publications: 29 scientists 532–541 publications: 28 scientists 542–551 publications: 16 scientists 552–561 publications: 18 scientists 562–571 publications: 18 scientists 572–581 publications: 17 scientists 582–591 publications: 17 scientists 592–601 publications: 17 scientists 602–611 publications: 19 scientists 612–621 publications: 13 scientists 622–631 publications: 12 scientists 632–641 publications: 11 scientists 642–651 publications: 16 scientists 652–661 publications: 9 scientists 662–671 publications: 5 scientists 672–681 publications: 13 scientists 682–691 publications: 12 scientists 692–701 publications: 6 scientists 702–711 publications: 6 scientists 712–721 publications: 9 scientists 722–731 publications: 9 scientists 732–741 publications: 6 scientists 742–751 publications: 11 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 7 scientists 772–781 publications: 12 scientists 782–791 publications: 7 scientists 792–801 publications: 5 scientists 802–806 publications: 1 scientist 807+ publications: 100 scientists
62–71 publications 807+

This scientist: 236 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Immunology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,929 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
62–71 9
72–81 23
82–91 40
92–101 72
102–111 86
112–121 108
122–131 150
132–141 160
142–151 159
152–161 189
162–171 166
172–181 181
182–191 188
192–201 187
202–211 178
212–221 158
222–231 168
232–241 159 236
242–251 160
252–261 148
262–271 116
272–281 125
282–291 115
292–301 111
302–311 95
312–321 97
322–331 97
332–341 99
342–351 96
352–361 69
362–371 76
372–381 71
382–391 71
392–401 62
402–411 54
412–421 41
422–431 63
432–441 53
442–451 31
452–461 42
462–471 40
472–481 29
482–491 34
492–501 30
502–511 23
512–521 41
522–531 29
532–541 28
542–551 16
552–561 18
562–571 18
572–581 17
582–591 17
592–601 17
602–611 19
612–621 13
622–631 12
632–641 11
642–651 16
652–661 9
662–671 5
672–681 13
682–691 12
692–701 6
702–711 6
712–721 9
722–731 9
732–741 6
742–751 11
752–761 10
762–771 7
772–781 12
782–791 7
792–801 5
802–806 1
807+ 100
Download as CSV

Menno C. van Zelm D-index placement in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Immunology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Menno C. van Zelm sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 157+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 201. Most scientists, 201, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 28 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 91 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 157 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 192 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 175 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 188 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 177 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 155 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 194 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 201 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 197 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 201 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 173 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 167 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 172 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 199 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 184 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 133 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 163 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 125 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 121 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 102 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 96 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 75 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 74 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 66 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 68 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 60 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 54 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 36 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 23 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 52 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 41 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 34 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 25 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 28 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 11 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 19 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 20 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 17 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 14 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 15 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 9 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 11 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 9 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 7 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 7 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 5 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156 D-Index: 6 scientists 157+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 157+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Immunology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,929 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 28
42–43 91
44–45 157
46–47 192
48–49 175
50–51 188
52–53 177 53
54–55 155
56–57 194
58–59 201
60–61 197
62–63 201
64–65 173
66–67 167
68–69 172
70–71 199
72–73 184
74–75 133
76–77 163
78–79 127
80–81 121
82–83 125
84–85 121
86–87 102
88–89 96
90–91 75
92–93 72
94–95 74
96–97 66
98–99 68
100–101 49
102–103 60
104–105 54
106–107 36
108–109 23
110–111 52
112–113 41
114–115 34
116–117 25
118–119 28
120–121 11
122–123 20
124–125 27
126–127 19
128–129 20
130–131 16
132–133 17
134–135 14
136–137 15
138–139 9
140–141 11
142–143 9
144–145 9
146–147 7
148–149 7
150–151 7
152–153 5
154–155 8
156 6
157+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Menno C. van Zelm is affiliated with Monash University in Australia. Their research spans medicine and immunology and microbiology, with a particular focus on immunology, infectious diseases, and related subfields such as immunology and allergy, genetics, and oncology.

Their work covers diverse topics including immunodeficiency and autoimmune disorders, allergic rhinitis and sensitization, SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research, T-cell and B-cell immunology, asthma and respiratory diseases, immune cell function and interaction, and food allergy and anaphylaxis research.

Among their recent publications are:

  • Rapid generation of durable B cell memory to SARS-CoV-2 spike and nucleocapsid proteins in COVID-19 and convalescence, 2020, Science Immunology
  • A compendium answering 150 questions on COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2, 2020, Allergy
  • Vaccines and allergic reactions: The past, the current COVID-19 pandemic, and future perspectives, 2021, Allergy
  • Immune system development varies according to age, location, and anemia in African children, 2020, Science Translational Medicine
  • Beyond monogenetic rare variants: tackling the low rate of genetic diagnoses in predominantly antibody deficiency, 2020, Cellular and Molecular Immunology

Their frequent coauthors include Robyn E. O'Hehir, Emily S.J. Edwards, P. Mark Hogarth, Nirupama Varese, and Pei M. Aui.

Menno C. van Zelm has contributed to multiple publication venues, notably Allergy, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Frontiers in Immunology, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and Clinical & Translational Immunology.

Best Publications

  • An antibody-deficiency syndrome due to mutations in the CD19 gene

    Menno C van Zelm;Ismail Reisli;Mirjam van der Burg;Diana Castaño

  • Review article: short chain fatty acids as potential therapeutic agents in human gastrointestinal and inflammatory disorders

    P. A. Gill;M. C. van Zelm;J. G. Muir;P. R. Gibson

  • Human memory B cells originate from three distinct germinal center-dependent and -independent maturation pathways.

    Magdalena A. Berkowska;Gertjan J. A. Driessen;Vasilis Bikos;Christina Grosserichter-Wagener

  • CD81 gene defect in humans disrupts CD19 complex formation and leads to antibody deficiency

    Menno C. Van Zelm;Julie Smet;Brigitte Adams;Françoise Mascart

  • Replication history of B lymphocytes reveals homeostatic proliferation and extensive antigen-induced B cell expansion

    Menno C. van Zelm;Tomasz Szczepański;Mirjam van der Burg;Jacques J.M. van Dongen

  • Human peripheral blood B-cell compartments: A crossroad in B-cell traffic†

    M Perez-Andres;B Paiva;W G Nieto;A Caraux

  • The 3D Structure of the Immunoglobulin Heavy-Chain Locus: Implications for Long-Range Genomic Interactions

    Suchit Jhunjhunwala;Menno C. van Zelm;Mandy M. Peak;Steve Cutchin

  • Rapid generation of durable B cell memory to SARS-CoV-2 spike and nucleocapsid proteins in COVID-19 and convalescence.

    Gemma E. Hartley;Emily S.J. Edwards;Pei M. Aui;Nirupama Varese

  • Age-associated distribution of normal B-cell and plasma cell subsets in peripheral blood

    Elena Blanco;Martín Pérez-Andrés;Sonia Arriba-Méndez;Teresa Contreras-Sanfeliciano

  • The activation of the adaptive immune system: Cross-talk between antigen-presenting cells, T cells and B cells

    Joke M.M. den Haan;Ramon Arens;Menno C. van Zelm

  • Estimating human age from T-cell DNA rearrangements

    D. Zubakov;F. Liu;M.C. van Zelm;J. Vermeulen

  • Ig gene rearrangement steps are initiated in early human precursor B cell subsets and correlate with specific transcription factor expression

    Menno C. van Zelm;Mirjam van der Burg;Dick de Ridder;Barbara H. Barendregt

  • Human Secretory IgM Emerges from Plasma Cells Clonally Related to Gut Memory B Cells and Targets Highly Diverse Commensals

    Giuliana Magri;Laura Comerma;Marc Pybus;Jordi Sintes

  • CD nomenclature 2015: Human leukocyte differentiation antigen workshops as a driving force in immunology

    Pablo Engel;Laurence Boumsell;Robert Balderas;Armand Bensussan

  • Chromatin architecture and the generation of antigen receptor diversity.

    Suchit Jhunjhunwala;Menno C. van Zelm;Menno C. van Zelm;Mandy M. Peak;Cornelis Murre

  • Novel mutations in a Japanese patient with CD19 deficiency

    H Kanegane;K Agematsu;T Futatani;M M Sira

  • Novel mutations in TNFRSF7/CD27: Clinical, immunologic, and genetic characterization of human CD27 deficiency

    Omar K. Alkhairy;Omar K. Alkhairy;Ruy Perez-Becker;Gertjan J. Driessen;Hassan Abolhassani;Hassan Abolhassani

  • Biallelic loss-of-function mutation in NIK causes a primary immunodeficiency with multifaceted aberrant lymphoid immunity

    Katharina L. Willmann;Stefanie Klaver;Figen Doğu;Elisangela Santos-Valente

  • Systematic evaluation and validation of reference and library selection methods for deconvolution of cord blood DNA methylation data

    Kristina Gervin;Lucas A Salas;Kelly M Bakulski;Menno C van Zelm;Menno C van Zelm

  • A compendium answering 150 questions on COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2.

    Carmen Riggioni;Pasquale Comberiati;Pasquale Comberiati;Mattia Giovannini;Ioana Agache

  • Antibody deficiency in patients with ataxia telangiectasia is caused by disturbed B- and T-cell homeostasis and reduced immune repertoire diversity

    Gertjan J. Driessen;Hanna IJspeert;Corry M.R. Weemaes;Ásgeir Haraldsson

Frequent Co-Authors

Jacques J.M. van Dongen
Jacques J.M. van Dongen Leiden University Medical Center
Mirjam van der Burg
Mirjam van der Burg Erasmus University Rotterdam
Robyn E O'Hehir
Robyn E O'Hehir Monash University
Henriëtte A. Moll
Henriëtte A. Moll Erasmus University Rotterdam
Vincent W. V. Jaddoe
Vincent W. V. Jaddoe Erasmus University Rotterdam
Alberto Orfao
Alberto Orfao University of Salamanca
Hirokazu Kanegane
Hirokazu Kanegane Tokyo Medical and Dental University
Paul U. Cameron
Paul U. Cameron University of Melbourne
P. Mark Hogarth
P. Mark Hogarth Burnet Institute
Louis Boon
Louis Boon University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Immunology, exploring related online degrees can open doors to diverse career opportunities. Many students pursue advanced nursing pathways, such as Family Nurse Practitioner programs. Finding an easiest fnp program online can help balance rigorous coursework with other commitments.

Specializing further, psychiatric and mental health nursing offers rewarding roles in healthcare. Prospective students should consider the best online psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner programs to ensure quality clinical placements and hands-on experience.

Budget is another important factor when selecting a program. Thankfully, there are affordable pmhnp programs that maintain strong academic standards without the high price tag. This makes advanced education accessible to more aspiring professionals.

After obtaining a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree, understanding the financial outlook is key. The dnp salary by state varies, influencing job prospects and relocation decisions. Evaluating these factors ensures informed career planning in the evolving field of immunology and nursing.

Best Scientists Citing Menno C. van Zelm

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles