World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Charlotte Cordonnier

Charlotte Cordonnier

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
79
Citations
32856
World Ranking
17372
National Ranking
577

Charlotte Cordonnier publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charlotte Cordonnier sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 447 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Charlotte Cordonnier D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charlotte Cordonnier sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Charlotte Cordonnier is affiliated with the University of Lille in France and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, particularly focusing on neurology and cerebrovascular research. Their body of work spans a wide variety of topics related to stroke management, brain hemorrhage, and cerebrovascular diseases.

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Hilde Hénon
  • Barbara Casolla
  • Laurent Puy
  • Didier Leys
  • Marco Pasi

Charlotte Cordonnier's research is prominently published in several key venues, with multiple publications occurring in the following journals:

  • Stroke
  • The Lancet Neurology
  • European Stroke Journal
  • Neurology
  • Revue Neurologique

The main field of study for their work is Medicine, with subfields focusing primarily on:

  • Neurology
  • Epidemiology
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Internal Medicine
  • Rehabilitation

Key topics addressed in their publications include:

  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

Among their significant recent papers are:

  • 2022 Guideline for the Management of Patients With Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (2022), published in Stroke
  • Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease-advances since 2013 (2023), published in The Lancet Neurology
  • The Boston criteria version 2.0 for cerebral amyloid angiopathy: a multicentre, retrospective, MRI-neuropathology diagnostic accuracy study (2022), published in The Lancet Neurology
  • Noncontrast Computed Tomography vs Computed Tomography Perfusion or Magnetic Resonance Imaging Selection in Late Presentation of Stroke With Large-Vessel Occlusion (2021), published in JAMA Neurology
  • Intracerebral haemorrhage (2023), published in Nature Reviews Disease Primers

Best Publications

  • Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease and its contribution to ageing and neurodegeneration

    Joanna M. Wardlaw;Eric E. Smith;Geert J Biessels;Charlotte Cordonnier

  • Guidelines for management of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack 2008

    Peter A. Ringleb;Marie Germaine Bousser;Gary Ford;Philip Bath

  • Cerebral microbleeds: a guide to detection and interpretation

    Steven M. Greenberg;Meike W. Vernooij;Charlotte Cordonnier;Anand Viswanathan

  • Medical management with or without interventional therapy for unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations (ARUBA): a multicentre, non-blinded, randomised trial

    J. P. Mohr;Michael K. Parides;Christian Stapf;Christian Stapf;Ellen Moquete

  • European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage

    Thorsten Steiner;Rustam Al-Shahi Salman;Ronnie Beer;Hanne Christensen

  • Spontaneous brain microbleeds: systematic review, subgroup analyses and standards for study design and reporting

    Charlotte Cordonnier;Rustam Al-Shahi Salman;Joanna Wardlaw

  • Platelet transfusion versus standard care after acute stroke due to spontaneous cerebral haemorrhage associated with antiplatelet therapy (patch): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

    M. Irem Baharoglu;Charlotte Cordonnier;Rustam Al-Shahi Salman;Koen De Gans

  • Action Plan for Stroke in Europe 2018–2030

    Bo Norrving;Jon Barrick;Antoni Davalos;Martin Dichgans

  • Intracerebral haemorrhage: current approaches to acute management

    Charlotte Cordonnier;Andrew M. Demchuk;Wendy Ziai;Craig S. Anderson;Craig S. Anderson;Craig S. Anderson

  • Penumbral imaging and functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy versus medical therapy: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data

    Bruce C V Campbell;Charles B L M Majoie;Gregory W Albers;Bijoy K Menon

  • Brain microbleeds and Alzheimer’s disease: innocent observation or key player?

    Charlotte Cordonnier;Wiesje M. van der Flier

  • improving interrater agreement about brain microbleeds: development of the Brain Observer MicroBleed Scale (BOMBS).

    Charlotte Cordonnier;Gillian M. Potter;Caroline A. Jackson;Fergus Doubal

  • Imaging features and safety and efficacy of endovascular stroke treatment: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data.

    Luis San Roman;Bijoy K. Menon;Jordi Blasco;Maria Hernandez-Perez

  • Prevalence and severity of microbleeds in a memory clinic setting

    C. Cordonnier;W. M. van der Flier;J. D. Sluimer;D. Leys

  • Antithrombotic drug use, cerebral microbleeds, and intracerebral hemorrhage: a systematic review of published and unpublished studies

    Caroline E. Lovelock;Charlotte Cordonnier;Hiromitsu Naka;Rustam Al-Shahi Salman

  • Spinal cord infarction: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings and short term outcome

    C Masson;J P Pruvo;J F Meder;C Cordonnier

  • Early seizures in intracerebral hemorrhage Incidence, associated factors, and outcome

    V. De Herdt;F. Dumont;H. Hénon;P. Derambure

  • Higher neutrophil counts before thrombolysis for cerebral ischemia predict worse outcomes

    Ilaria Maestrini;Daniel Strbian;Sophie Gautier;Elena Haapaniemi

  • Dementia risk after spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage: a prospective cohort study

    Solène Moulin;Julien Labreuche;Stéphanie Bombois;Costanza Rossi

  • The Edinburgh CT and genetic diagnostic criteria for lobar intracerebral haemorrhage associated with cerebral amyloid angiopathy: model development and diagnostic test accuracy study

    Mark A Rodrigues;Neshika Samarasekera;Christine Lerpiniere;Catherine Humphreys

Frequent Co-Authors

Didier Leys
Didier Leys University of Lille
Régis Bordet
Régis Bordet University of Lille
Florence Pasquier
Florence Pasquier University of Lille
Rustam Al-Shahi Salman
Rustam Al-Shahi Salman University of Edinburgh
Turgut Tatlisumak
Turgut Tatlisumak University of Gothenburg
Joanna M. Wardlaw
Joanna M. Wardlaw University of Edinburgh
David J. Werring
David J. Werring University College London
Georgios Tsivgoulis
Georgios Tsivgoulis National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Martin Dichgans
Martin Dichgans Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Valeria Caso
Valeria Caso University of Perugia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine opens up many avenues beyond a traditional M.D. degree. For those interested in pharmacy, online pharmd programs offer a flexible route to becoming a licensed pharmacist, combining coursework with required clinical experience.

Technology-driven roles are also in demand. Accredited health information technology programs online train students to manage patient data, maintain electronic health records, and support healthcare operations.

If you prefer an administrative role, medical billing and coding online courses can prepare you for essential positions ensuring accurate insurance claims and smooth healthcare reimbursements.

Additionally, advanced nursing roles are accessible through the cheapest np school online programs, allowing registered nurses to expand their practice autonomously and step into provider roles.

These online degrees and certifications present valuable alternatives for those looking to make an impact in healthcare, whether in clinical, technical, or administrative capacities.

Best Scientists Citing Charlotte Cordonnier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles