World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Maren Bennewitz

Maren Bennewitz

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
10734
World Ranking
9985
National Ranking
501

Maren Bennewitz publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maren Bennewitz sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 154 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Maren Bennewitz D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maren Bennewitz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Maren Bennewitz is affiliated with the University of Bonn in Germany. Their research spans multiple interconnected fields within computer science and engineering, with a substantial focus on robotics and intelligent systems.

The main fields of study for Maren Bennewitz include:

  • Computer Science
  • Engineering

Their subfields of study include:

  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Control and Systems Engineering
  • Plant Science
  • Aerospace Engineering

Within these areas, their principal research topics cover:

  • Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
  • Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Smart Agriculture and AI
  • Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Advanced Vision and Imaging

Their publication record reveals contributions to diverse venues, including:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
  • 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)
  • 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)
  • European Conference on Education official conference proceedings

Notable recent papers authored by or in collaboration with them are:

  • Research priorities to leverage smart digital technologies for sustainable crop production, 2024, European Journal of Agronomy
  • The design of self-organizing human-swarm intelligence, 2021, Adaptive Behavior
  • Deep Reinforcement Learning for Next-Best-View Planning in Agricultural Applications, 2022, 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)
  • Fruit Mapping with Shape Completion for Autonomous Crop Monitoring, 2022, 2022 IEEE 18th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE)
  • Spatiotemporal Attention Enhances Lidar-Based Robot Navigation in Dynamic Environments, 2024, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Maren Bennewitz include:

  • Nils Dengler
  • Jorge de Heuvel
  • Rohit Menon
  • Sicong Pan
  • Tobias Zaenker

Best Publications

  • OctoMap: an efficient probabilistic 3D mapping framework based on octrees

    Armin Hornung;Kai M. Wurm;Maren Bennewitz;Cyrill Stachniss

  • MINERVA: a second-generation museum tour-guide robot

    S. Thrun;M. Bennewitz;W. Burgard;A.B. Cremers

  • Probabilistic Algorithms and the Interactive Museum Tour-Guide Robot Minerva

    Sebastian Thrun;Michael Beetz;Maren Bennewitz;Wolfram Burgard

  • Learning Motion Patterns of People for Compliant Robot Motion

    Maren Bennewitz;Wolfram Burgard;Grzegorz Cielniak;Sebastian Thrun

  • Finding and optimizing solvable priority schemes for decoupled path planning techniques for teams of mobile robots

    Maren Bennewitz;Wolfram Burgard;Sebastian Thrun

  • Whole-body model-predictive control applied to the HRP-2 humanoid

    J. Koenemann;A. Del Prete;Y. Tassa;E. Todorov

  • Optimizing schedules for prioritized path planning of multi-robot systems

    M. Bennewitz;W. Burgard;S. Thrun

  • Real-time imitation of human whole-body motions by humanoids

    Jonas Koenemann;Felix Burget;Maren Bennewitz

  • Humanoid robot localization in complex indoor environments

    Armin Hornung;Kai M. Wurm;Maren Bennewitz

  • Towards a humanoid museum guide robot that interacts with multiple persons

    M. Bennewitz;F. Faber;D. Joho;M. Schreiber

  • Learning motion patterns of persons for mobile service robots

    M. Bennewitz;W. Burgard;S. Thrun

  • The humanoid museum tour guide Robotinho

    Felix Faber;Maren Bennewitz;Clemens Eppner;Attila Gorog

  • Feature-based head pose estimation from images

    T. Vatahska;M. Bennewitz;S. Behnke

  • Real-time navigation in 3D environments based on depth camera data

    Daniel Maier;Armin Hornung;Maren Bennewitz

  • A visual odometry framework robust to motion blur

    Alberto Pretto;Emanuele Menegatti;Maren Bennewitz;Wolfram Burgard

  • Using EM to learn motion behaviors of persons with mobile robots

    M. Bennewitz;W. Burgard;S. Thrun

  • Navigation in three-dimensional cluttered environments for mobile manipulation

    Armin Hornung;Mike Phillips;E. Gil Jones;Maren Bennewitz

  • Anytime search-based footstep planning with suboptimality bounds

    Armin Hornung;Andrew Dornbush;Maxim Likhachev;Maren Bennewitz

  • Integrated, plan-based control of autonomous robot in human environments

    M. Beetz;T. Arbuckle;T. Belker;A.B. Cremers

  • Predictive Collision Avoidance for the Dynamic Window Approach

    Marcell Missura;Maren Bennewitz

  • An Efficient Probabilistic 3D Mapping Framework Based on Octrees

    Armin Hornung;Kai M. Wurm;Maren Bennewitz;Cyrill Stachniss

Frequent Co-Authors

Wolfram Burgard
Wolfram Burgard University of Technology Nuremberg
Sven Behnke
Sven Behnke University of Bonn
Cyrill Stachniss
Cyrill Stachniss University of Bonn
Sebastian Thrun
Sebastian Thrun Stanford University
Dirk Schulz
Dirk Schulz TU Dortmund University
Armin B. Cremers
Armin B. Cremers University of Bonn
Michael Beetz
Michael Beetz University of Bremen
Dieter Fox
Dieter Fox University of Washington
Frank Dellaert
Frank Dellaert Georgia Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Computer Science opens doors to diverse career pathways. Students often wonder how their choices compare to the best college majors in today’s job market. Computer Science consistently ranks high for its employment prospects, but it’s important to also consider your personal interests and the flexibility of online learning.

Many aspiring professionals look for the easiest masters degree to get online, balancing advancement with manageability. Computer Science master’s programs vary in intensity, so researching curriculum and support services is crucial for finding the right fit.

Cost is another key factor. Those aiming for advanced qualifications may seek out the cheapest online phd programs in usa to maximize the return on investment. Affordable options make doctoral studies more accessible without compromising on quality or career outcomes.

If quick advancement is your goal, you might consider programs like the quickest edd program available. These fast-track degrees help you fast-forward your career in education, technology leadership, or research. By evaluating your budget, career goals, and desired pace, you can choose the online pathway that fits you best.

Best Scientists Citing Maren Bennewitz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles