World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Charlotte Cordonnier

Charlotte Cordonnier

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 79 17372 16323 577 549 447 32856

Charlotte Cordonnier publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Charlotte Cordonnier between 1981 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Charlotte Cordonnier published across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025, averaging 11.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 43 publications in 2021. 48 of the 502 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 43. Peak 43 publications in 2021. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 24 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 30 publications 2016: 34 publications 2017: 30 publications 2018: 23 publications 2019: 30 publications 2020: 34 publications 2021: 43 publications 2022: 32 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 25 publications 2025: 23 publications
1981 2025

502 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Charlotte Cordonnier: publications per year, 1981 to 2025
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 1
1983 0
1984 0
1985 1
1986 0
1987 0
1988 2
1989 2
1990 0
1991 1
1992 0
1993 2
1994 3
1995 1
1996 3
1997 2
1998 1
1999 2
2000 1
2001 3
2002 1
2003 3
2004 3
2005 7
2006 8
2007 9
2008 16
2009 14
2010 10
2011 18
2012 20
2013 24
2014 19
2015 30
2016 34
2017 30
2018 23
2019 30
2020 34
2021 43
2022 32
2023 20
2024 25
2025 23
Total 502
Download as CSV

Charlotte Cordonnier publications per year - data summary

  • Charlotte Cordonnier, a Medicine scholar from University of Lille, has 502 publications recorded across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1981 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2021, with 43 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1981, 1982, 1985, 1991 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 6 of the 45 years in the span carry no publications at all (1983, 1984, 1986, 1987 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 11.2 papers per year over the whole span, or 12.9 per year counting only the 39 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 143 publications, 28% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1981-1995: 14 publications (0.9 per year); 1996-2010: 83 publications (5.5 per year); 2011-2025: 405 publications (27.0 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Charlotte Cordonnier publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charlotte Cordonnier sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 441–460 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 447 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771 447
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Charlotte Cordonnier publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Charlotte Cordonnier, a Medicine scholar from University of Lille, records 447 publications - the 48th percentile of the discipline.
  • 48% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Charlotte Cordonnier, and about 52% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Charlotte Cordonnier falls inside that same range.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Charlotte Cordonnier D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charlotte Cordonnier sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891 79
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Charlotte Cordonnier D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Charlotte Cordonnier, a Medicine scholar from University of Lille, records 79 D-Index - the 14th percentile of the discipline.
  • 14% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Charlotte Cordonnier, and about 86% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Charlotte Cordonnier ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Charlotte Cordonnier is affiliated with the University of Lille in France and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, particularly focusing on neurology and cerebrovascular research. Their body of work spans a wide variety of topics related to stroke management, brain hemorrhage, and cerebrovascular diseases.

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Hilde Hénon
  • Barbara Casolla
  • Laurent Puy
  • Didier Leys
  • Marco Pasi

Charlotte Cordonnier's research is prominently published in several key venues, with multiple publications occurring in the following journals:

  • Stroke
  • The Lancet Neurology
  • European Stroke Journal
  • Neurology
  • Revue Neurologique

The main field of study for their work is Medicine, with subfields focusing primarily on:

  • Neurology
  • Epidemiology
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Internal Medicine
  • Rehabilitation

Key topics addressed in their publications include:

  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

Among their significant recent papers are:

  • 2022 Guideline for the Management of Patients With Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (2022), published in Stroke
  • Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease-advances since 2013 (2023), published in The Lancet Neurology
  • The Boston criteria version 2.0 for cerebral amyloid angiopathy: a multicentre, retrospective, MRI-neuropathology diagnostic accuracy study (2022), published in The Lancet Neurology
  • Noncontrast Computed Tomography vs Computed Tomography Perfusion or Magnetic Resonance Imaging Selection in Late Presentation of Stroke With Large-Vessel Occlusion (2021), published in JAMA Neurology
  • Intracerebral haemorrhage (2023), published in Nature Reviews Disease Primers

Best Publications

  • Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease and its contribution to ageing and neurodegeneration

    Joanna M. Wardlaw;Eric E. Smith;Geert J Biessels;Charlotte Cordonnier

  • Guidelines for management of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack 2008

    Peter A. Ringleb;Marie Germaine Bousser;Gary Ford;Philip Bath

  • Cerebral microbleeds: a guide to detection and interpretation

    Steven M. Greenberg;Meike W. Vernooij;Charlotte Cordonnier;Anand Viswanathan

  • Medical management with or without interventional therapy for unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations (ARUBA): a multicentre, non-blinded, randomised trial

    J. P. Mohr;Michael K. Parides;Christian Stapf;Christian Stapf;Ellen Moquete

  • European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage

    Thorsten Steiner;Rustam Al-Shahi Salman;Ronnie Beer;Hanne Christensen

  • Spontaneous brain microbleeds: systematic review, subgroup analyses and standards for study design and reporting

    Charlotte Cordonnier;Rustam Al-Shahi Salman;Joanna Wardlaw

  • Platelet transfusion versus standard care after acute stroke due to spontaneous cerebral haemorrhage associated with antiplatelet therapy (patch): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

    M. Irem Baharoglu;Charlotte Cordonnier;Rustam Al-Shahi Salman;Koen De Gans

  • Action Plan for Stroke in Europe 2018–2030

    Bo Norrving;Jon Barrick;Antoni Davalos;Martin Dichgans

  • Intracerebral haemorrhage: current approaches to acute management

    Charlotte Cordonnier;Andrew M. Demchuk;Wendy Ziai;Craig S. Anderson;Craig S. Anderson;Craig S. Anderson

  • Penumbral imaging and functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy versus medical therapy: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data

    Bruce C V Campbell;Charles B L M Majoie;Gregory W Albers;Bijoy K Menon

  • Brain microbleeds and Alzheimer’s disease: innocent observation or key player?

    Charlotte Cordonnier;Wiesje M. van der Flier

  • improving interrater agreement about brain microbleeds: development of the Brain Observer MicroBleed Scale (BOMBS).

    Charlotte Cordonnier;Gillian M. Potter;Caroline A. Jackson;Fergus Doubal

  • Imaging features and safety and efficacy of endovascular stroke treatment: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data.

    Luis San Roman;Bijoy K. Menon;Jordi Blasco;Maria Hernandez-Perez

  • Prevalence and severity of microbleeds in a memory clinic setting

    C. Cordonnier;W. M. van der Flier;J. D. Sluimer;D. Leys

  • Antithrombotic drug use, cerebral microbleeds, and intracerebral hemorrhage: a systematic review of published and unpublished studies

    Caroline E. Lovelock;Charlotte Cordonnier;Hiromitsu Naka;Rustam Al-Shahi Salman

  • Spinal cord infarction: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings and short term outcome

    C Masson;J P Pruvo;J F Meder;C Cordonnier

  • Early seizures in intracerebral hemorrhage Incidence, associated factors, and outcome

    V. De Herdt;F. Dumont;H. Hénon;P. Derambure

  • Higher neutrophil counts before thrombolysis for cerebral ischemia predict worse outcomes

    Ilaria Maestrini;Daniel Strbian;Sophie Gautier;Elena Haapaniemi

  • Dementia risk after spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage: a prospective cohort study

    Solène Moulin;Julien Labreuche;Stéphanie Bombois;Costanza Rossi

  • The Edinburgh CT and genetic diagnostic criteria for lobar intracerebral haemorrhage associated with cerebral amyloid angiopathy: model development and diagnostic test accuracy study

    Mark A Rodrigues;Neshika Samarasekera;Christine Lerpiniere;Catherine Humphreys

Frequent Co-Authors

Didier Leys
Didier Leys University of Lille
Régis Bordet
Régis Bordet University of Lille
Florence Pasquier
Florence Pasquier University of Lille
Rustam Al-Shahi Salman
Rustam Al-Shahi Salman University of Edinburgh
Turgut Tatlisumak
Turgut Tatlisumak University of Gothenburg
Joanna M. Wardlaw
Joanna M. Wardlaw University of Edinburgh
David J. Werring
David J. Werring University College London
Georgios Tsivgoulis
Georgios Tsivgoulis National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Martin Dichgans
Martin Dichgans Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Valeria Caso
Valeria Caso University of Perugia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine opens up many avenues beyond a traditional M.D. degree. For those interested in pharmacy, online pharmd programs offer a flexible route to becoming a licensed pharmacist, combining coursework with required clinical experience.

Technology-driven roles are also in demand. Accredited health information technology programs online train students to manage patient data, maintain electronic health records, and support healthcare operations.

If you prefer an administrative role, medical billing and coding online courses can prepare you for essential positions ensuring accurate insurance claims and smooth healthcare reimbursements.

Additionally, advanced nursing roles are accessible through the cheapest np school online programs, allowing registered nurses to expand their practice autonomously and step into provider roles.

These online degrees and certifications present valuable alternatives for those looking to make an impact in healthcare, whether in clinical, technical, or administrative capacities.

Best Scientists Citing Charlotte Cordonnier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles